發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-28 13:03

  本文選題：概念整合 + 壓制��； 參考：《湖南科技大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),“宅”族網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞語(yǔ)日益流行,吸引了學(xué)者們的關(guān)注。但是,前人對(duì)該詞族的研究大多停留在語(yǔ)義、語(yǔ)法等層面的靜態(tài)研究階段,并沒(méi)有找出其生成和意義發(fā)展變化的內(nèi)部機(jī)制。本研究擬以概念整合理論(Conceptual Blending Theory,以下簡(jiǎn)稱CBT)和壓制理論(Coercion Theory,以下簡(jiǎn)稱CT)為理論背景。針對(duì)CBT在解釋詞語(yǔ)語(yǔ)式形成機(jī)制方面存在不足以及CT無(wú)法充分解釋新詞語(yǔ)意義生成機(jī)制的特點(diǎn),本文嘗試將CBT和CT融合起來(lái)以揭示出“宅”族網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞語(yǔ)的生成機(jī)制進(jìn)而驗(yàn)證了其融合的有效性。本研究中,我們認(rèn)為“宅”族新詞語(yǔ)新創(chuàng)意義的產(chǎn)出和理解并非某種單一認(rèn)知機(jī)制可以解釋,而是需要多種認(rèn)知方式的協(xié)調(diào)與整合運(yùn)作。我們以認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的概念整合理論以及壓制理論為理論背景,以百度網(wǎng),人民日?qǐng)?bào),新華網(wǎng),鳳凰網(wǎng)以及中國(guó)語(yǔ)言生活狀況報(bào)告等近五年的287個(gè)“宅”族新詞語(yǔ)為語(yǔ)料,結(jié)合定性與定量的研究方法,探討這一新的語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象背后的認(rèn)知運(yùn)作機(jī)制和過(guò)程,對(duì)“宅”族網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞語(yǔ)現(xiàn)象作出較為合理的解釋。論文主要圍繞以下問(wèn)題進(jìn)行論述:概念整合理論和壓制理論在解釋“宅”族新詞語(yǔ)的生成機(jī)制中二者融合的可行性;不同類型的“宅”族新詞語(yǔ)意義的生成過(guò)程有哪些不同。研究結(jié)果表明:第一,概念整合理論在解釋“宅”族詞語(yǔ)形成機(jī)制方面存在自身的不足之處,即概念整合理論不能解釋某些輸入空間之間相互沖突的成分為什么能以及如何進(jìn)入合成空間的,但該問(wèn)題可以通過(guò)壓制理論加以解決。而壓制理論不能解釋“宅”族詞語(yǔ)意義構(gòu)建的整個(gè)過(guò)程。這是概念整合理論與壓制理論在解釋“宅”族網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞語(yǔ)的生成機(jī)制中融合的可行性。第二,通過(guò)對(duì)“宅+X”結(jié)構(gòu)以及“X+宅”結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行詳盡的分析,我們發(fā)現(xiàn),在“宅”族新詞語(yǔ)意義的生成過(guò)程中,都需要經(jīng)歷概念整合的過(guò)程,在這個(gè)過(guò)程中,還需要壓制來(lái)化解沖突。對(duì)于“宅+X”結(jié)構(gòu),壓制常常發(fā)生在整個(gè)構(gòu)式與“宅”之間,而在“X+宅”結(jié)構(gòu)中,壓制的發(fā)生則與X的詞性有關(guān)。當(dāng)X為形容詞時(shí),壓制通常發(fā)生在兩個(gè)詞項(xiàng)之間(X和“宅”)。當(dāng)X為名詞時(shí),壓制常常發(fā)生在整個(gè)構(gòu)式與兩個(gè)詞項(xiàng)之間。當(dāng)X為副詞時(shí),壓制發(fā)生在副詞與“宅”之間。另外,當(dāng)X為名詞時(shí),整個(gè)“名詞+宅”結(jié)構(gòu)意義最終的生成與識(shí)解還需要隱喻過(guò)程的參與。本研究比較全面和系統(tǒng)的討論了“宅”族網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞語(yǔ)意義生成的認(rèn)知機(jī)制,進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證了CBT與CT融合的有效性和可行性,對(duì)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的發(fā)展有一定的意義,也有利于在吸引人們對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞語(yǔ)關(guān)注的同時(shí),對(duì)其產(chǎn)生認(rèn)知的影響。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the online neologisms of "house" have become more and more popular and attracted the attention of scholars. However, most of the previous researches on the word family remain at the static stage of semantic and grammatical studies, and fail to find out the internal mechanism of its generation and meaning development and change. This study is based on Conceptual Blending Theory (CBT) and suppression Theory (CTT). In view of the deficiency of CBT in explaining the formation mechanism of lexical form and the inability of CT to fully explain the mechanism of neologism, In this paper, we try to combine CBT and CT to reveal the mechanism of the generation of new words in the "house" family network, and then verify the validity of the fusion. In this study, we believe that the output and understanding of the new meaning of the new words in the "house" family is not a single cognitive mechanism to be explained, but requires the coordination and integration of multiple cognitive styles. We take the conceptual integration theory and the suppression theory in cognitive linguistics as the theoretical background, and we use 287new words and expressions of "house" family in Baidu, People's Daily, Xinhuanet, Phoenix New Media and the State of Chinese language Life report in the past five years as the corpus. Combined with qualitative and quantitative research methods, this paper probes into the cognitive operation mechanism and process behind this new linguistic phenomenon, and makes a more reasonable explanation for the phenomenon of "curtilage" network neologisms. This paper mainly discusses the following questions: the feasibility of the integration of the concept theory and the suppression theory in explaining the formation mechanism of the "house" family neologisms, and the differences in the generation process of the meaning of the new words in different types of "house" families. The results show that: first, the theory of conceptual integration has its own shortcomings in explaining the formation mechanism of "curtilage" family words. That is, conceptual integration theory can not explain why and how some conflicting components of input space can enter composite space, but this problem can be solved by suppression theory. The theory of suppression can not explain the whole process of the meaning construction of the word "house". This is the feasibility of the combination of conceptual integration theory and suppression theory in explaining the generation mechanism of the neologisms of "house" family network. Secondly, through the detailed analysis of the "house X" structure and the "X house" structure, we find that the process of conceptual integration is needed in the process of the generation of the meaning of the new words of the "house" family. Repression is also needed to resolve conflicts. For the "house X" structure, suppression often occurs between the whole construction and the "house", while in the "X house" structure, the occurrence of repression is related to the part of speech of X. When X is an adjective, repression usually occurs between terms X and "house". When X is a noun, repression often occurs between the whole construction and two word items. When X is an adverb, suppression occurs between adverbs and "houses". In addition, when X is a noun, the final generation and interpretation of the meaning of the noun house structure require the participation of the metaphorical process. This study comprehensively and systematically discusses the cognitive mechanism of the meaning generation of the new words in the "house" network, and further verifies the validity and feasibility of the fusion of CBT and CT, which is of certain significance to the development of cognitive linguistics. It is also beneficial to attract people to pay attention to the new words on the Internet, at the same time, to have a cognitive impact on them.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 段珊珊;;原型理論和概念整合理論對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞族的互補(bǔ)性研究——以“X控”族為研究個(gè)案[J];金田;2013年07期

2 郭佳;蔣鳳霞;;從網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞語(yǔ)視角看英語(yǔ)詞匯發(fā)展的理?yè)?jù)性[J];外語(yǔ)電化教學(xué);2013年03期

3 沈穎;;認(rèn)知構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法視角下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞語(yǔ)義變異研究[J];石家莊鐵道大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

4 王麗;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞生成機(jī)制的認(rèn)知闡釋[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

5 申莉;;“V得/不了”與“V得/不著”的構(gòu)式分析[J];語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究;2011年02期

6 吳為善;;遞進(jìn)性差比義構(gòu)式及其變異——“一M比一M+VP”的構(gòu)式成因探討[J];語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究;2011年02期

7 王曉娟;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞的隱喻認(rèn)知[J];海外英語(yǔ);2010年01期

8 馬曉晨;;“V紜薄雍鶴中藪親髕返酵縲麓蔥J];漢字文化;2009年04期

9 李偉;;“宅”詞新解[J];山西師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

10 付林林;;“宅”的變異[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)刊;2008年14期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊雨晴;英源漢語(yǔ)網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞語(yǔ)的認(rèn)知研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

2 張會(huì)超;概念整合理論視角下漢語(yǔ)網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞的研究[D];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué);2013年

3 徐笑音;漢語(yǔ)網(wǎng)絡(luò)新詞生成的認(rèn)知機(jī)制[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

4 謝曉鳴;網(wǎng)絡(luò)詞語(yǔ)產(chǎn)生的隱喻機(jī)制[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1815378