本文選題：法庭話語(yǔ) + 批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：法庭話語(yǔ)是一種特殊的機(jī)構(gòu)話語(yǔ)，反映了庭審各主體之間由于社會(huì)地位、教育背景、法律知識(shí)、話語(yǔ)技巧等因素而產(chǎn)生的權(quán)力關(guān)系不對(duì)稱。近年來(lái)，隨著法律語(yǔ)言學(xué)的興起，很多學(xué)者將目光放在了法庭審判的語(yǔ)言活動(dòng)上，但用語(yǔ)言學(xué)方法來(lái)系統(tǒng)描述庭審主體及其話語(yǔ)特征、言語(yǔ)行為和目的的研究仍然較為缺乏。國(guó)外研究雖有重要參考價(jià)值，但由于語(yǔ)言和法律體系的不同，并不能完全照搬。因此，本文在充分借鑒前人研究成功的基礎(chǔ)上，從批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的角度，通過(guò)分析微觀的法庭話語(yǔ)的語(yǔ)言細(xì)節(jié)，描述了中國(guó)庭審各主體的話語(yǔ)權(quán)力和話語(yǔ)策略，試圖揭示其背后隱藏的權(quán)力關(guān)系和意識(shí)形態(tài)，并對(duì)中國(guó)司法改革提出相應(yīng)的建議。 本文根據(jù)批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的基本原則和方法論，通過(guò)分析八場(chǎng)法庭審判（四場(chǎng)刑事、四場(chǎng)民事）中的語(yǔ)料，發(fā)現(xiàn)庭審中的權(quán)勢(shì)主體（法官、檢察官、律師）由于具備較高的社會(huì)地位及豐富的法律知識(shí)，，總是試圖對(duì)法庭話語(yǔ)的話題和進(jìn)程進(jìn)行控制，以達(dá)到自己的話語(yǔ)目的；同時(shí)，庭審中的弱勢(shì)主體（原告、被告、證人）并非對(duì)此無(wú)能為力，通過(guò)合適的話語(yǔ)策略，弱勢(shì)者能夠抵制強(qiáng)勢(shì)者的話語(yǔ)控制，并且嘗試在某種程度上對(duì)法庭話語(yǔ)進(jìn)行控制。因此，庭審各主體間不對(duì)稱的權(quán)力關(guān)系是通過(guò)法庭話語(yǔ)來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)和維護(hù)的，而這一不對(duì)稱的權(quán)力關(guān)系又反過(guò)來(lái)影響法庭話語(yǔ)的內(nèi)容和方式。 在中國(guó)的司法改革進(jìn)程中，法庭話語(yǔ)是實(shí)現(xiàn)司法正義不可或缺的一環(huán)；因此，從微觀話語(yǔ)細(xì)節(jié)來(lái)分析和揭示我國(guó)法庭審判的模式和現(xiàn)狀是很有必有的。從語(yǔ)言學(xué)角度了解和認(rèn)識(shí)到隱藏在法庭話語(yǔ)背后的意識(shí)形態(tài)及權(quán)力關(guān)系，就為提出相應(yīng)的司法改革建議并最終實(shí)現(xiàn)司法正義，提供了切實(shí)可行的前提和基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Court discourse is a special kind of institutional discourse, which reflects the asymmetry of power relations between the subjects of trial due to social status, educational background, legal knowledge, discourse skills and so on. In recent years, with the rise of forensic linguistics, many scholars have focused on the language activities of court trial, but the linguistic method is used to systematically describe the trial subject and its discourse characteristics, and the study of speech act and purpose is still lacking. Although the study abroad has important reference value, it can not be completely copied because of the difference of language and legal system. Therefore, on the basis of the success of previous studies, this paper, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, describes the discourse power and discourse strategy of Chinese trial subjects by analyzing the language details of microcosmic court discourse. This paper tries to reveal the hidden power relationship and ideology behind it, and puts forward corresponding suggestions to China's judicial reform. According to the basic principles and methodology of critical discourse analysis, this paper analyzes the corpus of eight court trials (four criminal, four civil), and finds out the powerful subjects (judges, prosecutors) in the trial. Because of their high social status and rich legal knowledge, they always try to control the topic and process of the court discourse in order to achieve their own purpose; at the same time, the vulnerable subjects in the trial (plaintiff, defendant, Witness) is not powerless, through the appropriate discourse strategy, the weak can resist the strong discourse control, and try to control the court discourse to some extent. Therefore, the asymmetric power relationship among the subjects in the trial is realized and maintained through the court discourse, which in turn affects the content and the way of the court discourse. In the process of judicial reform in China, court discourse is an indispensable part in the realization of judicial justice; therefore, it is necessary to analyze and reveal the pattern and present situation of court trial in China from the micro discourse details. Understanding and recognizing the ideology and power relationship hidden behind the court discourse from the linguistic point of view provides a practical premise and foundation for putting forward the corresponding judicial reform proposals and finally realizing the judicial justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2;H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 苗興偉;;語(yǔ)篇分析的進(jìn)展與前沿[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2006年01期

2 辛斌;;批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析:批評(píng)與反思[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2008年06期

3 辛斌;批評(píng)性語(yǔ)篇分析:問(wèn)題與討論[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2004年05期

本文編號(hào)：1921682