本文選題：修正性反饋 + 明晰度　； 參考：《外語教學(xué)與研究》2016年02期

【摘要】：本研究以25項西方實證研究為數(shù)據(jù)來源,統(tǒng)合分析了二語教師口頭修正性反饋的教學(xué)效果,并著重考察了反饋的明晰度、反饋方式和語言重心對其效果的影響。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),顯性反饋的效應(yīng)量高于隱性反饋;誘導(dǎo)輸出式反饋的效應(yīng)量高于直供輸入式反饋;形態(tài)句法反饋的效應(yīng)量高于語音反饋。亞組分析顯示,啟發(fā)作為多種具體反饋類型的混合體效果非常顯著。就具體反饋類型而言,明確糾錯比重鑄更為有效,而重鑄的效果又優(yōu)于元語反饋。
[Abstract]:Based on 25 empirical studies in the West, this study analyzes the teaching effect of L2 teachers' oral correction feedback, and focuses on the influence of the clarity of feedback, the way of feedback and the focus of language on the effect of the feedback. The results show that the effect of explicit feedback is higher than that of implicit feedback, that of induced output feedback is higher than that of direct input feedback, and that of morphological and syntactic feedback is higher than that of speech feedback. The results of subgroup analysis showed that the effect of heuristics as a mixture of specific feedback types was very significant. In terms of specific feedback types, specific error correction proportion casting is more effective, and the effect of recasting is better than that of meta-language feedback.
【作者單位】： 湘潭大學(xué);
【基金】：教育部人文社科青年項目“英語教師直供輸入式反饋與誘導(dǎo)輸出式反饋的對比研究”(14YJC740088)的階段性成果
【分類號】：H09
，

本文編號：2044543