【摘要】：雖然中泰兩國都有豐富的量詞,但是研究學(xué)者對漢泰量詞研究成果比較少。本文通過語料收集和問卷調(diào)查,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)了漢泰名量詞的意義和用法存在差異。另外漢語名量詞也是泰國留學(xué)生習(xí)得漢語過程中的重點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn),因此對泰國學(xué)生在學(xué)習(xí)漢語名量詞使用時的偏誤研究就顯得十分重要。本文以調(diào)查問卷作為語料,調(diào)查問卷的設(shè)計是依據(jù)新HSK1-6級詞匯大綱中名量詞,并結(jié)合北京語言大學(xué)HSK動態(tài)作文語料庫泰國考生對漢語名量詞的使用情況對問卷結(jié)果進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)地分析。本文經(jīng)過研究歸納出了泰國留學(xué)生在使用漢語量詞時出現(xiàn)的八種偏誤類型,并在分析偏誤類型的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行偏誤探源,最后提出了對泰國學(xué)生漢語名量詞的教學(xué)對策。
[Abstract]:Although both China and Thailand have abundant classifiers, there are few researches on Chinese and Thai classifiers. Through corpus collection and questionnaire survey, this paper finds that there are differences in the meaning and usage of Chinese and Thai classifiers. In addition, the Chinese noun classifier is also the focus and difficulty in the process of Thai students' acquisition of Chinese, so it is very important to study the errors of the Thai students in learning Chinese Noun quantifiers. In this paper, the questionnaire is used as the corpus, and the questionnaire is designed according to the new HSK1-6 vocabulary outline. The results of the questionnaire are analyzed systematically with the use of Chinese Noun quantifiers by Thai examinees in the HSK dynamic composition Corpus of Beijing language and language University. This paper sums up eight types of errors that occur in the use of Chinese classifiers by Thai students, explores the source of errors on the basis of analyzing the types of errors, and finally puts forward some teaching countermeasures for Thai students' Chinese nominal quantifiers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H195.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐芹霞;;談?wù)劽吭~的教學(xué)[J];科技資訊;2009年28期

2 劉晨紅;;從名量詞的小類看其內(nèi)部的連續(xù)性[J];新聞愛好者;2010年10期

3 劉晨紅;;臨時名量詞與名詞匹配的認(rèn)知機(jī)制[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

4 吳海月;;淺析俄語中的量詞[J];俄語學(xué)習(xí);2012年02期

5 呂sゾ，

本文編號：2334383