本文選題：《左傳》　切入點(diǎn)：單音節(jié)反義動(dòng)詞　出處：《華中科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：《左傳》是先秦時(shí)期的重要著作，代表了先秦語(yǔ)言發(fā)展的高度。該書擁有豐富的反義動(dòng)詞，也具備較為完整的動(dòng)詞表現(xiàn)形態(tài)。因此通過(guò)對(duì)《左傳》單音節(jié)反義動(dòng)詞進(jìn)行研究，可以探尋先秦時(shí)期的語(yǔ)言特點(diǎn)，總結(jié)構(gòu)成反義的條件和反義動(dòng)詞的使用特點(diǎn)，并可進(jìn)一步體會(huì)當(dāng)時(shí)社會(huì)下人們的思維規(guī)律和語(yǔ)言的思辨色彩。 本文對(duì)反義動(dòng)詞作了盡可能全面的分析。 第一章引言部分描述了《左傳》反義詞的研究現(xiàn)狀，在前人著作的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)書中單音節(jié)反義動(dòng)詞進(jìn)行窮盡式統(tǒng)計(jì)，通過(guò)查閱全文，發(fā)現(xiàn)28組未被前人指出的反義動(dòng)詞，，并把它們補(bǔ)充進(jìn)去作為研究對(duì)象，采取統(tǒng)計(jì)、描寫和對(duì)比分析等方法，以大量語(yǔ)言事實(shí)為基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行歸納、研究。 第二章從詞義特征、反義對(duì)應(yīng)關(guān)系、使用頻率等角度對(duì)反義動(dòng)詞進(jìn)行分類，對(duì)補(bǔ)充反義詞進(jìn)行整理，并提出確定這部分反義動(dòng)詞的方式。 第三章討論了反義動(dòng)詞之間的對(duì)立關(guān)系，分析詞義以及詞義變化引起的反義聚合關(guān)系的變化。從動(dòng)詞的不同語(yǔ)法形態(tài)出發(fā)探討反義動(dòng)詞的對(duì)稱性和不對(duì)稱性，由此總結(jié)反義動(dòng)詞的語(yǔ)法特點(diǎn)。在全文范圍內(nèi)確定反義動(dòng)詞的分布位置，分析反義動(dòng)詞的語(yǔ)法功能。 第四章描述了反義動(dòng)詞在釋義、語(yǔ)法、修辭等方面的作用和意義。 最后是總結(jié)，每對(duì)反義動(dòng)詞都是一種反義概念，體現(xiàn)了先秦時(shí)期人們的語(yǔ)言習(xí)慣和思維習(xí)慣，對(duì)反義動(dòng)詞的研究就是以此為出發(fā)點(diǎn)來(lái)探討當(dāng)時(shí)的語(yǔ)言特征和概念。受種種因素限制，本文還存在一些不足之處，有待在以后的研究中不斷改正和完善。
[Abstract]:Zuo Zhuan is an important work of the pre-Qin period, which represents the height of the development of the pre-Qin language. The book has abundant antisense verbs and relatively complete forms of verb expression. Therefore, through the study of the monosyllabic antisense verbs in Zuo Zhuan, We can explore the language characteristics of the pre-Qin period, summarize the conditions for the formation of antisense and the characteristics of the use of antisense verbs, and further understand the thinking law and the speculative color of the language in the society at that time. This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of antonyms as far as possible. The first chapter describes the current situation of the study of antonyms in Zuo Zhuan. On the basis of previous works, the author makes exhaustive statistics on monosyllabic antisense verbs in the book, and finds out 28 groups of antisense verbs that have not been pointed out by their predecessors. Taking them as the research object, the author adopts the methods of statistics, description and contrastive analysis, and sums up and studies them on the basis of a large number of linguistic facts. The second chapter classifies the antisense verbs from the aspects of semantic features, antisense correspondence and frequency, and puts forward the ways to determine the antonyms. The third chapter discusses the opposites between antisense verbs, analyzes the changes of the antonym aggregation relation caused by the change of word meaning, and probes into the symmetry and asymmetry of antisense verbs from different grammatical forms of verbs. This paper summarizes the grammatical characteristics of antisense verbs, determines the distribution of antisense verbs in the scope of the full text, and analyzes the grammatical functions of antisense verbs. Chapter 4th describes the role and significance of antisense verbs in interpretation, grammar and rhetoric. Finally, it is concluded that each pair of antisense verbs is an antisense concept, which reflects the language habits and thinking habits of people in the pre-Qin period. The study of antisense verbs is to explore the language characteristics and concepts at that time. Due to various factors, there are still some deficiencies in this paper, which need to be constantly corrected and improved in the future research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H131

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐靜;;關(guān)于詞語(yǔ)對(duì)立的一些基本問題[J];北方文學(xué)(下半月);2010年04期

2 О.М.Соколов;劉援朝;;論詞義對(duì)立和與其毗連現(xiàn)象的關(guān)系[J];國(guó)外語(yǔ)言學(xué);1983年02期

3 余行達(dá);讀《左傳詞匯研究》后記[J];阿壩師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

4 李晶晶;;淺談漢語(yǔ)反義詞的修辭效果[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年12期

5 陳克炯;;《左傳》詞匯簡(jiǎn)論[J];華中師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1982年01期

6 王兆鵬;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)的使動(dòng)用法[J];漢字文化;2002年04期

7 王冰,徐正考;古漢語(yǔ)反義詞研究初探[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

8 華旭;反義詞判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究述評(píng)[J];山東師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1992年01期

9 劉叔新;;漢語(yǔ)反義詞語(yǔ)的類別和特點(diǎn)[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);1988年03期

10 陳淑美;;語(yǔ)言的經(jīng)濟(jì)性原則在漢語(yǔ)中的體現(xiàn)[J];韶關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年10期

本文編號(hào)：1599060