本文關(guān)鍵詞：論文學(xué)中歷史和道德的糾葛　出處：《廈門大學(xué)》2001年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 歷史 道德 文學(xué) 糾葛

【摘要】：文學(xué)中歷史和道德的關(guān)系問(wèn)題，是文學(xué)理論的重要論題。以往的探討主要集中于如下兩個(gè)問(wèn)題上：一、文學(xué)中何以會(huì)出現(xiàn)歷史和道德；二、在文學(xué)中歷史和道德會(huì)形成何種關(guān)系。對(duì)于前者，學(xué)者們多是從文學(xué)所對(duì)應(yīng)的外部世界的復(fù)雜性來(lái)加以解釋。對(duì)于后者，以往的看法比較繁雜，沒(méi)有明確地做出辨析。上述的看法對(duì)我們今天重新思考此論題提供了可資借鑒的資源和啟示。然而，由于其視角的單一性和片面性，因而無(wú)法從邏輯上自洽地解答這一重大的理論問(wèn)題。這主要體現(xiàn)在，以往的探討未能就歷史和道德在文學(xué)中的地位問(wèn)題達(dá)成共識(shí)，有人認(rèn)為歷史評(píng)價(jià)優(yōu)先，有人認(rèn)為道德評(píng)價(jià)優(yōu)先；還體現(xiàn)在，在上述第二個(gè)問(wèn)題上，，它們各家都各執(zhí)一端，無(wú)法認(rèn)同其他的觀點(diǎn)。 本文認(rèn)為，文學(xué)中歷史和道德呈現(xiàn)一種“糾葛”關(guān)系。這種“糾葛”，意指：歷史和道德在文學(xué)中是一種平等的關(guān)系，同時(shí)又呈現(xiàn)出一種相互纏繞的態(tài)勢(shì)。要理解這一點(diǎn)，就必須將此問(wèn)題置于歷史、道德、文學(xué)、知識(shí)分子所交織成的復(fù)雜關(guān)系中來(lái)加以考察。這種復(fù)雜的關(guān)系構(gòu)成了一個(gè)動(dòng)態(tài)的平衡系統(tǒng)，在此系統(tǒng)中，歷史和道德在文學(xué)形成了四種關(guān)系：一、歷史評(píng)價(jià)遮蔽道德評(píng)價(jià)；二、道德評(píng)價(jià)遮蔽歷史評(píng)價(jià)；三、歷史評(píng)價(jià)和道德評(píng)價(jià)之間的困惑關(guān)系；四、歷史和道德之間形成錯(cuò)位關(guān)系。 本文共分四部分： 第一部分為引言，主要是述評(píng)前人的觀點(diǎn)，對(duì)它們的貢獻(xiàn)和不足加以辨證的分析，同時(shí)提出本文的論點(diǎn)。 第二部分為“歷史、道德、文學(xué)與知識(shí)分子”，主要解決文學(xué)中何以會(huì)有歷史和道德，又何以會(huì)形成糾葛關(guān)系的原因。這一部分又分為三小部分：(一)文學(xué)中的歷史；(二)文學(xué)中的道德；(三)文學(xué)審美形式中的歷史與道德。 第三部分為“文學(xué)中歷史和道德糾葛的分析”，主要是結(jié)合具體文本，對(duì)歷史和道德在文學(xué)中形成的四種關(guān)系加以詳細(xì)的分析。這部分共分為四部分：(一)歷史評(píng)價(jià)遮蔽道德評(píng)價(jià)；(二)道德評(píng)價(jià)掩抑歷史評(píng)價(jià)；(三)歷史評(píng)價(jià)和道德評(píng)價(jià)之間的困惑；(四)歷史評(píng)價(jià)和道德評(píng)價(jià)之間的錯(cuò)位。 第四部分為結(jié)語(yǔ)，主要是總結(jié)本文的觀點(diǎn)，并將其置于馬克思主義關(guān)于歷史觀點(diǎn)和美學(xué)觀點(diǎn)相統(tǒng)一的文學(xué)批評(píng)的原則中，來(lái)考察本文的探討的理論意義所在。
[Abstract]:The relationship between history and morality in literature is an important topic in literary theory. Previous discussions have focused on the following two issues: first, why history and morality appear in literature; Second, what kind of relationship will history and morality form in literature. For the former, scholars explain the former from the complexity of the external world corresponding to literature. For the latter, the former views are complicated. There is no clear discrimination. The above views provide us with the resources and inspiration to rethink this thesis today. However, due to the singularity and one-sidedness of its perspective. Therefore, it is impossible to answer this important theoretical question logically and consistently. This is mainly reflected in the fact that previous discussions have failed to reach a consensus on the status of history and morality in literature, and some people think that historical evaluation takes precedence. Some people think that moral evaluation takes precedence; On the second issue, each of them has its own side and cannot agree with other views. This paper holds that history and morality in literature present a kind of "entanglement", which means that history and morality are equal relations in literature. At the same time, it presents a situation of intertwining. To understand this, we must place the problem in history, morality and literature. This complex relationship constitutes a dynamic equilibrium system in which history and morality form four relationships in literature: one. Historical evaluation obscures moral evaluation; Second, the moral evaluation obscures the historical evaluation; Third, the confused relationship between historical evaluation and moral evaluation; Fourth, the relationship between history and morality is misplaced. This paper is divided into four parts: The first part is an introduction, mainly reviews the predecessors' views, analyzes their contributions and deficiencies dialectically, and puts forward the arguments of this paper. The second part is "History, morality, Literature and intellectuals", which mainly solves why there is history and morality in literature. This part is divided into three small parts: (1) History in literature; (2) morality in literature; (3) History and morality in literary aesthetic form. The third part is "the analysis of historical and moral disputes in literature", mainly combined with the specific text. The paper makes a detailed analysis of the four relationships between history and morality in literature. This part is divided into four parts: (1) Historical evaluation obscures moral evaluation; (2) moral evaluation suppresses historical evaluation; (3) confusion between historical evaluation and moral evaluation; (4) the dislocation between historical evaluation and moral evaluation. Part 4th is the conclusion, which summarizes the views of this paper and puts it in the Marxist literary criticism principles of the unity of historical and aesthetic views. To examine the theoretical significance of this discussion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2001
【分類號(hào)】：I02

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姚芮玲;從比較視野看《白鹿原》對(duì)文化與人性悖謬情境的發(fā)掘[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1438514