本文關(guān)鍵詞： 早期感受性 延遲感受性 語言水平 話題熟悉度 自定步速逐塊閱讀任務(wù)　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：語篇閱讀信息加工過程研究方面最有影響的理論有建構(gòu)主義理論、最小假設(shè)理論和記憶基礎(chǔ)文本加工理論。三大理論在閱讀過程推理的類型,文本連貫的表征水平和文本整體連貫獲得的機制方面存在分歧。本研究意在探索三個水平的中國英語學(xué)習(xí)者在矛盾句語篇閱讀中會產(chǎn)生早期感受性還是延遲感受性以驗證三大理論在連貫性機制方面在二語閱讀中的適用性；本研究還檢測了語言水平和話題熟悉度對矛盾句語篇閱讀是否存在影響。 本研究為在線研究,采用自定步速逐塊閱讀的方法,利用E-prime軟件記錄三個關(guān)鍵區(qū)域的的閱讀時間,通過對閱讀時間的考察以探測矛盾句語篇閱讀的推理機制。實驗以高、中、低三組共60名不同英語水平的中國英語學(xué)習(xí)者為研究對象,實驗材料分為實驗版本(矛盾版本)和控制版本(一致版本),比較同一水平組兩個版本的三個閱讀時間以及不同水平組同一版本的三個閱讀時間。 實驗數(shù)據(jù)利用(SPSS)13.0進行重復(fù)測量方差分析,主效應(yīng)采用事后檢驗的方法進一步分析,交互作用采用簡單效應(yīng)分析的方法進行進一步分析。采用皮爾遜相關(guān)分析檢驗話題熟悉度和閱讀時間是否存在關(guān)聯(lián)。 經(jīng)過數(shù)據(jù)分析得出以下結(jié)論：1.三個水平組都出現(xiàn)了早期感受性現(xiàn)象,驗證了建構(gòu)主義的更新追隨假設(shè)和記憶基礎(chǔ)文本加工理論關(guān)于局部連貫中斷的即時感受性的假設(shè)。2.高水平組讀者同時出現(xiàn)了延遲感受性,可能是由于高水平讀者具有更大的認知容量,在矛盾閱讀結(jié)束之后,仍然尋找線索驗證之前的推理,出現(xiàn)時間的延遲。3.高、中水平組在關(guān)鍵句后句沒有出現(xiàn)時間延遲,驗證了更新追隨假設(shè)；低水平組在關(guān)鍵句后句仍然出現(xiàn)了時間的延遲,驗證了記憶基礎(chǔ)加工理論。高語言水平讀者在閱讀中采用積極的策略的閱讀方法,不需推理也能產(chǎn)生有意義的文本表征的情況下,讀者不采用推理：低水平讀者采用的是消極共振的方法進行語篇閱讀,不論需不需要推理,讀者都自動的連續(xù)的進行消極共振整合信息。4.三個水平組讀者都產(chǎn)生早期感受性,說明語言水平與矛盾句語篇閱讀早期感受性無關(guān)。語言水平對矛盾版本三個區(qū)域的閱讀時間有一定的影響,說明語言水平影響矛盾句語篇閱讀的推理過程。5.話題熟悉度對一致版本的三個閱讀時間有顯著關(guān)聯(lián),但是只與矛盾版本的目標(biāo)句后句區(qū)域有顯著關(guān)聯(lián)。這可能是因為在矛盾版本推理過程中,讀者耗費更多的認知資源處理前后文的連貫推理,忽略的背景知識的結(jié)合。
[Abstract]:The most influential theories in the study of text reading information processing are constructivism theory, minimum hypothesis theory and memory-based text processing theory. The purpose of this study is to explore whether Chinese EFL learners at three levels produce early receptivity or delayed perception in the reading of contradictory sentences. Sex verifies the applicability of the three theories in second language reading in terms of coherence mechanism; The present study also examines whether language proficiency and topic familiarity affect discourse reading of contradictory sentences. This study is an online study, using the method of self-paced block by block reading, using E-prime software to record the reading time of three key regions, and exploring the inference mechanism of text reading of contradictory sentences by examining the reading time. A total of 60 Chinese EFL learners with different English proficiency were selected as subjects. The experimental materials are divided into experimental version (contradictory version) and control version (consistent version). The three reading times of two versions of the same level group and three reading times of the same version of different level group are compared. The experimental data were analyzed by repeated measurement variance analysis using SPSS 13.0, and the main effect was further analyzed by the method of post-test. The interaction was further analyzed by simple effect analysis. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine whether the familiarity of topic and reading time were related. Through the analysis of the data, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. All the three levels have the phenomenon of early receptivity. It verifies the supposition of constructivist renewal following hypothesis and memory-based text processing theory about the instant receptivity of local coherence interruption. 2. The high level readers have delayed receptivity at the same time. This may be due to the higher cognitive capacity of the high-level readers. After the contradictory reading, they are still looking for clues to verify the reasoning before, the delay of time appears .3.High, and the middle level group has no time delay after the key sentence. It verifies the hypothesis of update following; the low level group still has a delay in time after the key sentence, which verifies the basic processing theory of memory. In the case of meaningful textual representation without inference, the reader does not use inference: the low level reader uses a negative resonance method for text reading, whether or not inference is required. Readers are automatically performing continuous negative resonance integration of information. 4. All three levels of readers have early receptivity. It shows that language proficiency has nothing to do with the early receptivity of contradictory sentence texts. Language proficiency has a certain effect on the reading time of the three regions of contradictory versions. 5. Topic familiarity is significantly related to the three reading times of the consistent version. This may be due to the fact that the reader spends more cognitive resources to deal with the coherent reasoning of the text and neglects the combination of background knowledge.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H0-05

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 周紅,徐勇;二語語篇理解預(yù)期推理在線研究——來自命名實驗和矛盾句閱讀實驗的綜合證據(jù)[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2004年02期

，

本文編號：1554494