本文選題：評(píng)價(jià)理論　切入點(diǎn)：微博　出處：《山西大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：微博被認(rèn)為是最重要的大眾媒體之一,涉及社會(huì)各領(lǐng)域階層。微博是博客的另一種形式,但有別于博客,微博將字?jǐn)?shù)嚴(yán)格限制在140個(gè)字符以內(nèi)。作者試圖利用Martin的評(píng)價(jià)理論找出微博語(yǔ)篇在態(tài)度資源中的特征與規(guī)律。 評(píng)價(jià)理論劃分為三個(gè)子系統(tǒng)：態(tài)度、介入和級(jí)差。在微博語(yǔ)篇中,態(tài)度資源分布主要有以下發(fā)現(xiàn)：1,微博語(yǔ)篇中蘊(yùn)含著大量的態(tài)度意義資源。態(tài)度資源的子系統(tǒng)—情感、判斷與鑒賞分布并不均勻,微博用戶更傾向于使用鑒賞性語(yǔ)言(占總態(tài)度資源用語(yǔ)的67.9%),隨后是情感用語(yǔ)(21.2%)和判斷用語(yǔ)(10.9%)。2,在鑒賞性態(tài)度意義中,針對(duì)某一事件微博用戶更偏向使用評(píng)價(jià)性語(yǔ)言(37.2%),用以表達(dá)自己對(duì)這一事件的認(rèn)同程度。其占有率遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于其他兩個(gè)鑒賞子系統(tǒng)：反應(yīng)(13.4%)與構(gòu)成(11.5%)。3,情感性語(yǔ)言在微博用戶使用過(guò)程中不可或缺,其中滿意度的情感占到了9.0%的比例。針對(duì)“黃燈是否應(yīng)該重罰”事件,許多用戶通過(guò)滿意與否來(lái)表達(dá)對(duì)此的支持或反對(duì)。4,判斷性語(yǔ)言在微博語(yǔ)篇中所占比重最小,但正常性也占到了整個(gè)語(yǔ)料的4.5%。由此可知,在微博語(yǔ)篇中,鑒賞性態(tài)度意義是被廣大微博客使用最多的,超過(guò)了情感用語(yǔ)以及判斷用語(yǔ)。進(jìn)而我們可以得到推論,微博客在微博中更多的是表達(dá)自己對(duì)某一事件或人物的鑒賞而非情感和判斷。 本文由五個(gè)章節(jié)組成：第一章介紹研究背景,提出了研究的意義,以及論文的組織框架。第二章文獻(xiàn)綜述闡明了評(píng)價(jià)理論體系研究歷程,以及對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言以及微博語(yǔ)篇進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要回顧。第三章是理論框架,作為理論支撐第四章的案例分析。第四章是文章的主體部分,主要由研究設(shè)計(jì)和數(shù)據(jù)分析以及微博的社會(huì)意義構(gòu)成。本文的語(yǔ)料庫(kù)由150條微博語(yǔ)篇資源構(gòu)成。最后第五章總結(jié)了全文的主要內(nèi)容,并表明了研究的局限性以及對(duì)微博語(yǔ)篇這一領(lǐng)域的更進(jìn)一步研究工作的建議。
[Abstract]:Weibo is regarded as one of the most important mass media, involving all sectors of society. Weibo is another form of blog, but different from blog. Weibo strictly limits the number of words to 140 characters. The author tries to find out the characteristics and rules of Weibo discourse in attitude resources by using Martin's evaluation theory. The theory of evaluation is divided into three subsystems: attitude, intervention and differential. In Weibo discourse, the distribution of attitude resources mainly includes the following findings: 1: 1, Weibo discourse contains a large number of resources of attitude meaning, and the subsystem of attitude resources-emotion. The distribution of judgment and appreciation is not uniform. Weibo users tend to use appreciative language (67.9% of total attitude resources, followed by emotional language 21.2g) and judgment language 10.9 / 2. In the meaning of appreciation attitude, Weibo users tend to use appreciative language (67.9% of total attitude resources, followed by emotional language 21.2g). Weibo users prefer to use evaluative language to express their approval of the incident. Their occupation rate is much higher than that of the other two appreciation subsystems: reaction 13.4g) and composition 11.55.3.The affective language is small. Blog users use the process is indispensable, Among them, the proportion of satisfaction is 9.0%. In view of the "Yellow Lantern should be heavily punished" event, many users express their support or opposition to it through whether they are satisfied or not, and the judging language accounts for the least proportion in Weibo's discourse. However, normality also accounts for 4.5% of the whole corpus. From this, we can see that appreciation attitude is the most commonly used by the vast majority of Weibo guests in Weibo discourse, which exceeds emotional language and judgment language. Then we can draw a conclusion. Weibo expresses his appreciation of an event or character more than his feelings and judgments in Weibo. This paper is composed of five chapters: the first chapter introduces the research background, the significance of the research, and the organizational framework of the paper. The third chapter is the theoretical framework, as the theoretical support of the fourth chapter of the case analysis. Chapter four is the main part of the article. It consists of research design, data analysis and Weibo's social significance. The corpus of this paper is composed of 150 textual resources. Finally, the fifth chapter summarizes the main contents of the thesis. The limitations of the study and suggestions for further research in the field of Weibo discourse are also indicated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭遠(yuǎn)漢;關(guān)于“網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言”[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

2 李經(jīng)偉;英漢書(shū)評(píng)中的禮貌策略比較[J];解放軍外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1996年03期

3 隋佳言;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言探析[J];遼寧教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年07期

4 曹旺儒;;社會(huì)語(yǔ)言學(xué)視野中的網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

5 李戰(zhàn)子;評(píng)價(jià)理論:在話語(yǔ)分析中的應(yīng)用和問(wèn)題[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2004年05期

6 朱洪濤;英語(yǔ)廣告語(yǔ)篇中人稱、語(yǔ)氣的人際功能[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2003年02期

7 王振華;“硬新聞”的態(tài)度研究——“評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)”應(yīng)用研究之二[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2004年05期

8 王振華;評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)及其運(yùn)作——系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)言學(xué)的新發(fā)展[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2001年06期

9 唐麗萍;學(xué)術(shù)書(shū)評(píng)語(yǔ)類結(jié)構(gòu)的評(píng)價(jià)分析[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2004年03期

10 周軍,楚軍;新聞報(bào)道英語(yǔ)與社論英語(yǔ)的功能語(yǔ)篇分析[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 周霜艷;從社會(huì)語(yǔ)言學(xué)視角論網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)言[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2003年

2 劉海燕;語(yǔ)域理論模式下的BBS論壇語(yǔ)言[D];北京語(yǔ)言大學(xué);2007年

3 杜夫利;“臉譜網(wǎng)”語(yǔ)篇的語(yǔ)言學(xué)特征及其社會(huì)文化背景[D];青島大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1650994