本文選題：生態(tài)批評 + 反人類中心主義��； 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：從二十世紀(jì)九十年代中后期起,國內(nèi)生態(tài)批評研究經(jīng)歷了早期的喧囂、中期的混亂和如今的沉著,走在了一條坎坷的發(fā)展之路上�，F(xiàn)象往往是某些深層本質(zhì)的表征,早期生態(tài)批評發(fā)展的起伏事出有因。 在學(xué)界的高度關(guān)注中出場后,中國生態(tài)批評早期研究全面考察了西方生態(tài)批評的發(fā)展歷程,嘗試探索了生態(tài)批評的本土化建構(gòu),初步發(fā)掘了中國古典生態(tài)智慧及其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。但學(xué)科定位的盲目性、切入角度的混亂性、文本選擇的反當(dāng)下及研究活動(dòng)的淺表性又是其明顯不足,這些技術(shù)性缺陷使生態(tài)批評漸入困境。 作為早期生態(tài)批評的哲理基礎(chǔ),“反人類中心主義”以對生態(tài)問題根源的洞察而具理論先鋒性,但它也同時(shí)導(dǎo)致了生態(tài)批評與日常實(shí)踐的嚴(yán)重分裂。懸擱中心命題并超越中心化思維方式,是重?zé)ㄉ鷳B(tài)批評生命力的必要前提。 盡管縱深發(fā)展的努力遭遇尷尬,暫時(shí)的挫折并未能取消生態(tài)批評的現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù)與學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。作為對生態(tài)危機(jī)現(xiàn)實(shí)的積極回應(yīng),生態(tài)文學(xué)與批評的批判姿態(tài)是對現(xiàn)實(shí)主義的傳承,而投向“自然”主體的視角則形成了對現(xiàn)實(shí)主義的深化。 生態(tài)批評必須建立在一定的理論基礎(chǔ)之上,“生態(tài)理性”與“生態(tài)信仰”是生態(tài)批評必備的理論支柱�！吧鷳B(tài)理性”在創(chuàng)作過程中的融貫、在作品內(nèi)容里的體現(xiàn)是當(dāng)下生態(tài)文學(xué)的重要特征,“生態(tài)信仰”更是古往今來杰出生態(tài)文學(xué)的重大主題,它們作為兩個(gè)理論新范疇的引入,是以提高生態(tài)批評的現(xiàn)實(shí)針對性、增強(qiáng)生態(tài)批評的詮釋力度為旨的。
[Abstract]:Since the middle and late 1990s, the domestic ecological criticism research has experienced the early uproar, the middle period chaos and the present calm, has walked on a bumpy road of development. The phenomenon is often the representation of some deep nature, and there are some reasons for the development of early ecological criticism. After the appearance of the academic circles, the early studies of Chinese ecological criticism have comprehensively examined the development course of western ecological criticism, tried to explore the localization of ecological criticism, and preliminarily explored the Chinese classical ecological wisdom and its practical significance. But the blindness of the orientation of the subject, the confusion of the angle, the anti-present of the text selection and the superficial nature of the research activities are its obvious deficiencies, which make the ecological criticism gradually into the dilemma. As the philosophical basis of early ecological criticism, "anti-anthropocentrism" has a theoretical vanguard in terms of insight into the root causes of ecological problems, but it also leads to a serious split between ecological criticism and daily practice. Suspending the central proposition and transcending the central mode of thinking is the necessary prerequisite for reviving the vitality of ecological criticism. In spite of the embarrassment of the deep development efforts, the temporary setback has failed to cancel the realistic basis and academic value of ecological criticism. As a positive response to the reality of ecological crisis, the critical attitude of ecological literature and criticism is the inheritance of realism, while the perspective of "nature" forms the deepening of realism. Ecological criticism must be based on certain theories. Ecological rationality and ecological belief are the necessary theoretical pillars of ecological criticism. The integration of "ecological reason" in the process of creation, the embodiment of the content of the works is an important feature of the present ecological literature, "ecological belief" is an important theme of outstanding ecological literature from ancient to present, and they are introduced as two new theoretical categories. The aim is to improve the realistic pertinence of ecological criticism and strengthen the annotation of ecological criticism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：I06

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 史秀利;人類的生態(tài)危機(jī)[D];河北大學(xué);2009年

2 劉曉;對加里·斯奈德選詩的文化分析和生態(tài)主義解讀[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

3 趙勝杰;虐待自然的代價(jià)[D];河北大學(xué);2010年

4 陳木坤;中國當(dāng)代生態(tài)批評“困境”探析[D];江西師范大學(xué);2012年

5 馬玲;生態(tài)批評視角下的薇拉·凱瑟的作品對比研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1891822