【摘要】：19世紀是西方理性宣布神話消亡的世紀，20世紀是神話復興的世紀，眾多的現代主義文學大家喬伊斯、艾略特、福克納等都在文學作品中大量運用神話，神話在后世的延續(xù)呈現在文學作品中就是“置換變形”，神話一次次被重述、重構乃至“戲仿”。神話原型批評作為當今最有影響的文學批評理論之一，為文學研究開辟了新的視野。作為一種批評理論，它自覺地借鑒和運用文化人類學視野的產物，在批評實踐中，力圖發(fā)現文學作品中反復出現的各種意象、敘事結構和人物類型，找出它們背后的基本形式，并把一系列原型廣泛應用于對作品的分析、闡釋和評價，從而開辟了文學研究新的角度和空間。 本論文力圖以神話原型批評理論為工具和切入點，為法國當代作家勒克萊齊奧小說研究提供一個新的角度。本文的緒論部分就作家作品的國內出版譯著、國內外研究現狀、論文的研究方法做一簡單梳理和說明。論文主體部分為三個部分：勒克萊齊奧小說的神話淵源，神話原型批評視角下的勒克萊齊奧以及勒克萊齊奧小說的神話啟示和現代性批判。第一部分以西方文化中的神話回歸為研究背景，著力探討勒克萊齊奧小說中所體現的神話維度和人類學視野，小說中所蘊涵的神話沖擊與交融，進而明確勒克萊齊奧發(fā)現異域的非西方中心主義視角。第二部分運用神話原型理論，，結合文本分析和比較神話學理論，探討《奧尼恰》、《沙漠》、《流浪的星星》、《訴訟筆錄》等作品中的意象原型、情節(jié)原型、人物原型、主題原型。第三部分探尋勒克萊齊奧小說帶給人類的神話啟示—萬物有靈及生命循環(huán)觀。借助自然和女性作家反思技術進步，通過自身無根化的體驗表達作家對身份認同及民族認同的思考。
[Abstract]:The 19th century is the century in which western reason declares the demise of mythology, and the 20th century is the century of mythological renaissance. Many modernist literature Joyce, Eliot, Faulkner and so on make a lot of use of mythology in literary works. The continuation of mythology in later generations is "replacement deformation". Mythology has been restated, reconstructed and even "parody" again and again. Mythological archetypal criticism, as one of the most influential literary criticism theories, has opened up a new field of vision for literary research. As a kind of critical theory, it consciously draws lessons from and applies the product of cultural anthropological vision, tries to find out all kinds of images, narrative structures and character types that appear repeatedly in literary works, finds out the basic forms behind them, and widely applies a series of archetypes to the analysis, interpretation and evaluation of works, thus opening up a new angle and space for literary research. This paper tries to provide a new angle for the study of French contemporary writer Leclezio's novels by using mythological archetypal criticism theory as a tool and starting point. The introduction part of this paper briefly combs and explains the domestic published and translated works, the research status at home and abroad, and the research methods of the paper. The main part of the thesis is divided into three parts: the mythological origin of Leclezio's novels, Leclezio from the perspective of mythological archetypal criticism, and the mythological enlightenment and modern criticism of Leclezio's novels. The first part, based on the mythological return in western culture, focuses on the mythological dimension and anthropological vision embodied in Leclezio's novels, the mythological impact and blending contained in the novels, and then clarifies the non-Western centralism perspective of Leclezio's discovery of foreign regions. The second part uses the mythological archetypal theory, combined with text analysis and comparative mythological theory, to explore the image archetypes, plot archetypes, character archetypes and theme archetypes in Ornicha, Desert, wandering Star, Litigation record and so on. The third part explores the mythological enlightenment of Leclezio's novels to human beings-the concept of spiritual and life cycle of all things. With the help of nature and female writers to reflect on technological progress, through their own rooted experience to express writers' thinking on identity and national identity.
【學位授予單位】：西安外國語大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I565.074

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 高方;許鈞;;試論勒克萊齊奧的創(chuàng)作與創(chuàng)作思想[J];當代外國文學;2009年02期

2 譚成春;;勒克萊齊奧的創(chuàng)作歷程簡述[J];當代外國文學;2009年02期

3 董強;;勒克萊齊奧的世界視野[J];讀書;2009年01期

4 王雨;;Interview avec Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio[J];法語學習;2009年01期

5 冀可平;;永恒的回聲——解讀勒克萊齊奧作品中的《圣經》符號[J];歐美文學論叢;2010年00期

6 胡明華;;行走在布列塔尼暗夜的荒原——勒克萊齊奧訪談錄[J];外國文學動態(tài);2008年06期

7 許鈞;;勒克萊齊奧的文學創(chuàng)作與思想追蹤——訪諾貝爾文學獎得主勒克萊齊奧[J];外國文學研究;2009年02期

8 程抱一,錢林森;借東方佳釀 澆西人塊壘——關于法國作家與中國文化關系的對話[J];中國比較文學;2004年03期

本文編號：2510992