本文選題：圖像轉(zhuǎn)向 + 圖像符號(hào)學(xué)�。� 參考：《社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線》2012年10期

【摘要】：米切爾"圖像轉(zhuǎn)向"成為世界性熱門話題,并帶出了"后符號(hào)學(xué)"的論題。他提出,符號(hào)學(xué)已經(jīng)無(wú)法解決基于"像似性"基礎(chǔ)上的圖像問(wèn)題。文章從像似性入手,分析了絕似、鏡像、副本、重合等極端情況的圖像表意,并得出了"像似性并不否定圖像的符號(hào)性"這一結(jié)論。進(jìn)而推知圖像轉(zhuǎn)向并不否定符號(hào)學(xué)對(duì)當(dāng)代圖像研究的有效性。米切爾論點(diǎn)的意義在于,圖像研究需要建立一門以當(dāng)代傳媒視覺景觀為對(duì)象的"圖像符號(hào)學(xué)",而符號(hào)學(xué)則可借助"圖像符號(hào)模式"從"語(yǔ)言符號(hào)學(xué)"更徹底地轉(zhuǎn)向一般文化符號(hào)學(xué)。
[Abstract]:Mitchell's "Image turn" has become a hot topic in the world, and has brought out the topic of "Post-semiotics". He proposed that semiotics can no longer solve the image problem based on iconicity. Starting with iconicity, this paper analyzes the image ideologies of extreme cases such as iconicity, mirroring, replica and coincidence, and draws the conclusion that iconicity does not negate the symbolism of images. Then we can infer that image turning does not negate the validity of semiotics in contemporary image research. The point of the Mitchell argument is, Image research needs to establish an "image semiotics" which takes the visual landscape of contemporary media as the object, and semiology can turn to general cultural semiotics more thoroughly by means of "image symbol mode" from "language semiotics" to "general cultural semiotics".
【作者單位】： 桂林電子科技大學(xué)藝術(shù)與設(shè)計(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目西部項(xiàng)目(11XWW001) 廣西哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(11FXW005)
【分類號(hào)】：H0

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李永東;現(xiàn)代家族小說(shuō)的“圍城”敘事[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

2 陳玉錫;李靜;;符號(hào)學(xué)理論在紀(jì)念性景觀設(shè)計(jì)中的應(yīng)用[J];安徽農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào)(上半月刊);2009年09期

3 張曉s，

本文編號(hào)：1855592