【摘要】：本文從功能角度出發(fā),以話語標(biāo)記語“可不是”為研究對象，將話語標(biāo)記語“可不是”分為應(yīng)答標(biāo)記語和語篇銜接標(biāo)記語。從“可不是”的分布特點和話語功能切入，從語用功能角度進行描寫和分類解釋，同時在此基礎(chǔ)上將其與“就是”、“真是”等“X是”類標(biāo)記語進行替換對比分析，以期更好地展現(xiàn)話語標(biāo)記語“可不是”的語用功能。 全文共分六個部分， 緒論部分主要概述了前人關(guān)于話語標(biāo)記語的研究成果，說明了本文對“標(biāo)記語”的界定，，指明了本文的研究對象、語料來源和研究方法。 第一章話語標(biāo)記語“可不是”概述,通過對“可不是”的相關(guān)研究成果做了綜述，得出其共時角度研究不夠全面的現(xiàn)狀，文章繼承了前人對于“可不是”詞匯化歷程的探究成果，確定了本文的研究對象“可不是”及其相關(guān)格式的分布情況及其特點。 第二章“可不是”的話語應(yīng)答功能，對作為應(yīng)答標(biāo)記語的“可不是”進行了較為細(xì)致的功能分類及描寫。將其分為贊同、反饋、禮貌、反語、搶奪話輪和感嘆六種功能。 第三章“可不是”的語篇銜接功能，把作為語篇銜接標(biāo)記語的“可不是”化作三大功能類來描寫，即承上啟下功能、停頓追補功能和收束功能。其中承上啟下功能又根據(jù)交際效果的不同細(xì)分為幾個子功能類。 第四章標(biāo)記語“可不是”與“X是”的對比研究，主要討論了話語標(biāo)記語“可不是”與話語標(biāo)記語“就是”、“真是”在功能內(nèi)部的共性和差異�！翱刹皇恰迸c“真是”、“就是”在使用環(huán)境和表達的語氣情態(tài)等方面有很大的不同。文章認(rèn)為在具體使用中，交際主體面對不同的語境，在組織語言，實現(xiàn)交際行為時，總是會先設(shè)立特定的交際對象，選用不同的標(biāo)記語，以達到最佳的交際效果。 結(jié)論部分對全文做了總結(jié)概括，指出了本文研究的不足以及今后進一步研究的方向。
[Abstract]:In this paper, from the functional point of view, using the discourse marker "It's not" as the research object, the discourse marker "It's not" is divided into the response marker and the discourse cohesion marker. From the point of view of the distribution and the function of the discourse, the description and the classification interpretation from the perspective of the pragmatic function are carried out. The full text is divided into six parts In the section, the introduction section mainly summarizes the previous research results of the discourse marker, and explains the definition of the "markup language" in this paper, and indicates the research object, the material source and the research of this paper. The first chapter of the discourse marker is not "an overview, and through the review of the relevant research results, it is concluded that the research of the common-time angle is not comprehensive, and the article has inherited the previous predecessors for not the" lexicalization process". In this paper, the research object "It's not" and the distribution of the related formats of the research object are determined. The second chapter is not "the function of the discourse response, and is not very detailed as a response marker." Function classification and description. It is divided into approval, feedback, courtesy, irony, and snatch. In chapter three, the text cohesion function of the third "It's not" is to describe the "It's not" of the textual cohesion tag as the three functional categories, that is, the function of the upper and the lower, the pause The function of the complementary function and the function of receiving the beam, in which the function of the above-mentioned function and the function of the communication are different. The fourth chapter is a comparative study of the "It's not" and the "X鏄

本文編號：2440531