本文選題：摹仿說 + 柏拉圖　； 參考：《學習與探索》2011年05期

【摘要】：一直以來,學界就柏拉圖和亞里士多德摹仿說的內涵及關系問題未達成共識。從文學與真理性的關系這個角度比較,可以看出兩者都從模仿的角度界定文學與真理性的關系,柏拉圖認為文學模仿無法做到揭示理式世界中的真與美,亞里士多德則認為文學模仿應是人與自然目的相一致的體現。兩者在構建文學無法達到真理這個結論的過程中,都在不同程度上忽視了文學的真理性僅在被展現的過程中才真正地存在。柏拉圖與亞里士多德雖然質疑文學在模仿中達到真理的可能性,但并未否定模仿本身以達到文學真理性為前提,文學的確是模仿事件,但同時也是模仿性的再創(chuàng)造事件,文學的真理性能夠在模仿中自我表現。
[Abstract]:There has been no consensus on the connotation and relationship between Plato and Aristotle. From the point of view of the relationship between literature and truth, we can see that both of them define the relationship between literature and truth from the angle of imitation. Plato thought that literary imitation could not reveal the truth and beauty in the rational world. Aristotle thought that literary imitation should be the embodiment of human and natural purpose. In the process of constructing the conclusion that literature can not reach truth, both of them ignore the truth of literature only in the process of being displayed. Although Plato and Aristotle questioned the possibility that literature could reach truth in imitation, they did not deny that imitation itself presupposes to achieve literary truth. Literature is indeed an event of imitation, but also an event of re-creation of imitation. The truth of literature can express itself in imitation.
【作者單位】： 大連理工大學外國語學院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究2009年度一般項目“艾略特哲學語境”(09YA752004)階段性成果
【分類號】：I02

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 李s，

本文編號：1899362