解構(gòu)主義視角下E.E.卡明斯的詩歌
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2024-11-20 08:02
卡明斯是美國現(xiàn)代詩壇頗具爭(zhēng)議性的人物。有評(píng)論家推崇并稱道他獨(dú)特的詩風(fēng)和別具一格的寫詩技巧,認(rèn)為他是一位敢于突破常規(guī)和力求標(biāo)新立異的美國現(xiàn)代詩人;也有許多文學(xué)評(píng)論家譴責(zé)他的詩風(fēng)怪誕荒謬,不按章法,叫人半懂不懂,甚至不知所云。在中國,關(guān)于卡明斯及其詩作的研究自二十世紀(jì)八十年代開始逐漸引起學(xué)者們的興趣和關(guān)注,主要針對(duì)卡明斯詩作中不同尋常的排版、奇形怪狀的拼寫、特殊迥異的語法規(guī)則等展開討論和研究,也可謂仁者見仁,智者見智。本論文主要借助于法國學(xué)者德里達(dá)的解構(gòu)主義理論從延異、撒播、補(bǔ)充、蹤跡等角度入手探討卡明斯詩歌中的獨(dú)特性、創(chuàng)造性和思想性,并且認(rèn)為這些特點(diǎn)是卡明斯詩歌具有非凡魅力和無窮意味的原因,是卡明斯詩歌之所以具有爭(zhēng)議性的內(nèi)在依據(jù)?魉癸L(fēng)格體現(xiàn)在卡明斯詩作中的字里行間,體現(xiàn)在他對(duì)本真的自然界和真正屬于人的世界的思考和再認(rèn)識(shí),這也是他詩歌創(chuàng)作的主旨和核心。從根本上講,卡明斯確實(shí)有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性,因?yàn)樗∈厝酥詾槿说膬r(jià)值觀,強(qiáng)調(diào)人在大千世界的唯一性和特殊性;卡明斯很反叛,因?yàn)樗牙L畫創(chuàng)作中的一些理念借鑒到詩歌寫作中,并接受立體主義、達(dá)達(dá)主義等的影響,隨心所欲地造詞、大小寫、排列組合、句法變異等等,...
【文章頁數(shù)】:86 頁
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 E. E. Cummings's life and poetry
1.2 E. E. Cummings in America and China
1.2.1 E. E. Cummings in America
1.2.2 E. E. Cummings in China
1.3 The research method and its value
1.4 The thematic structure of the paper
Chapter 2 Theory of Deconstruction and Literature
2.1 Jacques Derrida's theory of deconstruction
2.1.1 Dissemination:undecidable
2.1.2 Differance:jeu as its nature
2.1.3 Supplement and trace
2.2 A deconstructive consideration of literature
2.2.1 A focus:the intentionalitv of writers and the meanings of the texts
2.2.2 Temporality and iterability
2.2.3 Signifier and signified: constituted, but not constitutive
2.3 Theory of deconstruction and E. E. Cummings's poems
Chapter 3 A Deconstructive Reading of E. E. Cummings's Poems
3.1 A critical view of E. E. Cummings's poems
3.1.1 Word play: Vague and strange
3.1.2 Uniqueness: Sophisticated and different
3.1.3 A Deconstructive approach
3.2 The characteristics of E. E. Cummings's Poems
3.2.1 Original
3.2.1.1 Deconstruction of words and grammar: Denying Phonecentrism
3.2.1.2 An analysis of "r-p-o-p-h-e-s-s-a-g-r", "the", etc
3.2.1.3 E. E. Cummings-style:an original way of describing the chaotic immediacy of sensuous experience
3.2.2 Anti-traditional
3.2.2.1 Deconstruction of sentences: Function of "difference"
3.2.2.2 An analysis of "Buffalo Bill's", "O sweet spontaneous", etc
3.2.2.3 Changeability and "unreadable": playing with language
3.2.3 Philosophical
3.2.3.1 Deconstruction of texts: Intentionality to blur the difference between philosophy and literature
3.2.3.2 An analysis of "l(a"," Me up at does", etc.
3.2.3.3 Fragmentation of thought: mystical and anarchistic beliefs
Chapter 4 Conclusion
Notes
References
Appendix
Papers Published
本文編號(hào):4012283
【文章頁數(shù)】:86 頁
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 E. E. Cummings's life and poetry
1.2 E. E. Cummings in America and China
1.2.1 E. E. Cummings in America
1.2.2 E. E. Cummings in China
1.3 The research method and its value
1.4 The thematic structure of the paper
Chapter 2 Theory of Deconstruction and Literature
2.1 Jacques Derrida's theory of deconstruction
2.1.1 Dissemination:undecidable
2.1.2 Differance:jeu as its nature
2.1.3 Supplement and trace
2.2 A deconstructive consideration of literature
2.2.1 A focus:the intentionalitv of writers and the meanings of the texts
2.2.2 Temporality and iterability
2.2.3 Signifier and signified: constituted, but not constitutive
2.3 Theory of deconstruction and E. E. Cummings's poems
Chapter 3 A Deconstructive Reading of E. E. Cummings's Poems
3.1 A critical view of E. E. Cummings's poems
3.1.1 Word play: Vague and strange
3.1.2 Uniqueness: Sophisticated and different
3.1.3 A Deconstructive approach
3.2 The characteristics of E. E. Cummings's Poems
3.2.1 Original
3.2.1.1 Deconstruction of words and grammar: Denying Phonecentrism
3.2.1.2 An analysis of "r-p-o-p-h-e-s-s-a-g-r", "the", etc
3.2.1.3 E. E. Cummings-style:an original way of describing the chaotic immediacy of sensuous experience
3.2.2 Anti-traditional
3.2.2.1 Deconstruction of sentences: Function of "difference"
3.2.2.2 An analysis of "Buffalo Bill's", "O sweet spontaneous", etc
3.2.2.3 Changeability and "unreadable": playing with language
3.2.3 Philosophical
3.2.3.1 Deconstruction of texts: Intentionality to blur the difference between philosophy and literature
3.2.3.2 An analysis of "l(a"," Me up at does", etc.
3.2.3.3 Fragmentation of thought: mystical and anarchistic beliefs
Chapter 4 Conclusion
Notes
References
Appendix
Papers Published
本文編號(hào):4012283
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/4012283.html
上一篇:評(píng)電影《日本沉沒》對(duì)原著小說的改編
下一篇:沒有了
下一篇:沒有了
最近更新
教材專著