本文選題：文學(xué)史哲學(xué) + 文學(xué)事實(shí)��； 參考：《四川大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：新時(shí)期以來,與文學(xué)理論研究和文學(xué)批評(píng)研究并列的文學(xué)史研究越來越受到學(xué)者們的重視。文學(xué)史哲學(xué),一門關(guān)于文學(xué)史的哲學(xué),它的地位和作用也越來越受到廣大研究者們的關(guān)注。文學(xué)史哲學(xué)的研究取得豐碩成果,但仍有許多不足之處,少有人從文學(xué)史著作入手對(duì)文學(xué)史哲學(xué)的指導(dǎo)意義進(jìn)行研究。 本文認(rèn)為文學(xué)史哲學(xué)作為哲學(xué),它不是文學(xué)史,它不是要簡(jiǎn)單的討論歷史上遺留下來的文獻(xiàn)資料和其他的文學(xué)事實(shí)何以出現(xiàn),文學(xué)史哲學(xué)是要反思以往的文學(xué)史著作在選擇文學(xué)事實(shí),評(píng)價(jià)具體文學(xué)事實(shí)時(shí)的主觀看法和依據(jù),是要研究歷史上的文學(xué)事實(shí)與文學(xué)史著作編撰之間的關(guān)系,是要研究文學(xué)史編撰模式的規(guī)律,從而來看編撰文學(xué)史的模式是否合理。 所有的文學(xué)史治史模式都包括兩個(gè)方面的內(nèi)涵:一是理論的假設(shè)前提,即依賴一種理論上的預(yù)設(shè)來對(duì)文學(xué)史事實(shí)進(jìn)行整體把握。對(duì)文學(xué)史的模式來講這個(gè)先念的前提就是我們所說的文學(xué)史哲學(xué)的理論指導(dǎo)。人們?cè)诰幾膶W(xué)史之初所掌握的知識(shí)結(jié)構(gòu)、對(duì)材料史實(shí)的主觀意識(shí)和反思都會(huì)體現(xiàn)在這文學(xué)史哲學(xué)的理論預(yù)設(shè)之中;二是對(duì)文學(xué)史事件的整合,通過文學(xué)史哲學(xué)理論預(yù)設(shè)的理性智識(shí)力量,使文學(xué)史偶然事件在思維中統(tǒng)一為一個(gè)歷時(shí)性與邏輯性相結(jié)合的過程而成為可理解的,這里原先零散的歷史碎片被整合成一個(gè)一維連續(xù)體并被人的認(rèn)識(shí)能力所理解。這也就是對(duì)文學(xué)史具體史實(shí)的選擇,整理和重構(gòu)。無論承不承認(rèn),有意或無意,文學(xué)史編撰者總是以某種固有的文學(xué)史治史模式為出發(fā)點(diǎn),去運(yùn)作、編撰文學(xué)史。 任何文學(xué)事實(shí)的選擇和文學(xué)史的編撰都需要有文學(xué)史哲學(xué)理論觀點(diǎn)的指導(dǎo)。其實(shí)無論自覺與否,人們?cè)诰幾膶W(xué)史的時(shí)候,都運(yùn)用了一定的理論觀念
[Abstract]:Since the new era, the study of literary history, parallel to the study of literary theory and literary criticism, has been paid more and more attention by scholars. Literature history philosophy, a philosophy about literature history, its status and function are paid more and more attention by researchers. The research on the philosophy of the history of literature has made a lot of achievements, but there are still many shortcomings. Few people study the guiding significance of the philosophy of the history of literature from the literary history works. This paper holds that the philosophy of the history of literature is a philosophy, it is not a history of literature. It is not to simply discuss why the literature and other literary facts left over from history appear. The philosophy of literary history is to reflect on the subjective view and basis of the past works on literary history when they choose the literary facts and evaluate the specific literary facts. It is to study the relationship between the historical literary facts and the compilation of literary history works, and to study the pattern of literary history compilation. Therefore, it is reasonable to see whether the mode of compiling the history of literature is reasonable. All the models of managing the history of literature include two aspects: one is the hypothetical premise of the theory, that is, relying on a presupposition in theory to grasp the facts of the history of literature as a whole. To the mode of literary history, the premise of this forethought is the theoretical guidance of the philosophy of literary history. The knowledge structure that people mastered at the beginning of compiling the history of literature, the subjective consciousness and reflection of the historical facts of the material will be reflected in the theoretical presupposition of the philosophy of the history of literature, the second is the integration of the events in the history of literature, Through the rational intellectual power presupposed by the philosophical theory of literary history, the accidental events in literary history are unified into a process of combining diachronic and logic in their thinking and become comprehensible. Here the original piecemeal pieces of history are integrated into a one-dimensional continuum and understood by cognitive power. This is the choice, arrangement and reconstruction of the specific historical facts of literary history. Whether they admit it or not, intentionally or unintentionally, the writers of literary history always take some inherent pattern of literary history as their starting point to operate. Any choice of literary facts and the compilation of literary history need the guidance of philosophical viewpoint of literary history. In fact, whether consciously or not, people in the compilation of literary history, the use of certain theoretical concepts
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：I0-02

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡希東;1950-1980新文學(xué)史著作文學(xué)史觀念研究[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1982274