本文系統(tǒng)介紹了以泰尼耶爾(Lucien Tesniere)、赫爾比希(Gerhard Helbig)、韓禮德(M.A.K.Halliday)、菲爾墨(C.Fillmore)等語言學(xué)者們的傳統(tǒng)語法配價(jià)理論研究成果,分析了國(guó)內(nèi)外配價(jià)理論研究的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展軌跡。由于各語言學(xué)者們?cè)趥鹘y(tǒng)配價(jià)理論中對(duì)“價(jià)”的判定方式紛繁復(fù)雜,缺乏統(tǒng)一的“價(jià)”的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn),形成了一種“依句辯價(jià)”的趨勢(shì)。因此,傳統(tǒng)語法配價(jià)理論在一定程度上,使句子結(jié)構(gòu)的分析具有一定的局限性。本文重點(diǎn)引介和研判了蘭蓋克(R.W.Langacker)為代表的認(rèn)知語法配價(jià)理論(Valence Relations of Cognitive Grammar)。主要從四個(gè)方面論證了認(rèn)知語法配價(jià)理論的理論價(jià)值和實(shí)際運(yùn)用價(jià)值,即:復(fù)合結(jié)構(gòu)的構(gòu)成基于兩個(gè)以上成分結(jié)構(gòu)之間的對(duì)應(yīng)關(guān)系、關(guān)系側(cè)面與名詞性側(cè)面之間的側(cè)重問題、自主成分和依存成分之間不同的聯(lián)結(jié)方式、認(rèn)知語法配價(jià)理論對(duì)英語簡(jiǎn)單句與復(fù)合句的實(shí)例分析。研究表明,認(rèn)知語法配價(jià)理論源于傳統(tǒng)配價(jià)理論的研究成果,但更是其理論的延伸和發(fā)展,已成為當(dāng)今配價(jià)語法研究的趨勢(shì)。 通過分析和研判,筆者以為,認(rèn)知語法配價(jià)理論與傳...

【文章頁數(shù)】：108 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Chapter 1 Current Study of Valence
    1.1 Current Research Abroad
        1.1.1 Research into Valence Theory of the Traditional Grammar Abroad
        1.1.2 Research into the Cognitive Grammar Valence Abroad
    1.2 Current Study at Home
        1.2.1 Study of the Tradition Valence Grammar at Home
        1.2.2 Study of the Cognitive Valence Theory at Home
Chapter 2 Elaboration of Valence Theory of Traditional Gramma
    2.1 Study of Valence Theory at the Early Stage
        2.1.1 Study of Valence before Lucien Tesniere
        2.1.2 Lucien Tesniere’s View of Valence
    2.2 Study of the Modern Valence Theory
        2.2.1 Gerhard Helbig’s View of Valence
        2.2.2 ágel’s View of Valence
    2.3 Study of Contemporary Valence Theory
        2.3.1 Halliday’s View of Valence
        2.3.2 Fillmore’s View of Valence
Chapter 3 Interpretation of Cognitive Grammar Valence
    3.1 Four Valence Factors in Cognitive Grammar
        3.1.1 Correspondence
        3.1.2 Profile Determinacy
        3.1.3 Conceptual Autonomy and Conceptual Dependence
        3.1.4 Relation of Constituency
    3.2 Comparison of the Cognitive Grammar Valence between the Traditional Grammar Valence
        3.2.1 Difference in the Governing Subject
        3.2.2 Difference in Valence of the Verb
        3.2.3 Difference in Judgment of Complement and Declarative Statement
        3.2.4 Difference in Analysis Way of the Sentence Structure
Chapter 4 Application and Language Acquisition of the Valence Theory of Cognitive Gramma
    4.1 Sentence Analysis Based on Valence Theory of Cognitive Grammar
        4.1.1 Analytical Modes of the Cognitive Grammatical Valence Relations in Simple Sentence
        4.1.2 Analytical Modes of Cognitive Grammatical Valence Relations in Composite Sentence
    4.2 Application of Cognitive Grammatical Valence Relations in Practice
        4.2.1 Teaching Cognitive Grammatical Valence Relations in English syntax
        4.2.2 Cognitive Grammatical Valence Relations in English Vlcabulary Learning
Conclusion
Bibliography
Acknowledgments
Appendix
詳細(xì)摘要



本文編號(hào)：3789314