發(fā)布時間：2024-02-03 05:52

　　阿爾弗雷德.丁尼生是英國維多利亞時期的主要代表詩人。他的詩歌不僅反映了他個人對社會現(xiàn)象的思考和解讀,同時也揭示了那個時代人們對新思想的疑慮、彷徨和憧憬。本論文嘗試著從功能文體學(xué)視角重讀丁尼生的三首詩歌。 功能文體學(xué)是以系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)為基礎(chǔ)的一門應(yīng)用學(xué)科。社會符號層面的三變量(話語范圍,話語基調(diào)和話語方式),語義層的三大純理功能(概念功能,人際功能和語篇功能),詞匯語法層的及物性系統(tǒng)、語氣系統(tǒng)和主述位系統(tǒng)依次為體現(xiàn)關(guān)系。 韓禮德認(rèn)為語言具有三種純理功能:作者/講話者作為觀察者的概念功能,用以表達(dá)人們的社會經(jīng)歷和內(nèi)心的心理經(jīng)驗,同時也表達(dá)事物之間的各種邏輯關(guān)系;作者/講話者作為闖入者的人際功能,旨在表達(dá)他的意見、態(tài)度、評價和他與聽話者相對角色關(guān)系;和作者/講話者作為語篇組織者的語篇功能,它把概念功能和人際功能關(guān)聯(lián)成一個整體,共同在情景語境中起作用。 本論文在總結(jié)韓禮德的功能文體學(xué)的理論和實踐的基礎(chǔ)上,選取了丁尼生的三首詩歌并用其理論進(jìn)行分析。從三大純理功能進(jìn)行分析,旨在發(fā)現(xiàn)這三首詩歌的主題和語言特征,并對其進(jìn)行解釋。此外利用功能文體學(xué)理論所特有的情景語境和文化語境對三首詩歌進(jìn)行了深層次的分...

【文章頁數(shù)】：101 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
內(nèi)容摘要
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Significance and Objective of the Study
    1.2 Approach Used in the Thesis
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Theoretical Background
    2.1 Systemic Functional Linguistics
    2.2 Three Metafunctions
        2.2.1 Transitivity System
        2.2.2 Mood System
            2.2.2.1 Mood
            2.2.2.2 Modality
        2.2.3 Thematic Structure
            2.2.3.1 Unmarked Theme and Marked Theme
            2.2.3.2 Simple, Multiple and Clausal Theme
        2.2.4 Cohesion System
            2.2.4.1 Phonological Cohesion
                2.2.4.1.1 Rhythm Cohesion
                2.2.4.1.2 Rhyme Cohesion
                2.2.4.1.3 Sounds and Sense
    2.3. Context
        2.3.1 Register Theory
            2.3.1.1 Field
            2.3.1.2 Tenor
            2.3.1.3 Mode
    2.4 The Relationship Between Semantic System and Context of Situation
    2.5 Foregrounding Theory
    2.6 Application to the Study of Literary Text
Chapter Three Metafunctions in Analyzing the three Poems
    3.1 Three Metafunctions Analysis of Break, Break,Break
        3.1.1 Transitivity System
        3.1.2 Mood and Modality
            3.1.2.1 Mood
            3.1.2.2 Modality
        3.1.3 Theme and Rheme
        3.1.4 Cohesive Devices Used in the Poem
    3.2 Three Metafunctions Analysis of The Eagle
        3.2.1 Transitivity System
        3.2.2 Mood and Modality
            3.2.2.1 Mood
            3.2.2.2 Modality
        3.2.3 Theme and Rheme
        3.2.4 Cohesive Devices Used in the Poem
    3.3 Three Metafunctions Analysis of Crossing the Bar
        3.3.1 Transitivity System
        3.3.2 Mood and Modality
            3.3.2.1 Mood
            3.3.2.2 Modality
        3.3.3 Theme and Rheme
        3.3.4 Cohesive Devices Used in the Poem
    3.4 Features in the Three Poems in view of FS
        3.4.1 Features of Break, Break, Break
        3.4.2 Features of The Eagle
        3.4.3 Features of Crossing the Bar
Chapter Four Interpretation of the Phenomena in the Analysis
    4.1 An Interpretation and Evaluation of the three Poems
        4.1.1 A Study of ‘Context of Situation’of the three Poems
            4.1.1.1 A Study of the ‘Context of Situation’of Break, Break,Break
            4.1.1.2 A Study of the ‘Context of Situation’of the Eagle
            4.1.1.3 A Study of the ‘Context of Situation’of Crossing the Bar
            4.1.1.4 Comparison of the three poems in terms of ‘Context of Situation
                4.1.1.4.1 Field
                4.1.1.4.2 Tenor
                4.1.1.4.3 Mode
        4.1.2 A Study of ‘Context of Culture’of the three poems
    4.2 An Interpretation of Motivated Prominence in the three Poems
        4.2.1 Foregrounding Analysis of Break, Break, Break
        4.2.2 Foregrounding Analysis of The Eagle
        4.2.3 Foregrounding Analysis of Crossing the Bar
Chapter Five Conclusion
References



本文編號：3893833