本文選題：沁水方言 + 中原官話��； 參考：《山西師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以沁水方言語音為研究對象,在實地的田野調(diào)查的基礎(chǔ)上,運用描寫和比較等基本研究方法,力圖通過對沁水內(nèi)部語音差異的揭示,展現(xiàn)沁水作為晉語區(qū)和中原官話區(qū)過渡地帶特有的方言面貌,為晉語區(qū)和中原官話區(qū)的接觸研究扣上關(guān)鍵的一環(huán)。沁水縣位于山西省東南部,隸屬于晉城市。其境內(nèi)方言處于汾河片中原官話和晉東南晉語的交界地帶,具有很強的過渡性。以往人們研究或側(cè)重于汾河片中原官話的特征,或選擇其晉語的特征,未從整體上認(rèn)識沁水方言。本文根據(jù)實際調(diào)查的結(jié)果,參考前人對沁水方言的分區(qū)研究,將沁水方言分為沁西、沁東、張村鄉(xiāng)三個方言片,分別以龍港話、端氏話、張村話為代表點。首先概括說明了各點語音系統(tǒng)及語音特點,并在此基礎(chǔ)上分別從聲母、韻母、聲調(diào)三方面出發(fā)對三個方言片的語音進行了比較,聲母主要包括幫非端組聲母的比較,知莊章組聲母的比較,精組和見系聲母的比較;韻母以及聲調(diào)的比較,主要從陰聲韻的比較、陽聲韻的比較、入聲韻的比較、聲調(diào)的比較這四方面著手。為進一步說明三個方言片之間具體差異奠定基礎(chǔ)。在描寫、比較的基礎(chǔ)上,進一步揭示了三個方言片之間內(nèi)部的語音差異。聲母體現(xiàn)在精組洪音和知莊章組間關(guān)系的差異,精組和見曉組在今細音前讀音差異以及零聲母有無的差異;韻母和聲調(diào)主要體現(xiàn)在遇攝合口三等知莊章組韻母的差異、咸(山)深(臻)宕(江)曾(梗通)攝差異以及入聲的差異。在揭示這些主要差異的過程中從語言內(nèi)部簡單分析其成因。最后,從自然地理、歷史行政區(qū)劃和方言接觸等外部因素出發(fā),找出形成今天沁水方言內(nèi)部差異的外部原因。
[Abstract]:This paper takes Qinshui dialect pronunciation as the research object, on the basis of field investigation, using the basic research methods, such as description and comparison, tries to reveal the phonetic differences within Qinshui. Qinshui, as a special dialect in the transitional zone of Jin dialect and Central Plains Mandarin, is a key link in the contact study between Jin dialect and Central Plains Mandarin. Qinshui County is located in the southeast of Shanxi Province, subordinate to Jincheng. Its dialects are located at the junction of Fenhe Middle Plains Mandarin and Shanxi Southeast Jin dialect, and have a strong transition. In the past, people did not know Qinshui dialect as a whole by studying or focusing on the characteristics of the central plain Mandarin in Fenhe slice, or choosing the characteristics of Jin dialect. According to the results of the actual investigation and referring to the previous research on Qinshui dialect, this paper divides Qinshui dialect into three dialects: Qinxi dialect, Qindong dialect and Zhangcun dialect, which are represented by Longgang dialect, Duan dialect and Zhangcun dialect respectively. Firstly, the phonetic system and phonetic characteristics of each point are summarized, and on the basis of this, the phonetic comparison of the three dialect films is made from the aspects of consonant, vowel and tone, respectively. The consonant mainly includes the comparison of the consonant of the help non-end group. The comparison of the initial consonants of the zhuangzhang group, the consonants of the fine group and the seeing system, and the comparison of the vowels and the tones mainly start from the four aspects: the comparison of yin, the comparison of yang, the comparison of incoming rhyme, and the comparison of tone. It lays a foundation for further explaining the concrete differences between the three dialects. On the basis of description and comparison, the phonetic differences between the three dialects are further revealed. The consonants are reflected in the difference of the relationship between the Hongyin group and the Zhizhuang group, the phonetic difference between the fine tone group and the Jixiao group, and the difference between the zero consonant and the vowel, the vowel and the tone are mainly reflected in the difference of the vowels in the third class of the Zhuangzhang group. Han (Shan) deep (Zhen) Dang (Jiang) Zeng (Chuan Tong) difference and the difference in the sound. In the process of revealing these major differences, the causes of these differences are briefly analyzed from within the language. Finally, from the external factors such as natural geography, historical administrative division and dialect contact, the external reasons for the internal differences of Qinshui dialect are found out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H172.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利;劉芳;;晉東南晉語的泥母和來母[J];黃河科技大學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年03期

2 王利;;晉東南晉語的去聲二分現(xiàn)象[J];長治學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年03期

3 王利;;晉東南晉語知莊章組聲母的讀音類型及演變層次[J];語文研究;2014年01期

4 史素芬;;晉東南方言的“子尾”研究[J];語文研究;2012年03期

5 趙變親;;晉南中原官話的人稱代詞[J];方言;2012年02期

6 王利;;論晉語上黨片方言的尖團音問題[J];山西師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年02期

7 包旭玲;;中原官話汾河片方言聲調(diào)的類型及演變[J];沈陽大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年06期

8 趙學(xué)玲;;漢語方言影疑母字聲母的分合類型[J];語言研究;2007年04期

9 王洪君;;《中原音韻》知莊章聲母的分合及其在山西方言中的演變[J];語文研究;2007年01期

10 沈明;;晉語的分區(qū)(稿)[J];方言;2006年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李晰;山西方言聲調(diào)研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2014年

2 王利;晉東南晉語語音研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王利昆;中古入聲字在中原官話的演變研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2011年

2 鄭婷婷;優(yōu)選論及沁水方言連讀變調(diào)[D];山東科技大學(xué);2011年

3 楊慧君;漢語方言零聲母問題研究[D];北京語言大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2095269