本文選題：否定詞 + 同一性　； 參考：《同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：王燦龍(2011)與侯瑞芬(2016)認(rèn)為漢語否定詞"不"和"沒"在一定情況下具有語法"同一性"或存在"中和"的現(xiàn)象。文章不同意這一觀點,認(rèn)為無論是從經(jīng)驗上還是從理論上來看,"不"和"沒"之間都存在完全對立的分布關(guān)系。影響"不"和"沒"分布的體貌因素是謂語是否具有隨時間地點變化的事件變量,"沒"必須約束該事件變量,選擇階段性謂語,而"不"則不能約束相關(guān)的變量,選擇個體性謂語。階段性謂語在一定情況下可以衍生成為個體性謂語,而這種衍生過程通常沒有顯性的詞匯標(biāo)識,這是造成"不"和"沒"發(fā)生"中和"假象的主要原因,而實際上兩者完全對立,更改否定詞一定會帶來語義上的變化。文章將詳述階段性謂語到個體性謂語的幾種衍生方式,嘗試揭示否定詞"同一性"或"中和"假象產(chǎn)生的原因。
[Abstract]:Wang Canlong (2011) and Hou Ruifen (2016) think that the negative words "no" and "no" in Chinese have grammatical "identity" or "neutralization" under certain circumstances. This paper does not agree with this view and holds that there is a completely opposite distribution relationship between "no" and "no" both empirically and theoretically. The factor affecting the distribution of "no" and "no" is whether the predicate has an event variable that changes with time and place, "no" must constrain the event variable, select the stage predicate, and "no" does not constrain the relevant variable. Select individual predicates. Stage predicates can be derived into individual predicates under certain circumstances, and this kind of derivative process usually has no explicit lexical identification, which is the main cause of "no" and "no" occurrence and false appearance. In fact, they are completely opposite, and changing negative words will bring semantic changes. In this paper, we will expound several kinds of derivation ways from stage predicates to individual predicates, and try to reveal the reasons for the false appearance of "identity" or "neutralization" of negative words.
【作者單位】： 上海交通大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;香港中文大學(xué)語言學(xué)及現(xiàn)代語言系;
【分類號】：H146.3
，

本文編號：1940997