非真實(shí)性話語(yǔ)(Deception,DEC)的研究已經(jīng)盛行了幾十載,然而大部分研究集中在對(duì)狹義范圍的DEC(即謊言)的分析,很少有學(xué)者深入探究其成因和運(yùn)行機(jī)制,并且將性別作為變量因素納入研究范圍。大多數(shù)從事有關(guān)非真實(shí)性話語(yǔ)性別差異研究的學(xué)者仍熱衷于發(fā)掘男女使用DEC過(guò)程中所泄露的語(yǔ)言或非語(yǔ)言的線索或是語(yǔ)言詞匯層面的差異。 本文試圖從語(yǔ)言語(yǔ)用的宏觀層面來(lái)分析非真實(shí)性話語(yǔ),借用關(guān)聯(lián)順應(yīng)的理論框架來(lái)闡釋DEC在實(shí)際使用過(guò)程中的運(yùn)行方式。首先作者對(duì)非真實(shí)性話語(yǔ)的界定進(jìn)行了討論,闡述了其與謊言以及一些修辭手法的異同。陳述的虛假性并非是非真實(shí)性話語(yǔ)的充分必要條件,動(dòng)機(jī)意圖才是主要因素。不論是從策略角度還是語(yǔ)言層面看,言語(yǔ)交際都是一個(gè)不斷選擇語(yǔ)言形式的過(guò)程。非真實(shí)性話語(yǔ)作為一種語(yǔ)用策略為人們所使用,以期達(dá)成某種特定的交際目的和效果。從關(guān)聯(lián)順應(yīng)的角度看,人們?cè)趧?dòng)態(tài)的交際過(guò)程中,要對(duì)對(duì)方的認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境作出最佳的關(guān)聯(lián)假設(shè),從而使非真實(shí)性話語(yǔ)能夠順應(yīng)交際雙方的背景語(yǔ)境最終實(shí)現(xiàn)某種交際效果。 本文通過(guò)問(wèn)卷調(diào)查的研究方式,在問(wèn)卷中設(shè)置了由不同動(dòng)機(jī)為導(dǎo)向的場(chǎng)景,涉及不同親疏關(guān)系的目標(biāo)對(duì)象,旨在分析男女非真實(shí)性話語(yǔ)策略使...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：89 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
摘要
ABSTRACT
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter One INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Pervasiveness of Deception
    1.2 Research orientation and significance
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two LITERAUTRE REVIEW
    2.1 Definition of Deception
        2.1.1 Working definition of DEC
        2.1.2 DEC and lying
        2.1.3 DEC and some rhetoric devices
    2.2 Different approaches towards Deception
        2.2.1 The study from ethnic and philosophical field
        2.2.2 The study from psychological field
        2.2.3 The study from sociological approach
        2.2.4 The study from linguistic approach
        2.2.5 Major problems existing in past studies of DEC
    2.3 Studies of DEC between Different Genders
Chapter Three THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    3.1 Conceptualizing Deception
        3.1.1 Forms of DEC
        3.1.2 Intensions and Motives of DEC
    3.2 Major Theoretical Models Conceptualizing Deception
        3.2.1 Information Manipulation Theory
        3.2.2 Interpersonal Deception Theory
        3.2.3 Problems existing in the above Theoretical Models
    3.3 DEC from the pragmatic perspective : Relevance and Adaptation Model
        3.3.1 Deception as a result of linguistic choice-making
        3.3.2 Deception as a Dynamic communicative interact
        3.3.3 Deception as a result of Relevance and adaptation
Chapter Four METHOD
    4.1 Overview
    4.2 Research method
        4.2.1 Description of participants
        4.2.2 Summary of research hypothesis
        4.2.3 Description and criteria of questionnaire
Chapter Five RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
    5.1 Gender differences on cognition of DEC prototype
    5.2 Motives of deception between the two genders
    5.3 Deceptive strategies and shame levels between the two genders
        5.3.1 Other-oriented DEC
        5.3.2 Self-oriented DEC
        5.3.3 DEC for fun
    5.4 Acceptability of DEC between the two genders
    5.5 Summary
    5.6 Possible causes
        5.6.1 Physical and social world
        5.6.2 Mental world
Chapter Six CONCLUSION
    6.1 Major finding in the present study
    6.2 Limitations and suggestions for further research
REFERENCES
Appendix Questionnaire
附錄：作者在攻讀碩士學(xué)位期間發(fā)表的論文



本文編號(hào)：3817346