《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》兼語式研究
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author studies the style of both languages in the book of the warring States. According to the category theory of cognition, this paper classifies the concurrent expressions in the Book of the warring States' Longitudinal and horizontal Scholars into two categories: one is "typicality", that is, the verb "making order" acts as V1, and the other is "atypical", that is, "to". For. " Equal form of composition The paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, which mainly summarizes the situation of grammar and vocabulary research in the unearthed literature, the definition of concurrent language style, the controversy of concurrent language study, and the general situation of the study on the style of writing and writing. The second part is the typical style of the warring States. This part is the focus of this paper. This paper first introduces the structure of five main syntactic sentence patterns in the Book of Longitudinal and horizontal families of the warring States period, and then, according to the order of the composition of the concurrent language, expounds in turn the subject study of the typical concurrent language, the typical concurrent language V1 and its modifiers and connectors. The study of the typical and concurrent language, the study of V2 and its modifiers, and the object of V2. The third part is the "warring States Longitudinal and horizontal Book", the Central African typicality, mainly discusses the "to." For. " Sentence pattern, "with" sentence structure and "have" sentence three types of concurrent language, while stressing that not all "to". For. " Both the sentence pattern and the "Yi" pattern are concurrent sentences. The fourth part is about the difference between concurrent language and related sentence structure, mainly involving the difference between concurrent language type and linked verb type and the difference between concurrent language type and subject-predicate structure as object. The fifth part is the conclusion, which summarizes the characteristics of the dual language style, and makes a simple comparison with the characteristics of the concurrent language style in the former Qin Dynasty's Policy of the warring States period. The purpose of this paper is to reflect the characteristics of the language phenomenon in the pre-Qin period through the analysis of the style of simultaneous language of the warring States period, and to make people have a further understanding of the characteristics of the style of the dual language in ancient Chinese.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:牡丹江師范學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:H141
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張凱;;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》重點(diǎn)語氣詞分析[J];青春歲月;2014年13期
2 曾曉潔,柳菁;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》“之”字用法考[J];湖南第一師范學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期
3 龍建春;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》書牘文學(xué)性芻論[J];江淮論壇;2002年06期
4 楊艷華;;論《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》對蘇秦事跡研究的貢獻(xiàn)及價(jià)值[J];江西科技師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期
5 王菡;;以帛書《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》對三晉史的若干訂正[J];文物季刊;1990年01期
6 吳媛媛;陳大志;;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》中的“以”字研究[J];牡丹江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年04期
7 劉玉環(huán);;《馬王堆漢墓帛書[叁]》釋文補(bǔ)正四則[J];西南學(xué)刊;2012年02期
8 吳媛媛;郭旭;;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》中介詞“于”“於”比較研究[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年08期
9 吳媛媛;胡宗華;;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》中介詞比較研究[J];牡丹江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期
10 車新亭;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》與蘇秦史料辨正[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1990年03期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 北京大學(xué)考古系教授 林梅村;憶馬雍[N];南方周末;2010年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 裴登峰;戰(zhàn)國七十年文學(xué)編年[D];西北師范大學(xué);2000年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條
1 李思瑤;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》狀語研究[D];牡丹江師范學(xué)院;2016年
2 李紅;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》兼語式研究[D];牡丹江師范學(xué)院;2016年
3 馬云龍;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》敘事研究[D];濟(jì)南大學(xué);2014年
4 王添羽;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》代詞研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2014年
5 張淑琳;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》注釋[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2012年
6 姚永娜;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》副詞研究[D];牡丹江師范學(xué)院;2015年
7 鄭茜;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》社會稱謂研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2009年
8 李可欣;試論《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》中的上行文書[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年
9 李云艷;《戰(zhàn)國縱橫家書》單音節(jié)同義詞研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號:2119181
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2119181.html