本文選題：不是N的N　切入點(diǎn)：構(gòu)式　出處：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文的研究對(duì)象是現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中的一個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)“不是N的N”。本文從“構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法”的角度對(duì)該結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行描寫與解釋,試圖從結(jié)構(gòu)、語(yǔ)義、功能三個(gè)角度對(duì)“不是N的N”進(jìn)行分析,得出進(jìn)入該結(jié)構(gòu)“N”的限制條件,并嘗試從認(rèn)知、隱喻和語(yǔ)用的角度對(duì)“不是N的N”結(jié)構(gòu)的形成做出解釋。 首先,對(duì)“不是N的N”的結(jié)構(gòu)組成成分進(jìn)行分析,從結(jié)構(gòu)的非可派生性、結(jié)構(gòu)的非可推性及結(jié)構(gòu)的相對(duì)固定性三個(gè)方面對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)“不是N的N”進(jìn)行構(gòu)式判定,并根據(jù)語(yǔ)境歸納出“不是N的N”的構(gòu)式義為：無(wú)N之名,有N之實(shí)。本文對(duì)進(jìn)入結(jié)構(gòu)的“N”從音節(jié)、結(jié)構(gòu)類型和語(yǔ)義角度進(jìn)行了分類。將“N”按照音節(jié)分類,可進(jìn)入該結(jié)構(gòu)的“N”的類別有：?jiǎn)我艄?jié)名詞、雙音節(jié)名詞和多音節(jié)名詞,其中,雙音節(jié)名詞占優(yōu)。將“N”按結(jié)構(gòu)類型分類,可進(jìn)入該結(jié)構(gòu)的“N”的主要類型有：偏正結(jié)構(gòu)、聯(lián)合結(jié)構(gòu)。將“N”按照語(yǔ)義分類,可進(jìn)入結(jié)構(gòu)的“N”類別有：抽象名詞、歧義名詞、稱謂名詞、集合名詞、同義名詞和身體器官名詞。6類中,抽象名詞和歧義名詞進(jìn)入“不是N的N”占優(yōu)。本文還將“不是N的N”與相關(guān)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要對(duì)比。 其次,本文從句法和語(yǔ)義角度對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)“不是N的N”進(jìn)行了分析。從句法角度看,“不是N的N”在旬中擔(dān)任主語(yǔ)和賓語(yǔ)。其中,結(jié)構(gòu)作賓語(yǔ)占優(yōu)勢(shì)。該結(jié)構(gòu)也可單獨(dú)作標(biāo)題�！安皇荖的N”可進(jìn)入的旬類有：陳述句、問(wèn)句和感嘆句。結(jié)構(gòu)中兩個(gè)N意義范疇不同�！癗1”是指N的外延義,“N2”指N的內(nèi)涵義。兩個(gè)N的指稱義也不同,N1是有指性的。N2是無(wú)指性的�！安皇荖的N”結(jié)構(gòu)本身具有主觀性、非典型義、強(qiáng)調(diào)性和模糊性等語(yǔ)義特征。 最后,從認(rèn)知、隱喻和語(yǔ)用的角度對(duì)構(gòu)式“不是N的N”的成因進(jìn)行分析。從認(rèn)知角度來(lái)看,人類對(duì)于“不是N的N”的認(rèn)知依賴于人類自身對(duì)于“N”的認(rèn)知�！安皇荖的N”含有比較義,因此具有一定的隱喻功能。這種隱喻功能符合人對(duì)事物的認(rèn)知,是對(duì)人類思維的一種印證,也是語(yǔ)義和語(yǔ)法的互競(jìng)的結(jié)果。構(gòu)式與語(yǔ)用關(guān)系緊密,語(yǔ)用也是“不是N的N”結(jié)構(gòu)形成的原因之一�！安皇荖的N”符合語(yǔ)用中的語(yǔ)言的經(jīng)濟(jì)性、語(yǔ)言的主觀性和言語(yǔ)創(chuàng)新的需要。 本文從形式出發(fā)著重對(duì)意義進(jìn)行探究,從結(jié)構(gòu)出發(fā)著重對(duì)功能進(jìn)行考察。同時(shí),結(jié)合多種理論,從多個(gè)角度對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行考察。本文對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)“不是N的N”做出了較為系統(tǒng)、全面的總結(jié),希望通過(guò)本文能加深對(duì)現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中一些固定結(jié)構(gòu)的認(rèn)識(shí)。
[Abstract]:The research object of this paper is a structure "not N of N" in modern Chinese. This paper describes and interprets the structure from the angle of "construction grammar", and attempts to analyze "N not of N" from three angles of structure, semantics and function. The restrictive conditions of entering the structure "N" are obtained, and the formation of "not N of N" structure is explained from cognitive, metaphorical and pragmatic perspectives. First of all, the structural composition of "N is not N" is analyzed, and the structure "N is not N" is determined from three aspects: the non-distributive nature of the structure, the non-pushability of the structure and the relative fixation of the structure. The construction meaning of "N is not N" is summed up according to the context: "N" has the name of "N" and "N" is true. "N" is classified in terms of syllable, structural type and semantics. "N" is classified according to syllable, and "N" is classified according to syllable. The categories of "N" that can enter the structure are: monosyllabic nouns, disyllabic nouns and polysyllabic nouns, of which the disyllabic nouns are dominant. Joint structure. The categories of "N" that can be entered into the structure by semantic classification are: abstract nouns, ambiguous nouns, appellation nouns, collective nouns, synonymous nouns and body organs noun classes .6, Abstract nouns and ambiguous nouns are predominated by "N is not N". This paper also briefly compares "N not N" with related structures. Secondly, this paper analyzes the structure "N is not N" from syntactic and semantic angles. From the syntactic point of view, "N not N" acts as subject and object in ten days. Structure is the dominant object. The structure can also be used as a separate title. "N other than N" can be entered into the following categories: declarative sentences, Questions and exclamatory sentences. Two N meaning categories are different in structure. "N1" refers to the denotation of N, "N2" refers to the connotative meaning of N, and the referential meanings of two N are also different. N1 is referential. N2 is apocalyptic. The "N not N" structure itself is subjective. Semantic features such as atypical meaning, emphasis and fuzziness. Finally, from the cognitive, metaphorical and pragmatic perspectives, the causes of the construction of "not N" are analyzed. Human cognition of "N is not N" depends on the cognition of "N". "N is not N" has comparative meaning, so it has a certain metaphorical function. This metaphorical function accords with human cognition of things. Construction is closely related to pragmatics, and pragmatics is one of the reasons for the formation of "not N's N" structure. "not N's N" conforms to the economy of language in pragmatics. The subjectivity of language and the need of language innovation. This paper explores meaning from form and function from structure. At the same time, combined with various theories, it examines structure from many angles. This paper makes a systematic study on structure "N is not N". A comprehensive summary, I hope this paper can deepen the understanding of some fixed structures in modern Chinese.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 M.Fried;Jan-Ola 銉stman;牛保義;;《構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法的跨語(yǔ)言研究》述評(píng)[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);2006年04期

2 胡裕樹 ,范曉;試論語(yǔ)法研究的三個(gè)平面[J];新疆師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1985年02期

3 錢書新;;名詞從名物義到性質(zhì)義的句法規(guī)約及其理?yè)?jù)[J];現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)文(語(yǔ)言研究版);2011年02期

4 譚景春;;名形詞類轉(zhuǎn)變的語(yǔ)義基礎(chǔ)及相關(guān)問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;1998年05期

5 張伯江;;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)的雙及物結(jié)構(gòu)式[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;1999年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1565492