本文選題：查爾莫斯 + 二維語義學(xué)��； 參考：《廣西大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：關(guān)于心-身問題的哲學(xué)研究中有著三個(gè)核心概念——意義、理性和模態(tài)。通過康德命題、新弗雷格命題以及卡爾納普命題,這三個(gè)人類認(rèn)識(shí)過程中的重要概念聯(lián)系了起來,這即是黃金三角。而隨著克里普克對(duì)康德命題中先天必然性的批判,黃金三角就此破裂。但許多哲學(xué)家仍然嘗試使用意義、理性和模態(tài)三個(gè)核心概念為基礎(chǔ)來解釋人類的認(rèn)知過程,他們實(shí)際上發(fā)現(xiàn)了問題具有不同的維度。其中斯多納克揭示了另一個(gè)維度的模態(tài)的可能；卡普蘭發(fā)現(xiàn)了先天必然的新聯(lián)系；埃文斯發(fā)現(xiàn)了一種深層的必然性；戴維斯和漢波斯通則通過二維算子的定義擴(kuò)展了現(xiàn)實(shí)世界及可能世界；杰克遜提出了A內(nèi)涵和C內(nèi)涵的理論。 查爾莫斯提出一個(gè)具有普遍意義的二維體系理論,在查爾莫斯的二維語義構(gòu)建中他將卡爾納普命題以及新弗雷格命題二維化,從而在一個(gè)二維的意義上恢復(fù)了黃金三角。查爾莫斯的論述雖然不是很完善,但他至少在某種意義上恢復(fù)了黃金三角,或者是說擴(kuò)展了黃金三角。 未來二維語義學(xué)的發(fā)展具有無限的可能,之前對(duì)意義、理性與模態(tài)三個(gè)概念的探討實(shí)際上應(yīng)該屬于某種無限的語義學(xué)中的一部分。而關(guān)于人類如何認(rèn)識(shí)外部世界這個(gè)問題的解答并不是一勞永逸的,我們實(shí)際上無法做出某種有限回答,因?yàn)檫@個(gè)問題涉及到認(rèn)知主體自身。既然認(rèn)知主體自身中所具有的思想在理論上是無限的,那么反身問道認(rèn)知主體如何認(rèn)知這樣的問題在理論上也應(yīng)該可以無限展開。而其中的每一個(gè)展開的可能都可以成為一種語義學(xué),并形成一個(gè)新的概念三角。
[Abstract]:There are three core concepts in the philosophical study of mind-body-meaning, rationality and mode.Through the Kant proposition, the new Frege proposition and the Rudolf Carnap proposition, the three important concepts in the process of human cognition are connected together, which is called the Golden Triangle.With Kripke's critique of the innate inevitability of Kant's proposition, the Golden Triangle broke down.However, many philosophers still try to explain human cognitive processes based on the three core concepts of meaning, rationality and mode. In fact, they find that problems have different dimensions.Among them, Stokes reveals the possibility of the modal of another dimension, Kaplan discovers the new connection of innate necessity, Evans discovers a kind of deep inevitability.Davis and Hampers expand the real world and possible world through the definition of two-dimensional operators, and Jackson put forward the theory of "A connotation" and "C" connotation.Charmoss put forward a universal theory of two-dimensional system. In the construction of two dimensional semantics of Charmos, he changed the Rudolf Carnap proposition and the new Frege proposition into two dimensions, thus restoring the golden triangle in a two-dimensional sense.Though not perfect, Charmos restored the Golden Triangle at least in a way, or expanded it.In the future, the development of two-dimensional semantics has unlimited possibilities. The discussion of the three concepts of meaning, rationality and mode should actually be part of some infinite semantics.But the answer to the question of how human beings perceive the outside world is not once and for all, and we can't actually give some limited answer because it involves the cognitive subject itself.Since the thought in the cognitive subject itself is infinite in theory, the question of how the cognitive subject can be cognized by the reflexive body should be unbounded in theory.Each of them can become a semantics and form a new concept triangle.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H0-05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 朱建平;;從弗雷格到查爾默斯——二維語義學(xué)的理論發(fā)展[J];南陽理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

2 蕢益民;;可想象性論證與后天必然性[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

3 蕢益民;;二維語義學(xué)及其認(rèn)知內(nèi)涵概念[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2007年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1732504