本文選題：解構(gòu)批評(píng) + 文本��； 參考：《江西社會(huì)科學(xué)》2010年01期

【摘要】：解構(gòu)批評(píng)將文學(xué)研究引向修辭學(xué)、比喻認(rèn)識(shí)論的領(lǐng)域。其關(guān)于文學(xué)批評(píng)的基本看法在以下幾個(gè)層面呈現(xiàn)出別樣的特色:就批評(píng)的目的而言,認(rèn)為批評(píng)應(yīng)該探尋文本的真相、文本及語言的修辭功能、語言的差異性以及互文性等;就批評(píng)的倫理來說,認(rèn)為批評(píng)是內(nèi)在于文學(xué)的,而某種程度上,文學(xué)也具有批評(píng)的屬性;在批評(píng)的功能這個(gè)問題上,認(rèn)為單義性或霸權(quán)化的批評(píng)是對(duì)文本實(shí)施的閹割或話語暴力,批評(píng)應(yīng)該是對(duì)文本閱讀之多重可能性的敞開,而就文學(xué)批評(píng)的核心要求——價(jià)值評(píng)判——而言,解構(gòu)批評(píng)認(rèn)為價(jià)值評(píng)判具有相對(duì)性,但這并不等于說解構(gòu)批評(píng)否認(rèn)價(jià)值標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:Deconstruction criticism leads literary research to rhetoric and metaphorical epistemology. His basic views on literary criticism show different characteristics at the following levels: as far as the purpose of criticism is concerned, criticism should seek the truth of the text, the rhetorical function of the text and language, the difference of language and intertextuality, etc. As far as the ethics of criticism are concerned, it is believed that criticism is inherent in literature, and to a certain extent, literature also has the nature of criticism; on the question of the function of criticism, The author thinks that monomorphic or hegemonic criticism is the castration or discourse violence of the text, and the criticism should be open to the possibility of reading the text, and as far as the core requirement of literary criticism is concerned, the value judgment. Deconstruction criticism holds that value judgment is relative, but this does not mean that deconstruction criticism denies value standard.
【作者單位】： 江西師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：I06

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 花娟;;相同的創(chuàng)傷 不同的文本——后殖民主義視角下《黑暗的心》與《奧斯卡和露辛達(dá)》的對(duì)比研究[J];咸寧學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

2 謝秋恩;鄧曉宇;;文本與視覺的沖突——談中西方文化的變遷[J];時(shí)代文學(xué)(下半月);2011年07期

3 陳舒R，

本文編號(hào)：1905175