預(yù)設(shè)的概念源于哲學(xué)、邏輯學(xué),但對(duì)預(yù)設(shè)研究最多、最熱情的是語(yǔ)言學(xué)界。目前有關(guān)預(yù)設(shè)的相關(guān)研究已經(jīng)取得了諸多成果,但對(duì)某些特殊領(lǐng)域的語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)現(xiàn)象的研究還比較少。有研究者對(duì)庭審中的語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)現(xiàn)象做了研究,但其中大多數(shù)的研究停留在庭審中雙方律師在詢問(wèn)中對(duì)語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)交際策略的表層形式的描述上。事實(shí)上,在庭審過(guò)程中使用預(yù)設(shè)策略的不僅僅是律師,包括法官、公訴人和庭審中的當(dāng)事人都會(huì)使用預(yù)設(shè)。鑒于法庭庭審問(wèn)答是具有沖突性的、以目的為導(dǎo)向的言語(yǔ)行為,對(duì)法庭庭審互動(dòng)中的預(yù)設(shè)進(jìn)行認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用解釋有著很大的必要性。 本文嘗試從認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用的角度,運(yùn)用斯波伯和威爾遜的關(guān)聯(lián)理論,通過(guò)對(duì)一些庭審案例中語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)現(xiàn)象的分析,應(yīng)用描述和闡釋相結(jié)合的方法對(duì)在庭審中語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)的生成、理解、特點(diǎn)以及作用將做詳細(xì)、深入的分析、研究。從而幫助人們更深入認(rèn)識(shí)和理解法庭庭審互動(dòng)中的預(yù)設(shè)現(xiàn)象,也為預(yù)設(shè)研究提供新的視角。 本研究嘗試用語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)的關(guān)聯(lián)理論模式來(lái)解釋中國(guó)法律庭審互動(dòng)中語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)的生成、特點(diǎn)以及語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)的取消。本研究采用定性分析的方法對(duì)語(yǔ)料做了分析和闡釋。本研究所用語(yǔ)料收集于蘭州中級(jí)人民法院民事案件的庭審記錄。通過(guò)對(duì)八小時(shí)多錄音的撰寫,用2,200...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：69 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
內(nèi)容摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Rationale of the Study
    1.2 Research Objective, Method and Data
    1.3 Significance and Feasibility of the Study
    1.4 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Relevance Studies on Courtroom Trial
        2.1.1 A Brief Introduction of Forensic Linguistics
        2.1.2 Relevant Studies on Courtroom Discourse
    2.2 Relevant Studies on Presupposition
        2.2.1 Philosophical Background
        2.2.2 Definitions of Presupposition
        2.2.3 Presupposition Researches in Linguistic Field
            2.2.3.1 Presupposition Researches in Semantics
            2.2.3.2 Presupposition Researches in Pragmatics
            2.2.3.3 Presupposition Researches in Cognitive Linguistics
    2.3 Studies on Presupposition in Legal Context
        2.3.1 Studies of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction Abroad
        2.3.2 Current Studies at Home
        2.3.3 A Brief Comment on the Researches at Home and Abroad
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 A Brief Introduction of Relevance Theory
    3.2 Some Basic Concepts in Relevance Theory
        3.2.1 Assumption
        3.2.2 Cognitive Environment and Mutual Manifestness
        3.2.3 Ostensive-inferential Communication and Informative and Communicative Intentions
        3.2.4 Optimal Relevance
    3.3 A Cognitive-pragmatic Account of Presupposition
        3.3.1 A Relevance-theoretical Model of Presupposition
        3.3.2 A Relevance-theoretical Explanation of Presupposition
            3.3.2.1.P resupposition and Cognitive Environment
            3.3.2.2 Pragmatic Presupposition and Ostensive-inferential Communication
            3.3.2.3 Pragmatic Presupposition and Expectation of Relevance
        3.3.3 Pragmatic Presupposition and its Defeasibility
    3.4 A Brief Introduction of the Principle of Goal-direction
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four A Cognitive-Pragmatic Interpretation of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
    4.1 Research Questions
    4.2 Research Method
    4.3 Data Collection
    4.4 Data Analysis
        4.4.1 Motivations for a Cognitive-pragmatic Interpretation
        4.4.2 The Generating and Interpretation of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
        4.4.3 Features of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
        4.4.4 Interpretation of the Defeasibility of Presupposition Traps
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 Summery of the Findings
    5.2 Enlightenment for Linguistics
    5.3 Enlightenment for Judicial Practice
    5.4 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
Bibliography
Acknowledgements



本文編號(hào)：3957436