【摘要】：一些心理學實驗認為反語加工比其對應的字面義加工過程更加復雜,因此需要的閱讀時間更加長;另一些實驗則證明這兩者的加工速度差不多。而且,在反語研究方面,關于聾人如何閱讀和加工反語還尚未知曉。因此,本研究通過兩個實驗,對聾人大學生如何理解和加工反語進行了研究。實驗一和實驗二都使用了自步速閱讀范式。在實驗一和實驗二中,變量都是兩種不同情境的材料,反語情境或者字面義情境,以及被試的類型,聾人或者健聽人。實驗一和實驗二的不同之處主要在于材料。研究產(chǎn)生三個結果,(1)跟健聽人相比,聾人閱讀反語需要更長的時間和更多的加工資源。(2)對于聾人來說,反語比其對應的字面義更難理解。(3)被試在閱讀語境不同,關鍵句相同的反語和非反語句時,比閱讀語境相同,關鍵句不同的反語和非反語句,更有顯著差異。實驗的研究結果表明,由于聾人的中文書面語水平比健聽人差,因此,相比于健聽人,聾人閱讀反語的難度更加大。
[Abstract]:Some psychological experiments suggest that irony processing is more complex than its literal processing process, and therefore require a longer reading time; others prove that the processing speed of these two processes is similar. Moreover, in irony research, how deaf people read and process irony is unknown. Therefore, this study studies how deaf college students understand and process irony through two experiments. Both experiments 1 and 2 used the self-paced reading paradigm. In experiment 1 and experiment 2, the variables are the materials of two different situations, the irony situation or the literal situation, and the type of the subjects, the deaf person or the deaf person. The difference between experiment 1 and experiment 2 lies in the material. The results of the study were as follows: (1) deaf people need longer time and more processing resources to read irony than those with healthy hearing. (2) for deaf people, irony is more difficult to understand than its literal meaning. (3) subjects are different in reading context. When the key sentences have the same irony and non-reflexive sentences, there are more significant differences than the reading context, and the key sentences have different irony and non-reflexive sentences. The experimental results show that deaf people have more difficulty in reading irony than those in healthy hearing because their Chinese written language level is worse than that of healthy hearing people.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H09;G762

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 張萌;張積家;;語調(diào)在6~10歲兒童對不同類型反語認知中的作用[J];心理學報;2006年02期

，

本文編號：2170269