發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-08 06:56

【摘要】：語篇層面的壓制是一種非常普遍的語言現(xiàn)象。同其他構(gòu)式一樣，語篇作為一個(gè)獨(dú)立的構(gòu)式單位，當(dāng)其形式和功能相互沖突時(shí)，就產(chǎn)生了語篇構(gòu)式壓制。然而，作為認(rèn)知和功能語言學(xué)分支的構(gòu)式語法卻沒有將構(gòu)式的思想擴(kuò)展到語篇的范圍。 研究語篇構(gòu)式壓制是十分必要的。首先從大的方面來看，構(gòu)式語法仍局限在句子層面以內(nèi)的研究，對(duì)語篇的研究還遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠，語篇構(gòu)式語法仍不成氣候；其次，，構(gòu)式語法有關(guān)壓制語篇尚未進(jìn)行深入細(xì)致的研究，對(duì)其形成機(jī)制等方面進(jìn)行的研究嚴(yán)重不足；此外，語篇構(gòu)式壓制研究的理論基礎(chǔ)不應(yīng)局限于構(gòu)式語法本身。 本研究針對(duì)語言研究的這一中心話題，秉承認(rèn)知語法和構(gòu)式語法的基本觀點(diǎn)，通過在語篇構(gòu)式語法中分析語篇壓制現(xiàn)象，試圖將語篇構(gòu)式壓制這種語言現(xiàn)象和人類的認(rèn)知能力結(jié)合起來，并運(yùn)用隱喻、轉(zhuǎn)喻及間接言語行為理論對(duì)語篇構(gòu)式壓制做出新的闡釋。討論主要從三方面展開：壓制語篇在詞匯特征、修辭特征、結(jié)構(gòu)特征及語域特征等方面的體現(xiàn)及語篇構(gòu)式壓制的普遍性；語篇構(gòu)式壓制的生成機(jī)制；語篇構(gòu)式壓制的特征。通過研究分析，以期加深人們對(duì)語篇構(gòu)式壓制的認(rèn)識(shí)，了解語篇構(gòu)式壓制的本質(zhì)�？傊狙芯恐荚趯�(duì)語篇構(gòu)式壓制現(xiàn)象有一個(gè)更深入的理解，并希望能夠?yàn)樨S富語篇構(gòu)式語法的框架提供可能性。 論文分為五個(gè)部分。第一部分介紹了語篇構(gòu)式壓制的概念，并回顧了以往的研究。第二部分從五個(gè)方面描寫了語篇構(gòu)式壓制現(xiàn)象。這五個(gè)方面分別是：詞匯特征、語法特征、押韻特征、結(jié)構(gòu)特征和語域特征。大量語料表明，雖然與常規(guī)語篇相比，壓制語篇是一種非常規(guī)現(xiàn)象，但十分普遍。作為一種普遍存在的現(xiàn)象，語篇構(gòu)式壓制應(yīng)受到語言學(xué)家更多的關(guān)注。第三部分闡釋了語篇構(gòu)式壓制的形成機(jī)制。研究表明，語篇構(gòu)式壓制是基于兩種相互關(guān)聯(lián)卻又相互不同的思維機(jī)制——隱喻、轉(zhuǎn)喻而產(chǎn)生的。隱喻解釋了語篇的多義性，而轉(zhuǎn)喻解釋了語篇的凸顯性。隱喻與轉(zhuǎn)喻共同存在并作用于語篇構(gòu)式壓制。同時(shí)，間接言語行為理論也為闡釋語篇構(gòu)式壓制的生成機(jī)制提供了角度，使得對(duì)語篇構(gòu)式壓制的解釋更具說服力。第四部分討論了語篇構(gòu)式壓制的兩大特征——壓制強(qiáng)度等級(jí)和語篇性。壓制強(qiáng)度等級(jí)說明語篇構(gòu)式壓制的多樣性，而語篇性使得壓制語篇能夠區(qū)分于語用失誤。第五部分對(duì)論文的成果及局限性做了總結(jié)。 研究表明，語篇構(gòu)式壓制是一種普遍存在的現(xiàn)象；隱喻與轉(zhuǎn)喻是語篇構(gòu)式壓制形成的重要機(jī)制；語篇構(gòu)式壓制中的壓制現(xiàn)象具有等級(jí)性與多樣性，并不局限于某一固定的模式；語篇構(gòu)式壓制具有語篇性特征，不同于語用失誤。
[Abstract]:The suppression of discourse is a very common linguistic phenomenon. As with other constructions, text, as an independent construction unit, produces textual suppression when its form and function conflict with each other. However, construction grammar, as a branch of cognitive and functional linguistics, does not extend the idea of construction to the scope of discourse. It is necessary to study the suppression of discourse construction. First of all, from a large perspective, the study of construction grammar is still confined to the sentence level, the study of discourse is far from enough, and the textual construction grammar is still not a climate. Secondly, the study on the suppression of discourse by construction grammar has not been thoroughly and meticulously studied. In addition, the theoretical basis of the study on the suppression of discourse construction should not be limited to the construction grammar itself. In view of the central topic of language study, this study is based on the basic viewpoints of cognitive grammar and constructional grammar, and analyzes the phenomenon of discourse suppression in discourse construction grammar. This paper attempts to combine the linguistic phenomenon of discourse construction suppression with human cognitive ability, and uses metaphor, metonymy and indirect speech act theory to make a new interpretation of discourse construction suppression. The discussion mainly includes three aspects: the embodiment of the lexical, rhetorical, structural and register features of the suppression of discourse, the generative mechanism of the suppression of the discourse construction, and the characteristics of the suppression of the discourse construction. Through the research and analysis, we hope to deepen people's understanding of text construction suppression and understand the nature of text construction suppression. In conclusion, the present study aims to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of discourse construction suppression, and hopes to provide a possibility for enriching the framework of discourse construction grammar. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the concept of discourse suppression and reviews previous studies. The second part describes the phenomenon of discourse suppression from five aspects. These five aspects are: lexical features, grammatical features, rhyme features, structural features and register features. A large number of data show that suppression of discourse is an unconventional phenomenon compared with conventional discourse, but it is very common. As a common phenomenon, discourse construction suppression should be paid more attention by linguists. The third part explains the formation mechanism of discourse structure suppression. The research shows that the suppression of discourse construction is based on two interrelated but different thinking mechanisms-metaphor and metonymy. Metaphor explains the polysemy of the text, while metonymy explains the salience of the text. Metaphor and metonymy co-exist and act on textual suppression. At the same time, the theory of indirect speech act also provides an angle to explain the formation mechanism of discourse construction suppression, which makes the interpretation of text construction suppression more persuasive. In the fourth part, we discuss the two characteristics of textual construction suppression, namely, the level of suppression intensity and discourse. The level of suppression intensity illustrates the diversity of textual suppression, while discourse makes it possible to distinguish suppressed texts from pragmatic failures. The fifth part summarizes the achievements and limitations of the paper. The research shows that the suppression of discourse construction is a common phenomenon, that metaphor and metonymy are the important mechanism of the formation of the suppression of discourse construction, that the phenomenon of suppression in the suppression of discourse construction is hierarchical and diverse, and that it is not limited to a fixed pattern. Textual suppression is different from pragmatic failure in that it is textual in nature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁野;;構(gòu)式壓制、轉(zhuǎn)喻和廣義轉(zhuǎn)喻框架[J];外國(guó)語言文學(xué);2010年03期

2 李勇忠;構(gòu)式義、轉(zhuǎn)喻與句式壓制[J];解放軍外國(guó)語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

3 董成如;楊才元;;構(gòu)式對(duì)詞項(xiàng)壓制的探索[J];外語學(xué)刊;2009年05期

4 崔雅麗;;構(gòu)式壓制對(duì)語言異質(zhì)現(xiàn)象的闡釋[J];外國(guó)語文;2011年03期

5 袁野;;論構(gòu)式壓制的轉(zhuǎn)喻闡釋[J];天津外國(guó)語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

6 李勇忠;語義壓制的轉(zhuǎn)喻理據(jù)[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2004年06期

7 王寅;;構(gòu)式壓制、詞匯壓制和慣性壓制[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2009年12期

8 王寅;;“新被字構(gòu)式”的詞匯壓制解析——對(duì)“被自愿”一類新表達(dá)的認(rèn)知構(gòu)式語法研究[J];外國(guó)語(上海外國(guó)語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年03期

9 袁野;;論語篇構(gòu)式語法及語篇構(gòu)式壓制[J];外國(guó)語(上海外國(guó)語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年05期

10 袁野;;構(gòu)式語法、語言壓制現(xiàn)象及轉(zhuǎn)喻修辭[J];當(dāng)代修辭學(xué);2010年03期

本文編號(hào)：2255854