模糊性是語言的必然屬性,它廣泛存在于我們的語言中。語言模糊性自古希臘以來就受到很多學(xué)者的關(guān)注,并被從許多角度加以分析定義。本文作者就模糊性給出了他自己的定義,即任何一種可能導(dǎo)致一種以上解釋,在意義或范圍上具有不確定性的表達(dá)形式。自然語言的模糊性源于客觀世界的本質(zhì)以及人類認(rèn)知和語言的局限性。模糊性可以分為語義模糊和語用模糊,這為本文從語義和語用角度分析模糊性奠定了基礎(chǔ)。 法律,作為國家權(quán)力象征和保障社會穩(wěn)定的手段,是通過語言制定、頒布、解釋和執(zhí)行的,法律和語言二者關(guān)系密切。大部分關(guān)于語言模糊性的研究都是針對日常語言的,對立法模糊性,或立法語言中模糊表達(dá)鮮有涉及；在為數(shù)不多的研究過立法模糊性的學(xué)者中,幾乎都是從法學(xué)角度而非語言學(xué)角度(特別是語義和語用角度)進(jìn)行分析的。因此,對立法模糊性的語義和語用研究仍有待進(jìn)一步展開。本文作者采用定性分析和定量分析相結(jié)合的方法,利用語義學(xué)和語用學(xué)相關(guān)理論,試圖證明語義模糊和語用模糊在立法中普遍存在。并且通過分析立法模糊性的成因,總結(jié)出立法模糊性是法律的必然屬性,在立法中起著非常重要的作用。通過分析立法模糊性的利弊,作者也簡單給出了正確對待立法模糊性的方法,...

【文章頁數(shù)】：87 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
    1.1 BACKGROUND OF THIS STUDY
    1.2 AIMS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
    1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DATA COLLECTION
    1.4 ORGANIZATION OF THE THESIS
CHAPTER 2 VAGUENESS IN LANGUAGE
    2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW ON PREVIOUS STUDY OF VAGUENESS IN LANGUAGE
    2.2 DEFINITION OF VAGUENESS
        2.2.1 Definition
        2.2.2 Two Special forms of Vagueness:Ambiguity and Generality
            2.2.2.1 Vagueness and Ambiguity
            2.2.2.2 Vagueness and Generality
    2.3 REASONS FOR VAGUENESS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE
    2.4 CLASSIFICATIONS OF VAGUENESS:SEMANTIC VAGUENESS AND PRAGMATIC VAGUENESS
CHAPTER 3 VAGUENESS IN LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE
    3.1 LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE
        3.1.1 Law and Language
        3.1.2 Legislative Language and Judicial Language
        3.1.3 Attributes of Legislative Language
    3.2 LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        3.2.1 Reviews on Previous Studies of Legislative Vagueness
            3.2.1.1 Reviews on Foreign Studies of Legislative Vagueness
            3.2.1.2 Reviews on Domestic Studies of Legislative Vagueness
        3.2.2 Classifications of Legislative Vagueness
CHAPTER 4 SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
    4.1 INTRODUCTION
    4.2 SEMANTIC FIELD AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        4.2.1 Semantic Field Theory and Its Major Types
        4.2.2 Legislative Vagueness in Synonymy Field
        4.2.3 Legislative Vagueness in Hyponymy Field
        4.2.4 Legislative Vagueness in Antonymy Field
    4.3 HEDGE THEORY AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        4.3.1 Definition of Hedge
        4.3.2 Classification of Hedges
        4.3.3 Analysis of Legislative Vagueness with Theory of Hedge
    4.4 PROTOTYPIC CATEGORIZATION THEORY AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        4.4.1 Prototypic Categorization Theory
        4.4.2 Analysis of Legislative Vagueness by Prototypic Categorization Theory
    4.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 5 PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
    5.1 INTRODUCTION
    5.2 COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        5.2.1 Main Content of Cooperative P rinciple
        5.2.2 Application of Cooperative Principle to the Analysis of Legislative Vagueness
    5.3 POLITENESS THEORIES AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        5.3.1 An Overview of Politeness Theories
        5.3.2 Analysis of Legislative Vagueness within the Framework of Politeness Theories
    5.4 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 6 CAUSES AND DEMERITS OF LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
    6.1 CAUSES OF LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
    6.2 DEMERITS AND TREATMENT OF LEGISLATIVE AGUENESS
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION
    7.1 SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT STUDY
    7.2 IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY
    7.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
    7.4 LOOKING FORWARD
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS



本文編號：3954636