本文關(guān)鍵詞：《傻瓜威爾遜》中的話語與權(quán)力　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 《傻瓜威爾遜》 馬克·吐溫 話語 權(quán)力

【摘要】：馬克·吐溫是美國十九世紀(jì)后期美國批判現(xiàn)實(shí)主義文學(xué)的卓越代表,著名的幽默諷刺小說作家。他是一位偉大的藝術(shù)天才,一生創(chuàng)作了諸多優(yōu)秀的文學(xué)作品,給后世留下了寶貴的文學(xué)財(cái)產(chǎn)。馬克·吐溫創(chuàng)作風(fēng)格獨(dú)樹一幟,其作品扎根于社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的方方面面,對(duì)十九世紀(jì)下半葉的美國現(xiàn)實(shí)進(jìn)行了有力地批判�！渡倒贤栠d》發(fā)表于1894年,是馬克·吐溫后期代表作之一。小說背景設(shè)置于1830年的密蘇里州道生小鎮(zhèn),它講述了被冠以傻瓜稱號(hào)的威爾遜的故事和一個(gè)白人小孩與黑人小孩身份調(diào)換的故事,展示了話語與權(quán)力存在的普遍性與復(fù)雜性。本文嘗試從米歇爾·�？碌脑捳Z與權(quán)力角度解讀《傻瓜威爾遜》這部作品,通過分析從個(gè)人、群體以及作者的話語與權(quán)力,揭示了話語與權(quán)力對(duì)道生小鎮(zhèn)人們生活和命運(yùn)的影響。全文共分為五個(gè)部分:引言,三個(gè)章節(jié)和結(jié)論。引言首先綜述了《傻瓜威爾遜》的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀,介紹了福柯的權(quán)力與話語觀,講述了文本的研究意義和目的。第一章選取了威爾遜和小布為典型案例,論述了個(gè)人在道生小鎮(zhèn)中是如何受到話語與權(quán)力的控制。威爾遜因其話語不符合小鎮(zhèn)居民話語的共同準(zhǔn)則,而被話語與權(quán)力構(gòu)建出傻瓜身份。在小鎮(zhèn)居民的監(jiān)視與權(quán)力對(duì)他的不斷審判之中,威爾遜逐漸順應(yīng)了權(quán)力與話語的要求,成為一個(gè)順從的道生小鎮(zhèn)居民。小布因其三十二分之一的黑人血統(tǒng)而被權(quán)力與話語構(gòu)建出黑人奴隸的身份,他的主人對(duì)他進(jìn)行的肉體規(guī)訓(xùn)以及精神規(guī)訓(xùn),使得小布最終成為一個(gè)馴順的奴隸。第二章闡釋了群體話語與權(quán)力在黑人群體和白人群體中作用。對(duì)于黑人群體來說,道生小鎮(zhèn)嚴(yán)格按照血統(tǒng)來劃分人的族群的做法是一種群體性的瘋癲。但是黑人群體的話語受到了權(quán)力的鎮(zhèn)壓。道生小鎮(zhèn)白人群體的話語就像一個(gè)全景敞視監(jiān)獄,處于其中的黑人受到了話語與權(quán)力的規(guī)訓(xùn)與控制。另外,白人話語與權(quán)力構(gòu)建了白人群體中弗吉尼亞后代的貴族身份,白人群體在用話語與權(quán)力規(guī)訓(xùn)和控制其他種群的同時(shí),也被其自身話語與權(quán)力規(guī)訓(xùn)著。第三章結(jié)合小說創(chuàng)作的時(shí)代背景,分析了馬克·吐溫的話語與權(quán)力。首先作為小說的作者,馬克·吐溫用自己作為作家的權(quán)力,借由其小說人物的話語表達(dá)自己的社會(huì)觀和種族觀。其次,為了避免與種族主義者的直接沖突,馬克·吐溫自身也受到了社會(huì)話語與權(quán)力的規(guī)訓(xùn)。結(jié)論部分指出,話語與話語普遍存在于道生小鎮(zhèn)。各種話語與權(quán)力關(guān)系交織在一起,形成一個(gè)巨大且復(fù)雜的話語和權(quán)力之網(wǎng)。道生小鎮(zhèn)的話語和權(quán)力之網(wǎng)將小鎮(zhèn)上的個(gè)體、群體囊括其中,對(duì)他們的生活產(chǎn)生巨大影響。
[Abstract]:Mark Twin is the outstanding representative of the United States in the late nineteenth Century critical realism literature, famous satirical novel writer. He is a great artistic talent, has created many outstanding literary works, to leave future generations a valuable literary property. Mark Twain's writing style of his works is rooted in the society become an independent school, practical aspects on the surface, the second half of the nineteenth Century American reality had a strong criticism. Werwilson published in 1894 fool ", is one of Mark Twin's novels. The late representative set in 1830 Missouri Tao Town, it tells the story of the title of the Werwilson dubbed fool story and a white boy with a black child identity exchange stories. Show the universality and complexity of discourse and power. This article attempts from the perspective of Michel Volker's discourse and power". Melon Wilson > this work, based on the analysis of individuals, groups and the author's discourse and power, reveals the influence of discourse and power of Tao Sheng town people life and fate. The full text is divided into five parts: introduction, three chapters and conclusion. The introduction firstly summarizes the research status of "fool Wilson" at home and abroad, introduces the concept of power and discourse of Foucault, describes the research meaning and purpose of the text. The first chapter selects Wilson and small cloth as a typical case, discusses the person in the Tao Town is how to control words and power. Wilson by common criteria the discourse does not conform to the town of discourse, and is a fool of discourse and power construction status. In the monitoring and power of the residents of the town to continue his trial, Werwilson gradually conforms to the requirements of power and discourse, become a submissive way. Because of the small town of cloth 1/12 black by power and discourse to construct the identity of the black slaves, he carried his master's physical discipline and spirit of discipline, the small cloth will eventually become a docile slave. The second chapter explains the role of group discourse and power in the black and white population groups. For the black community, road students practice in strict accordance with the descent to divide the town people's ethnic group is a kind of madness. But the black community has been suppressed. The power discourse of Tao Sheng town white groups words like a Panopticon, in which blacks are discipline and control of discourse and power. In addition, white the construction of power discourse and nobility descendants of Virginia white populations, with white populations in the discourse and the power of discipline and control of other populations at the same time, but also by its own discourse and power. The training. The third chapter discusses the novel creation background, analysis of the discourse and the power of Mark Twin. First, as the author of the novel, Mark Twain used his power as a writer, by the characters of discourse to express their social values and ethnic view. Secondly, in order to avoid direct conflict and racist. Mark Twin has also been a social discourse and its disciplinary power. In conclusion, discourse and discourse prevailing in Yu Daosheng town. Various discourse and power relations are intertwined, forming a huge and complicated discourse and power network. The Tao gave birth to the town of discourse and power of individual network will be a small town, groups included among them, have a huge impact on their lives.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I712.074

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳定柏;《傻瓜威爾遜的悲劇》題疑[J];上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1992年01期

2 郭晶晶;張黎;;誰是真正的“傻瓜”——《傻瓜威爾遜》之內(nèi)涵新探[J];英語廣場(學(xué)術(shù)研究);2013年12期

3 徐翠云;;《傻瓜威爾遜》中的身份認(rèn)同問題[J];青年文學(xué)家;2013年19期

4 李紅,田海虹;反抗異化 追尋理性——《傻瓜威爾遜》主題新探[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

5 吳蘭香;;“教養(yǎng)決定一切”——《傻瓜威爾遜》中的種族觀研究[J];外國文學(xué)評(píng)論;2009年03期

6 程婷婷;;淺析《傻瓜威爾遜》中的女奴羅克西和傻瓜威爾遜[J];名作欣賞;2013年21期

7 馬池霞;;悲劇與自由選擇——由《傻瓜威爾遜》中假湯姆的形象引發(fā)的關(guān)于人的本性的思考[J];當(dāng)代小說(下);2010年07期

8 郭小聰;馬克·吐溫《傻瓜威爾遜》評(píng)析[J];國際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

9 高健;;多重透視下的身份危機(jī)——試論馬克·吐溫小說《傻瓜威爾遜》中的奴隸羅克西娜的社會(huì)隱喻[J];東岳論叢;2010年03期

10 ;名人幽默藝術(shù)[J];廣西市場與價(jià)格;2001年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 劉夢(mèng)夢(mèng);《傻瓜威爾遜》中的話語與權(quán)力[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

2 張黎;馬克·吐溫在《傻瓜威爾遜》與《王子與貧兒》中的倫理思想[D];華中科技大學(xué);2014年

3 倪亞群;從文學(xué)倫理學(xué)批評(píng)的視角看《傻瓜威爾遜》中湯姆的背叛[D];溫州大學(xué);2016年

4 蘇彥;《傻瓜威爾遜》中言語反諷的關(guān)聯(lián)理論研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1360838