本文選題：利瑪竇 + 《天主實義》��； 參考：《四川外國語大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：《天主實義》是遠(yuǎn)東耶穌會士利瑪竇入華第二十年,即1603年成書的,一本“旨在要專門針對儒家士大夫,向他們提供哲學(xué)論證以作為天主信仰預(yù)備”的著述。該書采用明朝末年講學(xué)時頗為流行的語錄體形式,由“中士”和“西士”,即晚明的儒生和耶穌會傳教士于一問一答,共114次對話構(gòu)成全書,堪稱天主教漢文著譯的扛鼎之作。該部著譯涵蓋了大量極有特色的詞語與詞語的組合,很值得我們?nèi)ナ崂硌芯?其在近代漢語語法史上也有不可忽視的學(xué)術(shù)地位和研究價值。本論文以《天主實義》為基礎(chǔ)研究語料,并基于北京大學(xué)中國語言學(xué)研究中心語料庫(即CCL語料庫,以下簡稱語料庫),對該著作中所存在的“特殊詞組”,從句法關(guān)系、語義關(guān)系、語用意義等角度進行系統(tǒng)描寫歸類,同時作一定分析。首先本文使用數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計的方法對所有“特殊詞組”進行了總體調(diào)查。其次對《天主實義》中該類語法現(xiàn)象在作窮盡統(tǒng)計的前提下,以語料庫數(shù)據(jù)為對比語料,對各詞組的語法特色進行對比、分析描寫,以期獲得對利瑪竇用詞“特殊點”的發(fā)現(xiàn),并使這一語法研究薄弱點受到一定的重視。本文分為緒論、正文、結(jié)語三個部分,共九章:第一章,緒論:說明《天主實義》的價值及版本、選題背景及研究現(xiàn)狀,分析研究對象和研究方法以及探究選題意義。第二章到第八章為論文的正文部分:第二章,在聯(lián)合結(jié)構(gòu)“特殊詞組”分析上,我們將該類詞組分為謂詞性聯(lián)合式和體詞性聯(lián)合式2個大類,同時根據(jù)詞組本身的具體語法特點分為6個小類。第三章,述賓結(jié)構(gòu)“特殊詞組”部分,我們根據(jù)該類詞組賓語的存在狀態(tài),分為5個大類,共計13個小類。第四章,對主謂結(jié)構(gòu)“特殊詞組”的分析,本文主要從其語法結(jié)構(gòu)的復(fù)雜程度來分,共計3個大類,4個小類。第五章,對連謂結(jié)構(gòu)“特殊詞組”的討論,我們主要從其詞組內(nèi)部句法結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系入手來分,共計2個大類,3個小類。第六章,偏正結(jié)構(gòu)“特殊詞組”部分,我們根據(jù)常見的該類語法結(jié)構(gòu)的分類方法,將所析用例分為2個大類,共計5個小類。第七章,對于述補結(jié)構(gòu)“特殊詞組”的分析,由于用例占比最小、特殊點呈現(xiàn)較為集中,我們只從一個語法點對其作2個小類的分類描寫。第八章,助詞結(jié)構(gòu)“特殊詞組”部分,其用例數(shù)量不多,但語法特點明顯,我們將其分為2個大類,共計3個小類。文末為結(jié)語:對本文所討論的“特殊詞組”作以總結(jié)、概括,通過數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計,并對其存在的原因加以推演。同時交代該論文研究過程中存在的不足之處,并提出展望。
[Abstract]:The Truth of God was written in 1603 by far Eastern Jesuit Matteo Ricci in the 20th year of his arrival in China, a book designed to provide them with philosophical proof as a preparation for the faith of God. The book is a popular quotation form in the late Ming Dynasty. It is composed of 114 dialogues by Sergeant and West Scholars, that is, Confucian students and Jesuits missionaries in the late Ming Dynasty. The translation of this book covers a large number of special words and expressions, which is worthy of our study, and its academic status and research value can not be ignored in the history of modern Chinese grammar. This thesis is based on the study of "the meaning of God", and on the syntactic relationship of the "special phrases" in the Chinese Linguistics Research Center of Peking University (CCL Corpus, hereinafter referred to as the Corpus). The semantic relation, pragmatic meaning and so on are systematically described and classified, and analyzed at the same time. First of all, this paper makes a general survey of all "special phrases" by using the method of data statistics. Secondly, on the premise of exhaustive statistics of this kind of grammatical phenomenon in "the meaning of God", taking the corpus data as the comparative data, the grammatical characteristics of each phrase are compared and described, in order to obtain the discovery of the "special spot" of Matteo Ricci's words. And make this grammatical research weak point receives certain attention. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. There are nine chapters: chapter one, introduction: explain the value and edition of "the truth of God", the background of the topic and the current situation of the research, analyze the research object and research method and explore the significance of the topic. Chapter two to chapter eight are the main body of the thesis. In the second chapter, in the analysis of "special phrase" of joint structure, we divide this kind of phrase into two categories: predicate associative form and aspect associative type. At the same time, according to the specific grammatical features of the phrase itself, it can be divided into 6 subcategories. In the third chapter, we describe the "special phrase" of the object structure. According to the existing state of this kind of phrase object, we can divide it into 5 categories, totally 13 subcategories. In the fourth chapter, the analysis of "special phrases" of subject-predicate structure is mainly divided into three categories and four sub-categories according to the complexity of its grammatical structure. In the fifth chapter, we discuss the "special phrase" of the continuous predicate structure. We divide it into two categories and three subcategories from the syntactic structure within the sentence structure. In the sixth chapter, we divide the use cases into two categories, which are divided into five subcategories, according to the common classification methods of this kind of grammatical structures. In Chapter 7, for the analysis of "special phrases" in the predicate and complement structure, because of the smallest proportion of use cases and the more concentrated presentation of special points, we only classify them from one grammatical point to two subcategories. In the eighth chapter, there are not many use cases in the "special phrase" part of the auxiliary structure, but the grammatical features are obvious. We divide them into two major categories, three subcategories in total. At the end of the paper, the conclusion is given as follows: the special phrase discussed in this paper is summarized, and the reason of its existence is deduced by statistics. At the same time, the shortcomings in the research process of this paper are explained, and the prospect is put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H146.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 劉秉虎;王可芬;;試論《天主實義》對朝鮮實學(xué)的形成所產(chǎn)生的影響[J];大連大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年01期

2 張曉林;《天主實義》的天佛(道)對話[J];西北師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期

3 譚杰;;《天主實義》之成書過程再考辨[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年04期

4 張曉林;戴震的“諱言”——論《天主實義》與《孟子字義疏證》之關(guān)系[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期

5 鐘志翔;;王充文主實誠論平議[J];九江學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李向敏;利瑪竇《天主實義》“特殊詞組”調(diào)查研究[D];四川外國語大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：1941431