本文選題：“草”隱喻 + “Grass”隱喻�。� 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隱喻的研究經(jīng)歷了一個(gè)漫長的過程,最早可以追溯至亞里士多德。傳統(tǒng)語言學(xué)觀點(diǎn)中,隱喻在很長一段時(shí)間內(nèi)僅被視作一種修辭現(xiàn)象或詞語層面的異常語言現(xiàn)象。20世紀(jì)70年代以來,隨著現(xiàn)代認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的興起,人們開始跳出詞語層面,擺脫以文學(xué)和修辭學(xué)為本的傳統(tǒng)隱喻理論的束縛,試著從認(rèn)知的角度重新審視隱喻的內(nèi)涵。1980年Lakoff Johnson的合著《我們賴以生存的隱喻》標(biāo)志看認(rèn)知隱喻理論的誕生,將隱喻解讀為植根于人類思維抽象概念的認(rèn)知工具。自此,各個(gè)領(lǐng)域的學(xué)者紛紛從人類體驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上發(fā)掘新的角度諸如情感隱喻、肢體隱喻、動物隱喻等,對認(rèn)知隱喻理論開展研究,探索人類思維通過隱喻模式將基本概念映射到其他抽象概念的工作機(jī)制。這些都為認(rèn)知隱喻理論的繼續(xù)發(fā)展提供了不少寶貴的經(jīng)驗(yàn)基礎(chǔ)和參考價(jià)值。“草”和"Grass"無處不在,是人類接觸最早最多的植物�；谌祟悓Α安荨焙汀�'Grass"的豐富認(rèn)知積累,“草”和"Grass"成為文學(xué)作品中引人注目的重要意象,產(chǎn)生了大量的隱喻表達(dá)。然而前人隱喻研究往往局限于幾個(gè)特別典型的對象,對于“草”隱喻和"Grass"隱喻的研究無論在中文還是英文里面至今寥寥無幾。因此本文重點(diǎn)分析《牛津高階英漢雙解詞典》(第七版)、《漢語大詞典》、《漢語成語大辭典》、國家現(xiàn)代漢語語料庫、北京大學(xué)中國語言學(xué)研究中心的現(xiàn)代漢語語料庫、美國當(dāng)代英語語料庫、以及英語國家語料庫中收錄的248個(gè)相關(guān)詞條(見附錄),致力于以概念隱喻和映射理論為理論基礎(chǔ)對“草”隱喻和"Grass"隱喻展開對比研究,并且分析造成其普遍性和差異性的原因。全文主體包括三個(gè)部分。第一部分,作者概述了隱喻研究的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,反思了“草”隱喻和"Grass"隱喻對比的研究現(xiàn)狀,得出選題背景。第二部分作者將概念隱喻、映射理論和隱喻的認(rèn)知機(jī)制作為該研究的理論基礎(chǔ),為后面對比分析的開展提供強(qiáng)有力的理論支撐。第三部分是本研究的主體部分。通過對語料的搜集和分析,引用大量文學(xué)作品舉證,作者根據(jù)生長地點(diǎn),形狀,作用,和生命狀態(tài)四個(gè)方面對“草”隱喻和"Grass"隱喻進(jìn)行分類,得出“草”隱喻和"Grass"隱喻的普遍性和差異性。作者將識別出的普遍性歸因于人類共同的身體體驗(yàn),從而驗(yàn)證了萊考夫等人關(guān)于隱喻具有體驗(yàn)性的觀點(diǎn)。然而正如Lakoff Johnson所說：“每一種經(jīng)驗(yàn)都是在一個(gè)大的文化預(yù)設(shè)背景下發(fā)生的。更正確地說,所有的經(jīng)驗(yàn)都完完全全是文化的,我們以這樣的方式體驗(yàn)世界,以至于我們的文化已經(jīng)在經(jīng)驗(yàn)本身中體現(xiàn)出來了。”(1980：58)不同的歷史背景,文化傳統(tǒng)和思維方式也同樣會作用于我們的經(jīng)驗(yàn)本身,從而造成隱喻意義的差異。本文從認(rèn)知隱喻的視角對“草”隱喻和"Grass"隱喻進(jìn)行了對比研究,從某種程度上支持了隱喻的認(rèn)知語言學(xué)觀點(diǎn),并突顯了“草”隱喻和"Grass"隱喻研究對跨語言和跨文化研究的重要性。以“草”和‘'Grass"為新的研究對象拓寬了以往的研究范圍,豐富了植物隱喻乃至認(rèn)知隱喻的研究內(nèi)容,有助于我們更進(jìn)一步了解文化和語言之間密不可分的關(guān)系,對語言教學(xué),語言翻譯以及跨文化交際方面均提供了可借鑒的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。
[Abstract]:The study of metaphor has gone through a long process, which can be traced back to Aristotle. In the traditional linguistic view, metaphor is regarded as only a rhetorical phenomenon or an abnormal language phenomenon in a long period of time. Since the 70s of the.20 century, with the rise of modern cognitive linguistics, people begin to jump out of the word level. Taking off the binding of traditional metaphorical theory based on literature and rhetoric, we try to reexamine the connotation of metaphor from the perspective of cognition in terms of the connotations of Lakoff Johnson,.1980, "metaphor > which we depend on for survival", to see the birth of cognitive metaphor theory, and to interpret metaphor as a cognitive tool rooted in the concept of human thinking. On the basis of human experience, scholars have excavated new angles such as emotional metaphor, body metaphor, animal metaphor, research on cognitive metaphor theory, and exploring the work mechanism of human thinking mapping basic concepts to other abstract concepts through metaphorical patterns. These are all valuable for the continued development of cognitive metaphorical theory. The experience base and reference value. "Grass" and "Grass" are the earliest plants in human contact. Based on the rich cognitive accumulation of "grass" and "'Grass", "grass" and "Grass" have become an important and important image in literary works, producing a large amount of metaphorical expression. The study of "grass" metaphor and "Grass" metaphor is very few in Chinese and English. Therefore, this paper focuses on the analysis of the Oxford high order English Chinese double solution Dictionary (7th Edition), the Chinese dictionary, the Chinese idiom dictionary, the Chinese Modern Chinese corpus, and the Chinese linguistics study of Peking University. The central modern Chinese corpus, the American Contemporary English corpus, and the 248 related entries in the English National Corpus (see Appendix) are devoted to a comparative study of "grass" and "Grass" metaphors based on conceptual metaphor and mapping theory, and analyze the reasons for their universality and differences. It includes three parts. In the first part, the author summarizes the development of metaphor research, rethinks the research status of "grass" metaphor and "Grass" metaphor, and draws the background of the topic. The second part of the author takes the conceptual metaphor, the mapping theory and the cognitive mechanism of metaphor as the theoretical basis of this research, and provides a strong basis for the development of the following comparative analysis. The third part is the main part of this study. Through the collection and analysis of the corpus, a large number of literary works are cited, and the author classifies the "grass" metaphor and the "Grass" metaphor according to the four aspects of the place of growth, shape, function and the state of life, and obtains the universality and difference of the "grass" metaphor and the "Grass" metaphor. The authors attribute the universality to the common physical experience of human beings, which verifies that Lakoff and others have an experiential view of metaphor. However, as Lakoff Johnson says, "every experience occurs in a large cultural presupposition. More correctly, all experience is completely cultural," We experience the world in such a way that our culture has been embodied in the experience itself. "(1980:58) different historical backgrounds, cultural traditions and ways of thinking also play a role in our experience itself, resulting in the difference in metaphorical meaning. This article from the perspective of cognitive metaphor of" grass "metaphor and" Grass ". The comparative study of metaphor supports the cognitive linguistic views of metaphor to some extent, and highlights the importance of the study of "grass" and "Grass" metaphors to cross language and cross-cultural studies. "Grass" and "'Grass" broaden the scope of previous research, enriching plant metaphors and even cognitive metaphors. The research content will help us to further understand the inseparable relationship between culture and language, and provide lessons for language teaching, language translation and intercultural communication.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H15;H315

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 胡慧玲;;植物隱喻英漢互譯處理技巧[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期

2 鐘巧靈;;中國古代詩歌中的草意象探析[J];湖南第一師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

3 劉振前;隱喻的范疇化和概念化過程[J];四川外語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

，

本文編號：1960389