本文選題：擬人隱喻 + 概念整合理論�。� 參考：《湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)語言學將隱喻視作一種語言現(xiàn)象,視作語言形式上的修辭,是語言裝飾的手段。從古希臘的Aristotle開始,人們從修辭的角度探索隱喻的奧秘。近年來,由于認知語言學的興起與發(fā)展,人們開始從認知的角度對隱喻進行深度的探討。LakoffJohnson(1987)率先表示,隱喻是建構(gòu)人們思想和行動的思維方式。他們在1980年出版的《我們賴以生存的隱喻》一書中提出概念隱喻理論,把概念隱喻分為三類：本體隱喻、結(jié)構(gòu)隱喻和方位隱喻,認為擬人隱喻是概念隱喻中本體隱喻的重要類型。從此,擬人隱喻的研究引起了研究者的關(guān)注。 20世紀90年代,Fauconnier和Turner等人創(chuàng)建的概念整合理論對自然語言意義建構(gòu)具有強大的解釋力,對隱喻的理解產(chǎn)生了重大的影響。與其它隱喻一樣,擬人隱喻同樣包含隱喻的認知和思維過程。但是傳統(tǒng)語言學多從修辭的角度來闡釋擬人隱喻,很少從認知的角度來解析擬人隱喻。本文以Fauconnier的概念整合思想為理論基礎(chǔ),以擬人隱喻為研究對象,將概念整合理論框架應(yīng)用到擬人隱喻的認知解讀過程中。通過運用概念整合理論對擬人隱喻進行研究,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)：一方面,體驗性是擬人隱喻的認知基礎(chǔ),通過身體體驗和心理體驗兩個方面進行運作；另一方面,概念整合理論作為普遍的認知機制不僅可以解釋擬人隱喻這種語言現(xiàn)象,而且對擬人隱喻進行動態(tài)地在線意義建構(gòu),建構(gòu)方式包括擬人隱喻的語義沖突、語義映射和語義合成；建構(gòu)類型基于概念整合理論的四種網(wǎng)絡(luò)模型構(gòu)成,即單一網(wǎng)絡(luò)、鏡像網(wǎng)絡(luò)、單域網(wǎng)絡(luò)和雙域網(wǎng)絡(luò)模型。這四種網(wǎng)絡(luò)模型按照各自的運作機制對擬人隱喻進行意義建構(gòu),揭示出理解擬人隱喻的認知過程。本文不僅論證概念整合是人類普遍存在的認知機制,而且為擬人隱喻的研究提供了一個新的研究視角。 本文由六個章節(jié)組成。第一章提出來總體觀點,闡明研究的背景,目的和意義,回顧研究的歷史與現(xiàn)狀,概述論文的結(jié)構(gòu)框架。第二章對擬人隱喻進行概述,介紹擬人隱喻的定義,分類和功能。第三章是文章的理論基礎(chǔ),即概念整合理論,系統(tǒng)地介紹了概念整合理論的發(fā)展過程、概念整合網(wǎng)絡(luò)模型、以及概念整合網(wǎng)絡(luò)的類型。第四章主要研究概念整合理論下擬人隱喻的認知基礎(chǔ),從身體體驗和心理體驗兩方面進行探討。第五章解析概念整合理論下擬人隱喻的意義建構(gòu),結(jié)合具體語言實例,論證擬人隱喻建構(gòu)方式包括：語義沖突,語義映射和語義整合,在概念整合理論的基礎(chǔ)上對擬人隱喻的建構(gòu)類型進行探究,結(jié)合概念整合的四個子網(wǎng)絡(luò),解析了幽默、政治、詩歌等相關(guān)聯(lián)的擬人隱喻,對擬人隱喻意義建構(gòu)的認知機制進行了詳盡的解釋,將其認知過程動態(tài)性地展示出來,論證了概念整合理論框架下擬人隱喻認知闡釋的可行性。
[Abstract]:Traditional linguistics regards metaphor as a linguistic phenomenon, as a rhetorical figure of language form and as a means of language decoration. From the ancient Greek Aristotle, people explore the mystery of metaphor from the perspective of rhetoric. In recent years, due to the rise and development of cognitive linguistics, people begin to explore metaphor from the perspective of cognition. LakoffJohnson 1987), it is the first to say that metaphor is a way of thinking to construct people's thoughts and actions. In their 1980 book metaphor for our existence, they put forward the theory of conceptual metaphor, which divides conceptual metaphor into three categories: Noumenon metaphor, structural metaphor and orientation metaphor. Personification metaphor is an important type of Noumenon metaphor in conceptual metaphor. Since then, the study of personification metaphor has attracted the attention of researchers. The conceptual integration theory developed by Fauconnier and Turner in the 1990s has a strong explanatory power to construct the meaning of natural language and has a great influence on the understanding of metaphor. Like other metaphors, anthropomorphic metaphors also contain the cognitive and thinking processes of metaphors. But the traditional linguistics interprets personification metaphor from the rhetorical point of view, and seldom from the cognitive angle to analyze the personification metaphor. Based on Fauconnier's idea of conceptual integration and taking personification metaphor as the object of study, this paper applies the theoretical framework of conceptual integration to the cognitive interpretation of anthropomorphic metaphor. By applying the theory of conceptual integration to the study of anthropomorphic metaphor, we find that, on the one hand, experience is the cognitive basis of anthropomorphic metaphor, which operates through both physical and psychological experiences; on the other hand, As a universal cognitive mechanism, Conceptual Integration Theory can not only explain the linguistic phenomenon of personification metaphor, but also dynamically construct the online meaning of personification metaphor, which includes semantic conflict, semantic mapping and semantic synthesis. Four kinds of network models based on conceptual integration theory are constructed, that is, single network, mirror network, single domain network and double domain network model. These four network models construct the meaning of personification metaphor according to their respective operation mechanism, and reveal the cognitive process of understanding personification metaphor. This paper not only demonstrates that conceptual integration is the universal cognitive mechanism of human beings, but also provides a new perspective for the study of anthropomorphic metaphors. This paper consists of six chapters. The first chapter presents the general viewpoint, explains the background, purpose and significance of the research, reviews the history and present situation of the research, and outlines the structural framework of the thesis. Chapter two introduces the definition, classification and function of personification metaphor. The third chapter is the theoretical basis of the article, that is, the conceptual integration theory. It systematically introduces the development process of the conceptual integration theory, the conceptual integration network model, and the types of conceptual integration network. The fourth chapter mainly studies the cognitive basis of personification metaphor in conceptual integration theory, and discusses it from two aspects: physical experience and psychological experience. The fifth chapter analyzes the meaning construction of personification metaphor in conceptual integration theory. Combining with specific language examples, the author demonstrates that the construction of personification metaphor includes semantic conflict, semantic mapping and semantic integration. On the basis of the theory of conceptual integration, this paper probes into the types of construction of personification metaphor, and analyzes the related personification metaphors such as humor, politics, poetry and so on, combined with the four sub-networks of conceptual integration. This paper gives a detailed explanation of the cognitive mechanism of the construction of anthropomorphic metaphorical meaning, displays its cognitive process dynamically, and proves the feasibility of the cognitive interpretation of personification metaphor under the framework of conceptual integration theory.
【學位授予單位】：湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H05

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張雪珠;郭金花;;擬人隱喻的語篇視角——從朱自清的《春》看擬人隱喻[J];當代教育理論與實踐;2011年12期

2 朱曉琴;;概念隱喻視角下擬人的構(gòu)建及其認知力[J];貴州大學學報(社會科學版);2010年02期

3 鐘長艷;;運用概念整合理論分析英語幽默言語[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學院學報(人文社會科學版);2010年03期

4 汪少華,鄭守疆;從合成空間理論看隱喻的意義建構(gòu)[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2000年06期

5 邵志洪;邵惟楘;;詞匯化擬人和修辭性擬人——英漢擬人法使用對比研究[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2007年02期

6 羅瑞球;蔣冰清;;擬人與概念隱喻的跨文化研究[J];牡丹江大學學報;2007年06期

7 黃曙光;;合成空間理論與隱喻[J];牡丹江大學學報;2007年06期

8 蔣冰清;;基于概念隱喻理論的擬人研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2007年03期

9 王斌;映射及其認知運作[J];外語研究;2001年03期

10 劉正光;隱喻映射的本質(zhì)特征[J];外語學刊;2003年03期

，

本文編號：1874493