本文選題：類型學(xué) + 壯語方言��； 參考：《廣西大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以四個壯語方言點(東蘭、貴港、田陽、崇左)和六個漢語方言點(隆安、扶綏、南寧、桂平、博白、賀州)的分類詞為研究對象,以Aikhenvald(2000)對分類詞的研究理論為框架,從類型學(xué)的角度描寫廣西壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞的語義和句法功能,通過對比的方法分析壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞在類型學(xué)特點上的異同,最后從接觸的角度,探討廣西區(qū)內(nèi)壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞的語義和句法功能由于接觸產(chǎn)生的相互變異現(xiàn)象。全文分為四章,第二第三章是本文的主體。第一章緒論。介紹了與本文有關(guān)的分類詞理論知識、壯語和漢語方言分類詞的研究現(xiàn)狀、課題的研究意義、研究方法、創(chuàng)新點、本文的研究框架、語料來源、術(shù)語界定等問題。第二章廣西壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞的語義系統(tǒng)。這一章分為四小節(jié),一、二節(jié)分別描寫歸納壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞的語義系統(tǒng),總結(jié)其類型學(xué)特點。第三節(jié)對比分析壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞語義系統(tǒng)的類型學(xué)差異。第四節(jié)從接觸的視角,分析壯語方言和漢語方言由于接觸,語義系統(tǒng)上帶來的相互變異現(xiàn)象。第三章廣西壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞的句法功能。這一章分為四小節(jié),一、二節(jié)列舉描寫壯語和漢語各方言點分類詞的句法功能。第三節(jié)對比分析壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞在句法功能上類型學(xué)特點的差異。第四節(jié)從接觸的視角,論證壯語方言和漢語方言由于接觸,句法功能上帶來的相互變異現(xiàn)象。第四章結(jié)語�？偨Y(jié)壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞在語義和句法功能上的類型學(xué)特點,以及由于接觸所帶來的相互變異現(xiàn)象。本文初步得出的結(jié)論有:語義上,漢語方言對人區(qū)分“性別”、“年齡”、“厭惡”等語義;動物視為“有生”;一維無生物的“分叉”語義,都是漢語方言與壯語接觸帶來的變異現(xiàn)象。而壯語方言分類詞語義方面的變異現(xiàn)象是漢語方言分類詞的借入,如“個、點”,豐富了壯語方言分類詞的語義系統(tǒng)。句法功能上,壯語分類詞的句法功能受漢語方言影響較大,如:“分類詞+名詞”表定指、分類詞重疊表全量、“數(shù)詞+分類詞+名詞”語序的來源。相反,漢語方言受壯語影響而產(chǎn)生的變異現(xiàn)象較弱,目前發(fā)現(xiàn)的是平話的前綴化現(xiàn)象是跟壯語接觸所致。
[Abstract]:This paper takes four Zhuang dialect points (Donglan, Guigang, Tianyang, Chongleft) and six Chinese dialect points (long'an, Fusui, Nanning, Guiping, Bobai and Hezhou) as the research objects, and takes Aikhenvaldnian 2000 as the framework. This paper describes the semantic and syntactic functions of Guangxi Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect classifier from the perspective of typology, analyzes the similarities and differences between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect classifier in typology by means of contrastive method, and finally from the angle of contact. This paper probes into the variation of semantic and syntactic functions of classifiers of Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect in Guangxi due to contact. The full text is divided into four chapters, the second and third chapter is the main body of this paper. The first chapter is introduction. This paper introduces the theoretical knowledge of classifiers related to this article, the present situation of the research on the classifiers in Zhuang and Chinese dialects, the significance of the research, the research methods, the innovation points, the research framework, the source of the corpus, the definition of terms, and so on. The second chapter is the semantic system of Guangxi Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect classifier. This chapter is divided into four sections. The first and second sections describe the semantic system of classifying Chinese dialects and Chinese dialects, and summarize their typological characteristics. The third section contrasts and analyzes the typology difference between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect. In the fourth section, from the perspective of contact, we analyze the phenomenon of semantic variation brought about by the contact between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect. The third chapter is the syntactic function of Guangxi Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect classifier. This chapter is divided into four sections. The first and second sections enumerate the syntactic functions of the Zhuang dialect and the Chinese dialects. The third section contrasts and analyzes the differences of syntactic function between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect. From the perspective of contact, the fourth section demonstrates the phenomenon of syntactic variation caused by the contact between Zhuang dialect and Chinese dialect. Chapter four: conclusion. This paper summarizes the typological characteristics of Chinese and Zhuang dialects in terms of semantic and syntactic functions, as well as the phenomena of mutual variation brought about by contact. The preliminary conclusions of this paper are as follows: semantically, Chinese dialects distinguish between "gender", "age", "disgust" and so on; animals are regarded as "living"; Both of them are variations brought about by the contact between Chinese dialects and Zhuang languages. However, the variation in the meaning of the Chinese dialect classification words is the borrowing of the Chinese dialect classifiers, such as "Jiao, Duan", which enriches the semantic system of the Zhuang dialect classifiers. In terms of syntactic functions, the syntactic functions of Zhuang classifiers are greatly influenced by Chinese dialects, such as the categorical nouns, the total number of classifiers, and the source of the word order of numerals. On the contrary, the phenomenon of variation in Chinese dialects influenced by Zhuang language is weak. At present, it is found that the phenomenon of prefixed dialect is caused by contact with Zhuang dialect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H218;H17

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張志達;“皆”類詞同義連用舉隅[J];古漢語研究;1992年04期

2 李秋菊;;“迷”類詞的生成分析[J];現(xiàn)代語文(語言研究版);2010年02期

3 蕪崧;也談“×化”類詞[J];九江師專學(xué)報;2000年04期

4 王瑾;;類詞頭“軟”小議[J];沙洋師范高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2006年01期

5 王曉靜;;“族”及“族”類詞淺析[J];傳奇·傳記文學(xué)選刊(理論研究);2010年07期

6 胡琳;;論漢語數(shù)分類詞的界定[J];文學(xué)界(理論版);2012年11期

7 范云濤;;非典型級類詞淺析[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年01期

8 肖雨潞;俄語中的類詞組合[J];中國俄語教學(xué);1987年04期

9 孫繼善;多類詞的分布與辨析[J];文科教學(xué);1995年02期

10 王劍雄;英漢──漢英科技分類詞庫即將建成[J];中國信息導(dǎo)報;1995年11期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 覃世貞;;“死”類詞探異,等級制度管窺[A];國家教師科研基金十二五階段性成果集（華南卷）[C];2012年

2 孫淑娟;;釋“杖”——兼論“～杖”“杖～”類詞的刑具義及其他[A];江西省語言學(xué)會第七次會員代表大會暨2012年學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李彩紅;類型學(xué)視野下廣西壯語方言和漢語方言分類詞接觸研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2017年

2 郝曉艷;基于HSK動態(tài)作文語料庫的情感類詞偏誤研究[D];山西大學(xué);2015年

3 仝政;面向外國學(xué)習(xí)者的“苦”類詞教學(xué)研究[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2016年

4 曹瑞玲;留學(xué)生習(xí)得“必”類詞的偏誤分析[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2016年

5 李曼鈺;基于HSK動態(tài)作文語料庫的“然”類詞偏誤研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2016年

6 徐梅娟;《說文》飲食器具類詞研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2013年

7 李軍;湖北仙桃方言封閉類詞研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2009年

8 崔一方;口語格式“X+個+P類詞”的構(gòu)式研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

9 王菲宇;從語義地圖看漢語“和”類詞[D];北京大學(xué);2012年

10 夏露;情態(tài)范疇下現(xiàn)代漢語保證類詞研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：1793165