本文選題：及物系統(tǒng) + 評價理論　； 參考：《東北師范大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：由Halliday提出的三大元功能，即概念功能、人際功能和語篇功能，為語篇分析提供了有效的理論體系，Martin提出的評價理論正是為進一步研究人際功能提供了更完善的理論框架，也為功能語言學研究提供了新的發(fā)展思路。評價理論包含三個子系統(tǒng)，即態(tài)度系統(tǒng)、介入系統(tǒng)和級差系統(tǒng)，態(tài)度子系統(tǒng)還可劃分為情感、判斷和鑒賞，而本文主要采用三大元功能和態(tài)度系統(tǒng)為理論框架，從人民日報網(wǎng)站和外國知名網(wǎng)站上分別各自選取了30篇倫敦奧運會英漢體育新聞報道，采用定量和定性的研究方法闡述問題。 本文包含六個篇章結(jié)構(gòu)，第一章簡述研究背景、研究意義、文章的框架結(jié)構(gòu)和研究問題，第二章闡述了國內(nèi)外評價理論研究現(xiàn)狀以及概述了三大元功能和評價系統(tǒng)的理論框架，第三章介紹了研究方法和數(shù)據(jù)的收集，第四章進行數(shù)據(jù)分析，第五章是案例分析，進一步闡述英漢體育新聞報道及物性系統(tǒng)和態(tài)度資源的分析結(jié)果，第六章總結(jié)研究的結(jié)果和闡述本文的局限性和未來發(fā)展方向。 通過本文研究發(fā)現(xiàn)的結(jié)論如下： (1)及物系統(tǒng)中，英漢物質(zhì)過程皆為主要過程，其次是關(guān)系過程、行為過程、心理過程、言語過程、存在過程，人民日報的物質(zhì)過程多于英國衛(wèi)報，中國媒體更加注重描述體育事件本身以保持體育新聞報道的客觀性。 (2)態(tài)度評價系統(tǒng)中，英漢媒體在評價策略的使用上存在差異，首先從態(tài)度資源的數(shù)量上來看，英國媒體使用了更多的態(tài)度資源；其次從態(tài)度資源的來源上看，英語體育報道中使用了更多的作者情感資源，漢語體育報道中使用了更多的非作者情感資源；最后從態(tài)度資源的分布上來看，英漢判斷和鑒賞資源使用頻率皆超過了情感資源，中國新聞報道者更多的使用了鑒賞資源，而外國新聞報道者使用了更多的判斷資源，具體到各子資源的使用上，中國體育新聞報道者比外國報道者更多的使用了社會尊重，中國媒體傾向于使用價值鑒賞資源，外國媒體傾向于使用反應(yīng)鑒賞資源。 (3)造成中西方及物系統(tǒng)和評價策略使用不同的主要原因是中西方不同的社會文化價值，中國屬于集體主義國家，，傾向于維持和諧的人際關(guān)系和社會關(guān)系，在評論時往往采取委婉的方式進行表達，而西方崇尚個人主義文化，注重言論自由，往往采取直接和開放的言論方式。
[Abstract]:The three metafunctions put forward by Halliday, namely conceptual function, interpersonal function and textual function, provide an effective theoretical system for discourse analysis. It also provides a new way of development for the study of functional linguistics. The theory of evaluation includes three subsystems: attitude system, intervention system and differential system. Attitude subsystem can also be divided into emotion, judgment and appreciation. In this paper, three metafunctions and attitude systems are used as the theoretical framework. From the People's Daily website and the famous foreign websites, 30 articles of sports news reports on the London Olympic Games were selected respectively, and the quantitative and qualitative research methods were used to expound the problems. The first chapter briefly describes the research background, the significance, the frame structure and the research issues of the article. The second chapter describes the current situation of the domestic and foreign evaluation theory and summarizes the three meta-functions and the theoretical framework of the evaluation system. The third chapter introduces the research methods and data collection, the fourth chapter carries on the data analysis, the fifth chapter is the case analysis, further elaborated the English and Chinese sports news report and the materiality system and the attitude resources analysis result, The sixth chapter summarizes the research results and expounds the limitations and future development direction of this paper. The conclusions are as follows: (1) in transitive systems, the material processes in English and Chinese are the main processes, followed by relational processes, behavioral processes, psychological processes, speech processes, existential processes, and the People's Daily material processes are more than those of the British Guardian. Chinese media pay more attention to describing sports events in order to maintain the objectivity of sports news reports. (2) in the attitude evaluation system, there are differences in the use of evaluation strategies between English and Chinese media. Firstly, from the perspective of the quantity of attitude resources, the British media use more attitude resources, and secondly, from the perspective of the source of attitude resources. More author affective resources are used in English sports reports and more non-author affective resources are used in Chinese sports reports. Finally, judging and appreciating resources in English and Chinese are used more frequently than affective resources in terms of the distribution of attitude resources. Chinese news reporters use more appreciation resources, while foreign news reporters use more judgment resources. Specifically, in terms of the use of various sub-resources, Chinese sports news reporters use social respect more than foreign reporters. Chinese media tend to use value appreciation resources, while foreign media tend to use reaction appreciation resources. 3) the main reason for the different use of Chinese and Western transitive systems and evaluation strategies is the different social and cultural values between China and the West. China is a collectivist country and tends to maintain harmonious interpersonal and social relations. In comments, euphemism is often adopted, while in the West individualism culture is advocated, freedom of speech is emphasized, and direct and open speech is often adopted.
【學位授予單位】：東北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G212;H15;H315

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李衛(wèi)航;英漢委婉語的社會文化透視[J];福州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2002年01期

2 程進;;英語報刊中體育新聞的態(tài)度意義研究[J];高等工程教育研究;2008年S1期

3 李戰(zhàn)子;功能語法中的人際意義框架的擴展[J];外語研究;2001年01期

4 鞠玉梅;英語報刊體育新聞?wù)Z體量化研究[J];外語研究;2004年02期

5 李榮娟;英語專欄語篇中態(tài)度意義的評價理論視角[J];山東外語教學;2005年04期

6 朱永生;;概念意義中的隱性評價[J];外語教學;2009年04期

7 劉世鑄,韓金龍;新聞話語的評價系統(tǒng)[J];外語電化教學;2004年04期

8 陳曉燕;;英漢社論語篇態(tài)度資源對比分析[J];外國語(上海外國語大學學報);2007年03期

本文編號：1990681