本文選題：《說文解字注》 + 今正��； 參考：《寧夏大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：東漢許慎的《說文解字》(以下簡稱《說文》)是我國第一部以六書理論系統(tǒng)分析漢字字形、字音并揭示本義的字典,是我國語言史上的一部巨著�！墩f文》面世后,歷經(jīng)千百年的傳抄刊刻,幾經(jīng)竄改,謬誤漸增。力圖還原許書之舊一直是說文學(xué)家們的一件大事。其中具有開創(chuàng)之功且影響最大的當(dāng)屬段玉裁的《說文解字注》(以下簡稱《段注》)。段氏以“今正”為標(biāo)志,運(yùn)用考據(jù)學(xué)、�？睂W(xué)等手段,以其所見大徐本為依托,綜考小徐本及其他經(jīng)典文獻(xiàn),一方面大量增刪改訂《說文》,一方面揭示《說文》之宗旨與體例,取得了非凡的成就,具有很高的研究價值。 本文以中華書局1963年影印出版的大徐本《說文》(同治十二年陳昌治刻本)為基準(zhǔn),將其第三篇與《段注》進(jìn)行比對,共輯錄了258條異處,我們稱之為段注“今正”,以此作為本文的研究對象。經(jīng)過歸納總結(jié),除去附錄部分的15條無實(shí)質(zhì)性差異之“今正”,我們將剩余243條“今正”從形式上分為三大類型：正而有注、正而未注、注中含正,分列三章對其進(jìn)行研究。每章之下,從內(nèi)容的角度出發(fā),又將“正而有注”和“注中含正”例分為正篆文、正字義、正音讀結(jié)構(gòu)、正引文四個方面；將“正而未注”例分為正篆文、正字義、正音讀結(jié)構(gòu)、正重文說解四個方面。在此分類的基礎(chǔ)上展開逐條考辨,有無從考證或心有疑惑之處以“存疑”論之。本文最后一章的“評議”部分,通過對比此三大類的“今正”,總結(jié)了段氏“注中含正”的原因有四點(diǎn)：未有確據(jù),信心不足；“可改”而非“必改”；知今本有誤,但不知原貌作何；兩種看法,暫取其一。最后,簡要評價了《說文》第三篇段注“今正”的得失,并提出對段注“今正”進(jìn)行全面系統(tǒng)研究的構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:Xu Shen's "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" (hereinafter referred to as Shuo Wen) in the Eastern Han Dynasty is the first dictionary in China to systematically analyze Chinese characters' shapes, sounds and meanings with the theory of six books. It is a great work in the history of Chinese language. After thousands of years of copying engraved, after several tampering, fallacy gradually increased. Trying to restore the old books has always been a major event for writers. Among them, the most influential one is Duan Yu-cai 's "Shuowen Jie Zi Notes" (hereinafter referred to as "paragraph Notes"). By means of textual research and collation, and relying on what he sees as Da Xu Ben, Duan's comprehensive examination of Xiao Xu Ben and other classical documents, on the one hand, adds, deletes, and deletes and modifies Shuo Wen; on the other hand, he reveals the purpose and style of "Shuo Wen", on the one hand, by means of textual research and collation, etc. Has obtained the remarkable achievement, has the very high research value. In this paper, the author compares the third edition of Daxu Shuo Wen (Chen Changzhi's engraved edition in 12 years of Tongzhi) with the Duan Notes, and compiles 258 different items, which we call the Duan Notes, which are published by Zhonghua Book Co., Ltd in 1963. Take this as the research object of this paper. After summing up, we divide the remaining 243 articles into three types: positive note, three chapters to study them. Under each chapter, from the content point of view, the examples of "positive but positive" and "contain positive" are divided into four aspects: positive seal script, positive character meaning, positive pronunciation structure, positive citation; "positive but not annotated" is divided into positive seal script, positive character meaning, The structure of correct pronunciation and the explanation of orthography are four aspects. On the basis of this classification, there is no textual research or doubt. In the "comment" part of the last chapter of this paper, by comparing the three categories of "present and correct", the author summarizes the reasons for Duan's "positive in the note": there are four reasons for Duan's "positive in note": there is no accurate evidence, no confidence, "can be changed" rather than "must be changed", and there is a mistake in knowing this. But I don't know what to do with it. Finally, the paper briefly evaluates the gains and losses of the third paragraph note "Jin Zheng", and puts forward the idea of making a comprehensive and systematic study on the paragraph "Jin Zheng".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧夏大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H161

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李傳書;段玉裁訓(xùn)詁研究的原則和方法[J];長沙電力學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1997年01期

2 王克讓;《說文解字注》拾遺[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1995年04期

3 吳昕;段玉裁與他的《說文解字注》──評段玉裁的治學(xué)方法[J];江西社會科學(xué);2001年06期

4 馬固鋼;讀《說文解字注》雜記一則[J];湘潭大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;1990年01期

5 黃圓;段玉裁《說文解字注》中有關(guān)古今字論述的考察[J];安順師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2005年02期

6 何書;《說文解字注》的語法觀[J];徐州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年06期

7 孫啟榮;;也談段玉裁的古今字觀[J];承德民族師專學(xué)報;2007年03期

8 馬立春;;段玉裁《說文解字注》古今字類析[J];貴州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年08期

9 莊秋菊;;從“示、王、倄”三部看《字林考逸》與《說文解字注》的異同[J];現(xiàn)代語文(語言研究版);2010年10期

10 王海根;探幽燭隱 考鏡源流——試論《說文解字注》一大特點(diǎn)及其應(yīng)用[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1984年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 王麗;;《說文解字注》“王x”當(dāng)為“王冰”[A];中華中醫(yī)藥學(xué)會醫(yī)古文分會成立30周年暨第二十次學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文集[C];2011年

2 李春曉;;《說文解字六書疏證》所引方俗考[A];中國訓(xùn)詁學(xué)研究會2010年學(xué)術(shù)年會論文摘要集[C];2010年

3 郭，

本文編號：1918923