本文選題：配價(jià)語(yǔ)法 + 三價(jià)動(dòng)詞��； 參考：《山東師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：從法國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)家特斯尼耶爾（Lucien Tesniere）把“價(jià)”概念引入語(yǔ)法研究中開(kāi)始，配價(jià)語(yǔ)法理論的研究已取得了階段性的研究成果。本文在前賢研究之上，提出自己對(duì)配價(jià)性質(zhì)的認(rèn)識(shí)和具體可操作的定價(jià)方法，并據(jù)此對(duì)孟琮的《漢語(yǔ)動(dòng)詞用法詞典》（1999年版）進(jìn)行了窮盡性的考察，運(yùn)用定量與定性，描寫和解釋，對(duì)比與比較等方法，統(tǒng)計(jì)出三價(jià)動(dòng)詞的數(shù)量，對(duì)三價(jià)動(dòng)詞進(jìn)行深入細(xì)致的分類和語(yǔ)義句法分析，使讀者對(duì)三價(jià)動(dòng)詞的本體特征有更為清晰的認(rèn)識(shí)。本文主要包括以下內(nèi)容： 第一章介紹了漢語(yǔ)配價(jià)語(yǔ)法理論和三價(jià)動(dòng)詞研究概況及存在問(wèn)題，從而揭示出本文的研究?jī)r(jià)值和實(shí)際意義。 第二章對(duì)三價(jià)動(dòng)詞進(jìn)行界定，從理論上提出配價(jià)的性質(zhì)和定價(jià)的具體方法，并以此為指導(dǎo)，定義三價(jià)動(dòng)詞，對(duì)孟琮的《漢語(yǔ)動(dòng)詞用法詞典》進(jìn)行窮盡性的考察，對(duì)考察得出的三價(jià)動(dòng)詞按意義歸為七類，得出三價(jià)動(dòng)詞表，為進(jìn)行詳盡的語(yǔ)義句法分析夯實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。 第三章根據(jù)三價(jià)動(dòng)詞“價(jià)”的不同隱含狀況，將三價(jià)動(dòng)詞分為強(qiáng)顯性、中顯性、弱顯性三價(jià)動(dòng)詞并分別定義，舉例分析，深入闡釋。 第四章對(duì)七類三價(jià)動(dòng)詞進(jìn)行深入語(yǔ)義句法分析，涉及動(dòng)詞及價(jià)的語(yǔ)義特征，主賓語(yǔ)在動(dòng)作過(guò)程中的得失情況，動(dòng)詞與價(jià)的領(lǐng)屬關(guān)系，動(dòng)詞構(gòu)詞分析，三價(jià)動(dòng)詞對(duì)句式的適應(yīng)情況等，并聯(lián)系不同類三價(jià)動(dòng)詞特殊性進(jìn)行深入特殊分析。 第五章是將漢語(yǔ)三價(jià)動(dòng)詞與英語(yǔ)進(jìn)行的比較分析，基本原則采用單向?qū)Ρ�，基本方法是從漢語(yǔ)出發(fā)，，考察漢語(yǔ)三價(jià)動(dòng)詞相對(duì)應(yīng)的英語(yǔ)動(dòng)詞，進(jìn)行二者間的比較，考察出它們的句法差異，配價(jià)差異等。 第六章對(duì)三價(jià)動(dòng)詞研究的歷史與現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了一些思考，對(duì)自己的研究成果及創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步總結(jié)。 配價(jià)理論的研究歷史悠久，成果頗豐并將繼續(xù)沿著更加深入細(xì)致的方向深入發(fā)展下去，本文僅據(jù)自己的理解，從配價(jià)角度切入進(jìn)行初步系統(tǒng)的論述，進(jìn)一步深入研究還有待于日后繼承成果，發(fā)現(xiàn)不足，拓寬領(lǐng)域，深入挖掘。
[Abstract]:Since Lucien Tesniereh, a French linguist, introduced the concept of "valence" into the study of grammar, the study of the theory of valence grammar has achieved some achievements. On the basis of the previous study, this paper puts forward his own understanding of the nature of valence and practical and operable pricing methods, and then makes an exhaustive investigation of Meng Cong's Dictionary of Chinese verb usage (1999 edition), using quantitative and qualitative methods. By means of description and explanation, contrast and comparison, the author counts out the number of trivalent verbs, classifies trivalent verbs and analyzes the semantic syntax of trivalent verbs, so that the readers have a clearer understanding of the ontological characteristics of trivalent verbs. This paper mainly includes the following contents: The first chapter introduces the theory of Chinese valence grammar and the research of trivalent verbs and its existing problems, thus revealing the research value and practical significance of this paper. The second chapter defines trivalent verbs, puts forward the nature of valence and the specific method of pricing theoretically, and defines trivalent verbs under the guidance of this, and makes an exhaustive investigation on Meng Cong's Dictionary of Chinese verb usage. The trivalent verbs are classified into seven categories according to their meanings, and a trivalent verb table is obtained to lay a solid foundation for the detailed semantic syntax analysis. The third chapter divides the trivalent verbs into strong dominant, middle dominant and weak dominant trivalent verbs according to the different implicit conditions of the trivalent verbs. The fourth chapter makes a deep semantic syntactic analysis of seven kinds of trivalent verbs, including the semantic characteristics of verbs and valence, the gain and loss of subject and object in the course of action, the relationship between verbs and valence, and the analysis of verb word-formation. The adaptation of trivalent verbs to sentence patterns and the particularity of different kinds of trivalent verbs are analyzed. The fifth chapter is the comparative analysis between Chinese trivalent verbs and English. The basic principle is unidirectional comparison. The basic method is to investigate the corresponding English verbs of Chinese trivalent verbs from Chinese, and to compare them. Their syntactic differences and valence differences were investigated. Chapter six gives some thoughts on the history and present situation of the study of trivalent verbs, and further summarizes its research achievements and innovations. The study of pricing theory has a long history, and will continue to develop in a more thorough and meticulous direction. This paper, according to its own understanding, makes a preliminary and systematic discussion from the perspective of pricing. Further in-depth research is still to be carried out in the future, find the deficiencies, broaden the field, dig in depth.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H146.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱景松;;與工具成分有關(guān)的幾種句法格式——兼談加工制作義動(dòng)詞“價(jià)”的分析[J];安徽師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1992年03期

2 周國(guó)光,黎洪;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)制作動(dòng)詞的配價(jià)研究[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

3 謝鳳萍;給予動(dòng)詞的配價(jià)研究[J];安徽師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年01期

4 鄭維;;英漢雙賓語(yǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)的對(duì)比分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

5 胡偉;;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中三價(jià)動(dòng)詞的判定[J];長(zhǎng)春教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

6 張葉紅;;漢俄三價(jià)動(dòng)作動(dòng)詞配價(jià)對(duì)比分析[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

7 楊玲;動(dòng)詞配價(jià)成分的句法位置及相關(guān)問(wèn)題[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

8 唐智燕;論今文《尚書》的三價(jià)動(dòng)詞[J];長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

9 徐永生;配價(jià)語(yǔ)法理論引發(fā)的有關(guān)問(wèn)題的思考[J];滁州職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

10 馮志偉;;特思尼耶爾的從屬關(guān)系語(yǔ)法[J];國(guó)外語(yǔ)言學(xué);1983年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 劉寧?kù)o;張衛(wèi)國(guó);;動(dòng)詞配價(jià)的確定原則及三價(jià)動(dòng)詞再分類探索[A];內(nèi)容計(jì)算的研究與應(yīng)用前沿——第九屆全國(guó)計(jì)算語(yǔ)言學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 延俊榮;給予句研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 杜克華;三價(jià)動(dòng)詞及其相關(guān)句型[D];四川師范大學(xué);2003年

2 張葉紅;俄語(yǔ)動(dòng)詞的配價(jià)分析及其應(yīng)用[D];東北師范大學(xué);2004年

3 羅夢(mèng)鹿;雙賓語(yǔ)句式動(dòng)詞的配價(jià)研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1865688