《黑暗的心臟》由于具有豐富的意蘊(yùn)和極高的藝術(shù)價值引起了國內(nèi)外眾多評論家的興趣,種種爭議由此而生,尤其是有關(guān)故事與話語的敘事學(xué)劃分。本文作者試圖找到因?qū)适屡c話語的不同解釋而產(chǎn)生沖突的原因,進(jìn)而從解構(gòu)敘事視角對故事與話語的關(guān)系進(jìn)行梳理研究。第一章總結(jié)了國外對《黑暗的心臟》的研究的三個階段,重點(diǎn)回顧了對文本的解構(gòu)與敘事的研究。從中可以看出解構(gòu)主義者的研究停留在宏觀的層面上,敘事研究過于重視文本的統(tǒng)─而忽視了與之不─致的細(xì)節(jié)。國內(nèi)對此文本的研究不僅在數(shù)量上而且在深度上遠(yuǎn)落后于國外的研究。第二章中作者指出了敘事學(xué)研究的新趨勢,要跟上時代必須有新鮮的外來給養(yǎng),解構(gòu)主義者認(rèn)為,傳統(tǒng)敘事學(xué)中故事與話語的劃分中存在著等級的二元對立,并且對細(xì)節(jié)存在著一種偏見。米勒的解構(gòu)敘事線條理論動搖了傳統(tǒng)敘事研究中的二元對立背后的邏各斯中心主義。第三章對《黑暗的心臟》中的解構(gòu)敘事進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)研究。作者對故事的特權(quán)地位提出質(zhì)疑,認(rèn)為話語通常篡奪了這種特權(quán)。故事對話語等級式統(tǒng)治的原因在于敘事學(xué)家對統(tǒng)一與中心文本的追求,而文本中那些"看似不協(xié)調(diào)"的細(xì)節(jié)的存在對此提出了挑戰(zhàn)。這些易被忽視的細(xì)節(jié)形成了文本的多種開頭,造成了結(jié)尾的... 

【文章來源】：安徽師范大學(xué)安徽省

【文章頁數(shù)】：82 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract（English）
Abstract（Chinese）
Introduction
Chapter One Literature Review
    1.1 Conrad and Heart of Darkness
    1.2 Studies Abroad
    1.3 Studies at Home
    1.4 Method of This Study
Chapter Two Deconstructive Narratology
     2.1 Derrida's Deconstruction
        2.1.1 Anti-Logocentrism and Anti-Hierarchical Opposition
        2.1.2 Differance
    2.2 Hierarchical Binary Opposition in Traditional Narratology
        2.2.1 About Story and Discourse
        2.2.2 About Unity and Detail
    2.3 Miller's Deconstructive Narrative Theory
        2.3.1 The Working of Logos
        2.3.2 Narrative Line
        2.3.3 Beginning, Middle and End of Narrative Line
        2.3.4 Duality and Multiplicity of Narrative Line
Chapter Three Deconstructive Narrative in Heart of Darkness
    3.1 Problem about Story and Discourse in Heart of Darkness
        3.1.1 Division of Story and Discourse Concerning Heart of Darkness
        3.1.2 Coincidence or Invasion?
        3.1.3 Beginning Discourse Against Logocentric Law
    3.2 Narrative Line in Heart of Darkness
        3.2.1 Beginning, Middle and End of Narrative Line
            3.2.1.1 Multiple Beginnings
            3.2.1.2 The Dilemma of End
            3.2.1.3 Middle and Transgression
        3.2.2 Duality and Multiplicity of Narrative Line in Heart of Darkness
            3.2.2.1 Double Lines
            3.2.2.2 Multiple Narrative Lines
            3.2.2.3 Deformed and Tangled Line
    3.3 Discourse and Narration
        3.3.1 Discourse-A Double-Edged Weapon
        3.3.2 Lie and Lies
            3.3.2.1 Intentional Lie and Unintentional Lie
            3.3.2.2 Narrational Lie of the Tale Itself
            3.3.2.3 Introspective Lie and Epistemological Lie
Chapter Four Difficulties and Significances Concerning Deconstructive Narrative in Heart of Darkness
    4.1 Difficulties of Deconstructive Narrative in Heart of Darkness
        4.1.1 Agnostic Tendency
        4.1.2 Ignorance of Subjectivity
    4.2 Significance of Deconstructive Narrative in Heart of Darkness
        4.2.1 Construction of Heterogeneity
        4.2.2 Construction of Repetition
        4.2.3 Construction of the Value of Misreading
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix One Articles on Heart of Darkness with Deconstruction and Narrative as Key Words from Academic Research Library
Appendix Two Articles on Heart of Darkness with Narrative as Key Words from 1995 to 2006 in China
Appendix Three Dissertations on Heart of Darkness from 2000 to 2006 in China
附:本人在讀期間發(fā)表科研論文及獲獎情況一覽表


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]被解構(gòu)的朝圣之旅——《黑暗之心》后現(xiàn)代性解讀[J]. 王美萍.  四川外語學(xué)院學(xué)報. 2004(04)
[2]J.希利斯·米勒的解構(gòu)主義小說批評理論[J]. 程錫麟.  當(dāng)代外國文學(xué). 2000(04)
[3]論《黑暗的心臟》的敘事結(jié)構(gòu)及其審美價值[J]. 高偉利,殷企平.  杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報. 1997(02)
[4]敘述人在《黑暗的心臟》中的尷尬[J]. 陳法春.  天津外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報. 1996(01)

碩士論文
[1]后結(jié)構(gòu)主義—解構(gòu)主義語境中的新敘事學(xué)[D]. 劉小莉.陜西師范大學(xué) 2005



本文編號：2928889