發(fā)布時(shí)間：2022-11-09 19:02

　　本文以評(píng)價(jià)理論為框架,旨在研究申奧演說(shuō)中的發(fā)話人-受話人認(rèn)同。本文的主要目標(biāo)是闡明申奧演說(shuō)如何通過(guò)利用評(píng)價(jià)資源構(gòu)建特定的受話人來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)其人際功能。確切的說(shuō),本文研究發(fā)話人如何通過(guò)態(tài)度定位和對(duì)話定位與受話人形成認(rèn)同。 理論上講,公眾演說(shuō)為實(shí)現(xiàn)其說(shuō)服力必須特別注意發(fā)話人-受話人認(rèn)同。申奧演說(shuō)作為一種公共演說(shuō)為了贏得更多的選票,尤其注意其中的人際意義。為了贏得國(guó)際奧委會(huì)的支持,申奧演說(shuō)利用各種詞匯語(yǔ)法資源促使聽(tīng)話人認(rèn)同某種觀點(diǎn)。換而言之,申奧演說(shuō)中的主題間性定位決定了這些演說(shuō)是否能取得預(yù)期社會(huì)意義。因此,申奧演說(shuō)可以用作研究發(fā)話人-聽(tīng)話人認(rèn)同的典型案例。 本文主要采取定性研究方法,但在總結(jié)時(shí)也采用定量研究方法。作者首先分析了十六篇申奧演說(shuō)中的評(píng)價(jià)資源,然后進(jìn)行對(duì)比和總結(jié)。從態(tài)度定位的角度來(lái)看,十六篇申奧演說(shuō)中共有336個(gè)“態(tài)度”,每100個(gè)單詞中平均有5.34個(gè)“態(tài)度”。從對(duì)話定位的角度來(lái)看,427個(gè)句子中,393個(gè)句子是單聲的,34個(gè)句子為多聲。研究表明,通過(guò)使用評(píng)價(jià)資源促使受話人強(qiáng)烈認(rèn)同發(fā)話人提出的某種特定觀點(diǎn),申奧演說(shuō)中的說(shuō)服力得到最大實(shí)現(xiàn)。 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：103 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 General statement
    1.2 Rationales for the present study
        1.2.1 Why Appraisal Analysis?
        1.2.2 Why speeches bidding for Olympic Games?
    1.3 Aims and research questions of the present study
    1.4 Methodology of the present study
    1.5 Organization
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Definitions and classification of public speech
    2.2 Previous studies on public speech
        2.2.1 Traditional grammar analysis
        2.2.2 Content analysis
        2.2.3 Stylistic analysis
        2.2.4 Critical discourse analysis
    2.3 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework of the Present Study
    3.1 Appraisal theory
        3.1.1 Situating appraisal in systemic-functional linguistics
        3.1.2 A brief outline of appraisal
    3.2 Attitude
        3.2.1 Affect
        3.2.2 Judgement
        3.2.3 Appreciation
        3.2.4 Realization
    3.3 Engagement
        3.3.1 Monogloss vs. heterogloss
        3.3.2 Dialogic contraction
        3.3.3 Dialogic expansion
    3.4 Graduation
        3.4.1 Focus
        3.4.2 Force
    3.5 Positioning
        3.5.1 Attitudinal positioning
        3.5.2 Dialogistic positioning
    3.6 The analytical framework used in the present study
Chapter Four Analysis and Discussion
    4.1 Attitudinal positioning in speeches bidding for Olympic Games
        4.1.1 Affects in attitudinal positioning
        4.1.2 Judgements in attitudinal positioning
        4.1.3 Appreciations in attitudinal positioning
        4.1.4 A brief summary of attitudinal positioning
    4.2 Monogloss Vs. heterogloss in dialogistic positioning
        4.2.1 Monogloss in dialogistic positioning
        4.2.2 Heterogloss in dialogistic positioning
    4.3 Graduation in dialogistic positioning
        4.3.1 Quantifications in dialogistic positioning
        4.3.2 Intensifications in dialogistic positioning
    4.4 A brief summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Major Findings
    5.3 Significance and Limitation
    5.4 Suggestions for future study
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
附件


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]形式與意義的范疇化——兼評(píng)《評(píng)價(jià)語(yǔ)言——英語(yǔ)的評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)》[J]. 張德祿,劉世鑄.  外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究. 2006(06)
[2]評(píng)價(jià)理論:在話語(yǔ)分析中的應(yīng)用和問(wèn)題[J]. 李戰(zhàn)子.  外語(yǔ)研究. 2004(05)
[3]身份策略的矛盾境地——《論不說(shuō)漢語(yǔ)》中對(duì)中國(guó)人特質(zhì)的評(píng)價(jià)[J]. 李戰(zhàn)子.  外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2004(05)
[4]“硬新聞”的態(tài)度研究——“評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)”應(yīng)用研究之二[J]. 王振華.  外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2004(05)
[5]新聞話語(yǔ)的評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)[J]. 劉世鑄,韓金龍.  外語(yǔ)電化教學(xué). 2004(04)
[6]評(píng)價(jià)與文化模式[J]. 李戰(zhàn)子.  山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2004(02)
[7]評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)及其運(yùn)作——系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)言學(xué)的新發(fā)展[J]. 王振華.  外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2001(06)



本文編號(hào)：3704728