本文選題：“無(wú)我之境” + “非個(gè)人化”　； 參考：《西北大學(xué)》2003年碩士論文

【摘要】： 王國(guó)維和艾略特分別是中西詩(shī)學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)型期的代表性人物。他們?cè)诟髯缘奈幕I(lǐng)域做出了杰出的貢獻(xiàn)，具有綜合性和開創(chuàng)性的雙重意義。王國(guó)維在融匯中西哲學(xué)和美學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)上提出的“境界說(shuō)”，以“無(wú)我之境”為藝術(shù)追求的最高境界，對(duì)我國(guó)古典詩(shī)學(xué)進(jìn)行了繼往開來(lái)的總結(jié)，在中國(guó)近代文學(xué)批評(píng)史上具有崇高的地位。無(wú)獨(dú)有偶，歐洲著名詩(shī)人兼文學(xué)批評(píng)家T·S·艾略特，也以他類似的“無(wú)我”說(shuō)的“非個(gè)人化”(Impersonal Theory又譯為“非人格化”)詩(shī)學(xué)及創(chuàng)作，扭轉(zhuǎn)了文壇的舊有的創(chuàng)作觀念和風(fēng)氣，預(yù)示著西方現(xiàn)代主義文學(xué)創(chuàng)作的成熟，成為歐洲新批評(píng)理論的創(chuàng)始人。這兩種理論在繼承和發(fā)展文學(xué)傳統(tǒng)、提倡詩(shī)人的非自我表現(xiàn)、追求詩(shī)歌的哲理表達(dá)、講求詩(shī)歌的客觀化表現(xiàn)等方面，體現(xiàn)出中西文論見仁見智的一致性，因此具有深遠(yuǎn)的意義和較強(qiáng)的可比性。本文欲圍繞“無(wú)我之境”和“非個(gè)人化”的具體內(nèi)涵，從兩種理論的提出、生成的文化淵源、各自的影響及優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)的比照，尋找其跨文化的規(guī)律和差異，以期對(duì)我國(guó)文藝?yán)碚撗芯坑兴砸妗?br/>[Abstract]:Kingdom and Eliot are the representative figures in the transition period of Chinese and Western poetics. They have made outstanding contributions in their respective cultural fields, with the dual significance of comprehensiveness and originality. On the basis of combining Chinese and Western philosophy and aesthetics, Wang Guowei put forward the "realm theory", taking "the state of no self" as the highest realm of artistic pursuit, and summarized the classical poetics of our country from the future to the future. It has a high position in the history of modern Chinese literary criticism. Incidentally, T S Eliot, a famous European poet and literary critic, changed the old ideas and ethos of literary creation by translating his similar "impersonal Theory" into "impersonalization". It foreshadowed the maturity of western modernist literary creation and became the founder of European new criticism theory. These two theories, in the aspects of inheriting and developing the literary tradition, advocating the non-self-expression of the poet, pursuing the philosophical expression of the poem and emphasizing the objective performance of the poem, embody the consistency of different opinions between the Chinese and the western literary theories. Therefore, it has profound significance and strong comparability. This paper attempts to find the cross-cultural laws and differences from the point of view of the two theories, their cultural origins, their respective influences and their advantages and disadvantages, around the specific connotations of "no-self" and "impersonal". In order to our country literature and art theory research has the benefit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宣慶坤;從“古雅”、“境界”理論論王國(guó)維與中國(guó)美學(xué)[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

2 葛桂錄;論王國(guó)維的西方文學(xué)家傳記[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

3 江玉嬌;艾略特文學(xué)批評(píng)理論與《荒原》的話語(yǔ)模式[J];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

4 黃開發(fā);王國(guó)維的文學(xué)功用觀及其現(xiàn)代性[J];江淮論壇;2000年05期

5 張劍;T.S.艾略特在西方──艾略特評(píng)論史述評(píng)[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)評(píng)論;1995年02期

6 吳新云;“非我之路”上的苦行者——《荒原》創(chuàng)作心理透視[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)評(píng)論;1997年01期

7 陸建德;艾略特:改變表現(xiàn)方式的天才[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年03期

8 張松建;艾略特“非個(gè)性化”理論溯源[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年03期

9 文必方;論康德哲學(xué)對(duì)王國(guó)維治學(xué)中精神取向的影響[J];新疆大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

10 徐世紅;析艾略特的“非人格觀”[J];鹽城師專學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1850597