天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當前位置:主頁 > 文藝論文 > 藝術理論論文 >

新時期文學審美本質論的提出與發(fā)展研究

發(fā)布時間:2019-06-26 16:43
【摘要】:文學審美本質論是20世紀80年代在我國出現(xiàn)的一種新的文學本質觀,其產生于新時期主流意識形態(tài)淡出和審美本質化開始反思的時期。它從一個不同于以往的角度即審美的角度出發(fā)來解析文學的本質,力求把文學的審美屬性與意識形態(tài)屬性結合在一起,提出文學的本質是“審美意識形態(tài)”,文學審美本質論是新時期文藝理論發(fā)展的重要新成果。 第一章,新時期文學審美本質論產生的社會歷史背景。新時期之初,政治對文學粗暴干預的結束給文學的發(fā)展創(chuàng)造了相對寬松的社會環(huán)境,使文學理論界確立了“文學是人學”的命題。同時,在西方文藝美學、蘇聯(lián)“審美學派”理論及我國自古而來的審美體驗傳統(tǒng)等理論語境的熏陶下,文學審美本質論應運而生。 第二章,新時期文學審美本質論提出的過程及提出的重要意義。文學審美本質論并非一人一時提出來的,首先是童慶炳先生提出文學的基本特征是審美,接著錢中文先生在此基礎上于1984年正式提出文學的本質是“審美意識形態(tài)”,并對其內涵進行了分析。文學審美本質論的提出對新時期文藝理論研究的意義是巨大的,它是一代學人集體理論創(chuàng)新的結晶,較之“文藝為政治服務”的口號更能體現(xiàn)文藝自身的發(fā)展規(guī)律。 第三章,審美本質論理論厚度的增強和審美本質論進入文學理論教材,這兩個方面顯示了新時期文學審美本質論的初步成熟。在20世紀80年代末,文學審美本質論者繼續(xù)對文學的審美特征作了進一步地闡述,又對80年代另一重要的學說“審美反映說”進行了深入的闡釋,豐富了審美本質論的理論內涵。文學審美本質論從80年代進入一本文學理論教材到90年代進入多本文學理論教材,其理論本身的權威性和普遍性在不斷增強。 第四章,文學審美本質論在遭遇并應對全面質疑的過程中繼續(xù)走向深化。從20世紀90年代末開始,文學審美本質論就遭到了零星的批評。進入到新世紀,則遭到了以董學文、陸貴山為代表的多位學者的質疑。在這全面質疑聲中,質疑者的主要觀點表現(xiàn)在,認為不能將文學的本質規(guī)定為“意識形態(tài)”、不能用“審美”涵蓋文學所有的本質、“審美意識形態(tài)”是“審美”和“意識形態(tài)”的簡單相加等方面。錢中文、童慶炳、王元驤等審美本質論者積極應對這些質疑,他們重申了“審美意識形態(tài)”的邏輯起點是審美意識、“審美”具有巨大的溶解力、“審美意識形態(tài)”是一個完整的理論等觀點,使其理論觀點在應對質疑中繼續(xù)深化。 第五章,對新時期文學審美本質論進行總體分析評價,對其發(fā)展前景進行展望。文學審美本質論,站在馬克思主義立場上將文學的審美屬性與意識形態(tài)屬性結合在一起,強調“審美”與“意識形態(tài)”的融合,在學理上是具有一定的開創(chuàng)性與獨創(chuàng)性的。但其理論本身對審美的過度強調及理論內部結構的松散性,也是不能忽視的缺點。在當前大眾文化泛濫、文化研究不斷擴張的文化語境中,文學審美本質論應該吸取新的理論主張,秉持一種宏觀、開放、多維的態(tài)度與方法,才能有更好的發(fā)展前景。
[Abstract]:The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is a new concept of literary essence that appeared in China in the 1980 's, which was born in the period of reflection of the mainstream ideology of the new period and the essence of the aesthetic. It is an important new achievement in the development of literature and art in the new period from a point of view that is different from the previous angle, that is, the aesthetic point of view, and tries to combine the aesthetic attribute of the literature with the ideological attribute. The first chapter, the social history of the essence of the literary aesthetic essence in the new period In the beginning of the new period, the end of the violent intervention of the literature has created a relatively loose social environment for the development of the literature, so that the literary circle of literature has established the "Literature is a human study" At the same time, under the influence of the western literature and art aesthetics, the Soviet "aesthetic school" theory and the traditional aesthetic experience tradition of our country, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature should be transported On the Process and Proposing of the Essence of the Aesthetic Essence of the Literature in the New Period The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is not a one-time point. The first is that the basic characteristic of the literature is the aesthetic, and then the Chinese Mr. Chinese, on the basis of this, formally put forward the essence of the literature in 1984 as" the aesthetic ideology "and its connotation. The article analyses the significance of the study of the literary theory in the new period, which is the crystallization of the collective theoretical innovation of a generation of scholars, which is more than the slogan of the "Literature and Art as a Political Service" and reflects the literature and art itself. The third chapter, the enhancement of the theoretical thickness of the aesthetic essence and the theory of the essence of the aesthetics, enter the literary theory teaching material, and the two aspects show the aesthetic of the new era. At the end of the 1980s, the aesthetic essence of literature continued to make a further elaboration on the aesthetic characteristics of the literature, and also made an in-depth interpretation of the other important theoretical "the aesthetic reflection" in the 1980s, and enriched the aesthetics. The essence of the theory of the essence of literature. The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature has entered a literary theory teaching material from the 80 's to the multi-literary theory teaching material in the 1990s, its own authority and the authority of the theory itself. The universality is increasing. In the fourth chapter, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is facing and dealing with the comprehensive quality The process of the doubt continues to deepen. From the end of the 1990s, the aesthetic of literature In the new century, the theory of quality has been criticized, and it has been criticized by Dong Xuewen and Lu Guishan. In this all-round question, the main point of view of the question is that the essence of literature cannot be defined as" ideology ", and that" aesthetic "is not used to cover all the essence of literature, and the aesthetic ideology is" aesthetic" and "ideology" , the aesthetic essence of the Chinese, the children, the Wang Yuan and the like have responded positively to these questions. They reiterated that the logical starting point of the "aesthetic ideology" is the aesthetic consciousness, the "aesthetic" has a great dissolution force, the "aesthetic ideology" is a complete theory and so on, so as to make the theoretical view The fifth chapter is to make a general study on the essence of the aesthetic essence of the new era. On the basis of the theory of the essence of the literature, the aesthetic attribute of the literature is combined with the ideological attribute in the Marxist position, and the fusion of the "aesthetic" and the "ideology" is emphasized. It is a kind of groundbreaking and original. But the theory of the theory itself has an over-emphasis on the aesthetic and the internal structure of the theory. In the cultural context of the spread of the current popular culture and the expansion of the culture, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature should draw on the new theory and hold a macroscopic, open and multi-dimensional attitude.
【學位授予單位】:湖南師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:I01

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張亞驥;;文學“審美意識形態(tài)”論的發(fā)生、發(fā)展及論爭[J];合肥師范學院學報;2009年01期

2 劉鋒杰;;“文學是審美意識形態(tài)”觀點之質疑[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2008年02期

3 高磊;;文藝本質:是意識形態(tài)的還是意識形式的?[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2008年02期

4 董學文;文學本質界說考論——以“審美”與“意識形態(tài)”關系為中心[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年05期

5 童慶炳,陳雪虎;百年中國文學理論發(fā)展之省思[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);1999年02期

6 譚善明;;文藝與意識形態(tài)的張力——中西馬克思主義文論意識形態(tài)觀念比較[J];長春工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2008年01期

7 董學文;陳春敏;;略論文學與意識形態(tài)之關系——從馬克思的“意識形態(tài)”觀談起[J];湖南文理學院學報(社會科學版);2008年01期

8 張默然;;“審美意識形態(tài)論”合法性的歷史生成[J];重慶廣播電視大學學報;2010年04期

9 黎風;;文學變革中的不變法則——再說馬克思主義審美意識形態(tài)理論[J];當代文壇;2009年06期

10 馮憲光;;文學審美意識形態(tài)論的互文性理論結構[J];當代文壇;2010年05期

,

本文編號:2506323

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yishull/2506323.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網All Rights Reserved | 網站地圖 |

版權申明:資料由用戶122cf***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com