本文選題：好不+X + 格式義　； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：“好不X”結(jié)構(gòu)是一種特殊的結(jié)構(gòu),同一個(gè)X,在“好不X”結(jié)構(gòu)中可能會(huì)有兩種相反的意義,一種是肯定意義,此時(shí)“好不X”相當(dāng)于“很X”“多么X”,一種是否定意義,此時(shí)“好不X”相當(dāng)于“很不X”。這種特殊的結(jié)構(gòu),在實(shí)際使用中會(huì)給讀者帶來閱讀障礙,讓漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者產(chǎn)生困惑,難以辨認(rèn)詞意。此外“好不X”結(jié)構(gòu)有很多值得探索的地方。為什么“好不X”會(huì)產(chǎn)生兩種截然相反的意義?它又是如何產(chǎn)生的?為什么這樣一種會(huì)產(chǎn)生歧義的結(jié)構(gòu)能夠在歷史上長(zhǎng)期存在?這些問題一直是“好不X”研究的焦點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn),從袁賓《近代漢語(yǔ)“好不”考證》初探開始,學(xué)者們對(duì)“好不X”語(yǔ)料挖掘愈加深入,研究愈加細(xì)致,所涉及的理論愈加廣泛,然而始終不能得出一個(gè)公認(rèn)的結(jié)論。我們嘗試從新挖掘出的“好不X”語(yǔ)料中找出其來源的一些線索,嘗試從新的角度探究“好不X”的發(fā)展演變,嘗試用一些新理論去認(rèn)知“好不X”結(jié)構(gòu)。本文主要分為六大部分:緒論部分主要介紹前人對(duì)“好不X”結(jié)構(gòu)的研究成果,以及存在的不足。確定研究的范圍和目標(biāo),介紹研究的理論和方法。第一章主要探究“好不X”結(jié)構(gòu)的格式義。一個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)有兩種語(yǔ)義就會(huì)造成閱讀和學(xué)習(xí)的障礙。此外“好X”與“好不X”還有很多交叉之處,更加混論了“好不X”的語(yǔ)義。“好X”和“好不X”既存在等價(jià)替換的情況,也存在不可替換的情況。辨析清楚這些語(yǔ)義上的差別是本章的重點(diǎn)。第二章,我們?cè)噲D探究“好不X”結(jié)構(gòu)的起源和形成動(dòng)因。前人做過很多探究,我們認(rèn)為“好不X”實(shí)際情況可能要更加復(fù)雜。第三章,我們對(duì)“好不X”結(jié)構(gòu)的句法分布進(jìn)行研究�！昂貌籜”可以作獨(dú)立小句,可以作定語(yǔ),補(bǔ)語(yǔ),狀語(yǔ),謂語(yǔ)�！昂貌籜”相比于其他程度副詞+X的結(jié)構(gòu),有著特殊的表達(dá)效果。為了能夠闡述清楚這一特殊的表達(dá)效果,本章從認(rèn)知理論來探究。第四章主要探究“好不X”語(yǔ)用價(jià)值。不管在文學(xué)作品中,還是對(duì)話交流中,“好不X”都是常見的格式。這也反映了“好不”對(duì)于其他程度副詞,有自己特殊的語(yǔ)用價(jià)值。第五章總結(jié)本文的結(jié)論并對(duì)本文寫作過程中涉及到但未及深入討論的問題進(jìn)行整理并提出相關(guān)的設(shè)想和進(jìn)一步的研究方向。
[Abstract]:The "good or not X" structure is a special kind of structure. The same X, in the "good or not X" structure, may have two opposite meanings, one is the positive meaning, the other is the "good or not X" equivalent to "very X" how "X", and the other is the negative meaning. At this point, "good or not X" is equivalent to "very different X". This kind of special structure will bring reading obstacle to readers in practical use, and make Chinese learners confused and illegible. In addition, the "good or not X" structure has a lot to explore. Why does "good or not X" have two opposite meanings? How did it come about? Why can such a structure that produces ambiguity exist for a long time in history? These problems have always been the focus and difficulty of the study of "good or not X". From the beginning of Yuan Bin's textual Research on Modern Chinese "good or not", scholars have more and more in-depth and meticulous research on the "good or not X" corpus, and the theory involved has become more extensive. However, it is impossible to draw a generally accepted conclusion. We try to find out some clues of its source from the newly excavated "good or not X" corpus, try to explore the development and evolution of "good or not X" from a new angle, and try to use some new theories to recognize the "good or not X" structure. This paper is divided into six parts: the introduction mainly introduces the previous research results of "good or not X" structure, as well as the shortcomings. Determine the scope and objectives of the study, and introduce the theory and method of the study. The first chapter mainly explores the format meaning of "good not X" structure. A structure with two semantics can cause obstacles to reading and learning. Besides, there are many intersections between "good X" and "good X". "good X" and "good X" have both equivalent and irreplaceable conditions. It is the focus of this chapter to distinguish these semantic differences. The second chapter, we try to explore the origin and formation of the structure of "good not X". After a lot of research before, we think that the actual situation of "good or not X" may be more complicated. In the third chapter, we study the syntactic distribution of Haowu X structure. "good X" can be used as an independent clause, as attributive, complement, adverbial, predicate. Compared with the structure of the adverb X of other degree, Haowu X has a special expressive effect. In order to elucidate this particular expression effect, this chapter explores from the cognitive theory. Chapter four explores the pragmatic value of "good or not X". Good or bad X is a common format in literature and dialogue. This also reflects the special pragmatic value of "good or not" for other adverbs. The fifth chapter summarizes the conclusions of this paper and puts forward some ideas and further research directions for the problems involved in the process of writing but not discussed in depth.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H146.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐文嫻;陳鑫;;程度副詞“好”的語(yǔ)義分析及語(yǔ)法化研究[J];現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)文(語(yǔ)言研究版);2014年12期

2 張海濤;;近代漢語(yǔ)“好不X”式外部語(yǔ)里關(guān)系研究[J];語(yǔ)文建設(shè);2013年17期

3 劉金勤;;程度副詞“好”的共時(shí)分布與歷時(shí)流變[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年06期

4 張海濤;;近代漢語(yǔ)“好不X”格式語(yǔ)法構(gòu)成研究[J];語(yǔ)文建設(shè);2013年14期

5 張海濤;;近代漢語(yǔ)“好不X”式內(nèi)部語(yǔ)義類型研究[J];文教資料;2012年30期

6 席留生;毛繼光;;漢語(yǔ)“程度副詞+名詞”結(jié)構(gòu)的認(rèn)知分析[J];浙江外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

7 唐賢清;陳麗;;“死”作程度補(bǔ)語(yǔ)的歷時(shí)發(fā)展及跨語(yǔ)言考察[J];語(yǔ)言研究;2011年03期

8 張海濤;;“好不X”格式的語(yǔ)用價(jià)值研究[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)刊;2009年22期

9 溫振興;;程度副詞“好”及其相關(guān)句式的歷史考察[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

10 黃潔;;副名結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)喻操作的語(yǔ)義壓制動(dòng)因[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2036274