空語類(empty category)是指在句法、語義表達(dá)式中存在,而在音系表達(dá)式中沒有音系矩陣的成分,即它有句法和語義的作用而沒有語音形式成分。空語類是生成語法中的一個(gè)概念,于二十世紀(jì)八十年代初由喬姆斯基提出,至今仍是生成語法研究的一大熱門話題。生成語法試圖建立一套適合所有語言的語法機(jī)制,即建立一套普遍語法(簡(jiǎn)稱UG)。本文在最簡(jiǎn)方案框架下,運(yùn)用Larson的動(dòng)詞短語內(nèi)主語假設(shè)和vp殼理論、Hornstein對(duì)控制的最簡(jiǎn)分析及胡波的漢語基于時(shí)態(tài)特征和情態(tài)語素特征的假說,對(duì)漢語的空主語進(jìn)行研究,解釋漢語空主語的各種現(xiàn)象,發(fā)現(xiàn)漢語隱性的語言共性特征,以便更充分地揭示普遍語法的普適性。 胡波(2007)基于漢語的時(shí)態(tài)特征和情態(tài)語素特征提出假說,本文以此假說為理論基礎(chǔ),并對(duì)比分析黃正德(1982,1987,1989)、徐烈炯(1985,1986,1991,1994)、李艷惠(1985,1990)和胡建華(1997)等關(guān)于區(qū)分漢語定式分句和非定式分句的觀點(diǎn),對(duì)漢語的定式分句與非定式分句的區(qū)分進(jìn)行了深入探討。本文認(rèn)為其區(qū)分的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)該是：當(dāng)分句功能核心語Ⅰ的句法特征為[+Time,+Modal]時(shí)...

【文章頁數(shù)】：117 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Overview of the Research both at Home and Abroad
    1.2 The Purpose of the Research
    1.3 The Significance of the Research
    1.4 The Methodology
    1.5 The Originalities
    1.6 The Outline of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Theoretic Framework
    2.1 Some Relevant Principles within GB Framework
        2.1.1 Levels of Representation
        2.1.2 Projection Principle(PP)
        2.1.3 The Theta Criterion
        2.1.4 Case Theory
    2.2 Some Relevant Theories within MP
        2.2.1 Checking Theory
        2.2.2 VP-internal Subject Hypothesis
        2.2.3 Hu's Assumption
        2.2.4 VP-shell
        2.2.5 Uniformity Theta Assignment Hypothesis
        2.2.6 Hornstein's Assumption
Chapter 3 The Phenomenon of Empty Category in Chinese
    3.1 Introduction of EC
    3.2 The Definition of Empty Category
    3.3 The Significance of the Study of EC
        3.3.1 The Semantic Level
        3.3.2 The Syntactic Level
        3.3.3 The Philosophical Level
    3.4 The Classification of EC
        3.4.1 The Classification of Overt NPs in the GB Theory
        3.4.2 The Classification of English EC
        3.4.3 The Classification of Chinese EC
Chapter 4 Different Views on Distinction between CFNC and on PRO&pro
    4.1 Distinction between Chinese Finite and Non-finite Clauses(CFNC)
        4.1.1 C.-T. James Huang's View
        4.1.2 Xu Liejiong's View
        4.1.3 Charles Li's Point of view
        4.1.4 Hu Jianhua's View
        4.1.5 Tsang T. -C. C's View
    4.2 PRO & pro
        4.2.1 Pro and PRO in Chomsky's eyes
        4.2.2 C.-T. Jame Huang's View
        4.2.3 Xu Liejiong's View
        4.2.4 Huang Yan's View
    4.3 Summary
Chapter 5 Analysis of the Previous Study
    5.1 Of Distinction between CFNC
        5.1.1 Of C.-T. James Huang's and Xu Liejiong's Views
        5.1.2 Of Charles Li's Point of View
        5.1.3 Of Hu Jianhua's Criterion
        5.1.4 Of Tsang T. -C. C's view
    5.2 Of Linguists' Views on Chinese PRO
        5.2.1 Of Xu and Huang Yan's Views
        5.2.2 Of C.-T.James Huang's View
    5.3 Of Linguists' Views on pro
        5.3.1 Of C.-T James Huang's View
        5.3.2 Of Huang Yan's View
        5.3.3 Of Xu Liejiong's View
        5.3.4 Of Hu Jian hua's View
    5.4 Summary and Questions
Chapter 6 A Minimalist Account of Chinese Empty Subject
    6.1 Of the Distinction between Finite and Non-finite Clauses
        6.1.1 Hu Bo's Assumption
        6.1.2 The Application of Hu Bo's Assumption to Chinese Empty Subject
    6.2 Of the Syntactic Generation of Chinese Empty Subject
        6.2.1 Of the Syntcatic Genertation of PRO
        6.2.2 Of the Syntactic Generation of pro
    6.3 Of the Reference of Chinese Empty Subject
        6.3.1 Of the Reference of PRO
        6.3.2 Of the Reference of pro
    6.4 Summary
Chapter7 Conclusion
    7.1 The Findings of the Essay
    7.2 The Limitations of the Research
Bibliography
Abbreviation
Acknowledgements
個(gè)人簡(jiǎn)歷
攻讀碩士期間所取得的學(xué)術(shù)成果



本文編號(hào)：3743220