本文選題：《天路歷程》 + 《追風(fēng)箏的人》　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：約翰·班揚(yáng)是英國(guó)著名的作家與牧師,因其著作《天路歷程》而成名。他一生中讀得最多的書就是基督教最經(jīng)典的著作《圣經(jīng)》,正因?yàn)樗麑?duì)《圣經(jīng)》的熟知,才寫出了影響無數(shù)人的經(jīng)典著作《天路歷程》。《天路歷程》事實(shí)上是以寓言的形式生動(dòng)形象地解釋《圣經(jīng)》中的教義。該書講述了一個(gè)名叫基督徒的人是如何為擺脫纏累在身上的罪的包袱而奔走天路去尋求救贖的歷程�？ɡ盏隆ず惸崾钱�(dāng)代頗負(fù)盛名的暢銷書作家,出生于有著伊斯蘭教信仰背景的阿富汗。他的小說《追風(fēng)箏的人》就是阿富汗為背景寫成的,與其自身的經(jīng)歷息息相關(guān)。該書一經(jīng)出版,立即風(fēng)靡全球,使作者一夜成名。《追風(fēng)箏的人》講述了主人公阿米爾在童年時(shí)期背叛了最忠實(shí)于自己的朋友,于成年后為了贖罪而踏上“再次成為好人的路”的經(jīng)歷。 雖然兩位作家生活在宗教文化背景差異極為懸殊的環(huán)境中,且屬于不同的時(shí)代,但他們卻對(duì)人類的未來有著共同的憂慮。他們以一顆悲天憫人的心寫出了自己的心聲,想要為人類尋找出路。這些差異與相似之處都體現(xiàn)在他們各自的作品《天路歷程》與《追風(fēng)箏的人》中。 這兩部作品都具有濃厚的宗教氣息,兩種不同的信仰在兩位主人公的身上明顯地反映出來。在《天路歷程》中,基督教因信稱義的救贖思想在主人公基督徒的身上完全體現(xiàn)出來。而在《追風(fēng)箏的人》中,從阿米爾身上可以看到伊斯蘭教中特別注重義行的教義。盡管兩種宗教有著本質(zhì)的區(qū)別,它們卻都反映出共同的人文精神,即它們關(guān)注人們的內(nèi)心世界,尤其是對(duì)那些犯了罪且被良心所譴責(zé)的人。這樣的人生活在痛苦當(dāng)中,無法寬恕自己,只有通過贖罪,他們才能得到內(nèi)心的平安與自由。兩部作品中的主人公基督徒與阿米爾就是這樣在罪中飽受折磨的人,被罪所捆綁,得不到自由釋放。因此,他們踏上了尋找救贖的路,雖然遭遇了不少折磨與患難,但最終找到了救贖之路,從罪的捆綁中擺脫出來,重獲了身心的自由,最終獲得了新的生命。 雖然《天路歷程》與《追風(fēng)箏的人》寫于不同的年代,但它們卻體現(xiàn)出了共同的“危機(jī)”意識(shí),明顯是受到“末世情結(jié)”的影響。在《天路歷程》中,通過基督徒最終找到永恒之國(guó)的結(jié)局,可以明顯看出基督教的希望末世觀,即世界末日并不是真的末日,乃是審判的日子,以及永恒之國(guó)的開端。對(duì)此,伊斯蘭教有著相似的觀點(diǎn),在《追風(fēng)箏的人》中亦有所體現(xiàn)。面對(duì)末世的來臨,人類如何才能找到出路?靈魂如何得到救贖?對(duì)于這個(gè)答案,兩部作品卻有著對(duì)人類未來的不同態(tài)度。在《天路歷程》中,基督徒成功地抵達(dá)上帝之城暗示著如果人類回歸信仰,就會(huì)有光明的未來。而在《追風(fēng)箏的人》中,作品并沒有給出一個(gè)清楚的結(jié)局,只以“我追”作為結(jié)束,這似乎暗示著人類的未來是不確定的,就像那在天空中飛翔的風(fēng)箏一樣。
[Abstract]:John Benjen is a famous English writer and pastor who became famous for his book the Journey of Heaven. The most read book of his life was the Bible, the most classic of Christianity, because of his familiarity with the Bible. In fact, it is in the form of fables to vividly explain the teachings of the Bible. The book tells the story of a Christian man seeking redemption from the burden of sin. Khaled Husseini is a contemporary best-selling writer born in Afghanistan with an Islamic faith background. His novel Kite Hunter, written in Afghanistan, is closely related to his own experience. As soon as the book was published, it became popular all over the world and made the author famous overnight. The Kite Flower tells of Amir, the protagonist, who betrayed his most faithful friend in childhood. The experience of becoming good again in adulthood for atonement. Although the two writers live in a very different environment of religious and cultural backgrounds and belong to different times, they share common worries about the future of human beings. They wrote their hearts with compassion and wanted to find a way out for mankind. These differences and similarities are reflected in their respective works the course of Heaven and the Kite pursuers. The two works have a strong religious flavor, two different beliefs are clearly reflected in the two protagonists. In the course of Heaven, the Christian redemption thought of justification for faith is fully embodied in the protagonist Christians. In Kite pursuers, you can see from Amir that Islam pays special attention to the doctrine of righteousness. Despite the essential differences between the two religions, they both reflect a common humanistic spirit, that is, they are concerned about the inner world of people, especially those who have committed crimes and have been condemned by their conscience. Such people live in pain, can not forgive themselves, only through atonement, they can obtain inner peace and freedom. The protagonists of the two works, Christians and Amir, are thus tortured by sin and are not free to be released. Therefore, they set foot on the road to salvation, although they encountered a lot of torment and tribulation, they finally found the way of redemption, freed themselves from the bondage of sin, regained the freedom of mind and body, and finally gained a new life. Although "the course of Heaven" and "the Kite pursuers" are written in different ages, they embody a common sense of "crisis" and are obviously influenced by the "apocalyptic complex". In the course of Heaven, it is obvious that the Christian outlook of hope is that the end of the world is not the real end, but the day of judgment and the beginning of the eternal nation. Islam has a similar view of this, which is also reflected in Kite Catcher. In the face of the coming of the last world, how can human beings find a way out? How can the soul be saved? For this answer, the two works have a different attitude to the future of mankind. In the Journey of Heaven, the successful arrival of Christians in the City of God implies a bright future if humans return to faith. In Kite pursuers, however, the work does not give a clear ending, ending with "I chase", which seems to suggest that the future of mankind is uncertain, just like the kite flying in the sky.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：I0-03;I106

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 史艷華;《追風(fēng)箏的人》中阿米爾及其父親的角色行為分析[D];鄭州大學(xué);2013年

2 丁守怡;探析《追風(fēng)箏的人》的成長(zhǎng)小說特征[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1789279