【摘要】：俄裔美國(guó)作家弗拉基米爾·納博科夫在美國(guó)文學(xué)史上享有盛譽(yù)。他的代表作《洛麗塔》雖歷經(jīng)坎坷，但一經(jīng)出版便聲名大噪同時(shí)奠定了納博科夫在文學(xué)界的重要地位。 《洛麗塔》借主人公亨伯特之口講述了一位中年男子與其12歲的繼女之間的畸形愛(ài)戀，引起國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者的廣泛關(guān)注。然而，學(xué)者們對(duì)該作品的評(píng)論主要集中在作品的倫理道德，敘事策略，后現(xiàn)代主義特征以及人物悲慘命運(yùn)等方面，很少有人深入剖析主人公悲劇命運(yùn)后的真實(shí)原因。因此，本文試圖使用拉康主體理論中的三界說(shuō)，即想象界、象征界與真實(shí)界分析主人公亨伯特的悲劇根源。 本文共分六章。 第一章引言部分旨在使讀者對(duì)作者納博科夫及作品《洛麗塔》有所了解，，并介紹了國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)該部作品的研究現(xiàn)狀以提出本文的研究意義。 第二章理論框架主要介紹了著名精神分析學(xué)家雅克·拉康以及他的三界說(shuō)。 第三章運(yùn)用拉康想象界學(xué)說(shuō)探討亨伯特的悲劇，解析亨伯特現(xiàn)實(shí)世界的創(chuàng)傷是其在想象界對(duì)自己和他人的誤讀造成的。 第四章運(yùn)用拉康理論象征界引入法的概念，借“父親之名”使亨伯特不斷感到威脅，進(jìn)而不停的反抗以接近心目中的美好天堂。 第五章以拉康理論真實(shí)界為基礎(chǔ)，深入剖析亨伯特的悲劇根源�，F(xiàn)實(shí)中的亨伯特渴望童年的幸福生活，將希望寄托在洛麗塔身上，然而洛麗塔是他在想象界的誤讀，也就注定他在象征界的種種反抗都是徒勞的。因此，亨伯特在現(xiàn)實(shí)界的創(chuàng)傷是必然的。 第六章結(jié)論部分，總結(jié)全文，指出本文的研究意義以及局限性。
[Abstract]:Russian-born American writer Vladimir Nabokov enjoys a high reputation in the history of American literature. Although his masterpiece Lolita has experienced ups and downs, it became famous and established Nabokov's important position in the literary world. Lolita talks about the deformed love between a middle-aged man and his 12-year-old stepdaughter by the protagonist Humbert, which has attracted the attention of scholars both at home and abroad. However, scholars' comments mainly focus on ethics, narrative strategy, post-modernism characteristics and tragic fate of the characters, and few people deeply analyze the real reasons for the tragic fate of the protagonist. Therefore, this paper tries to use the three definitions of Lacan's subjective theory, that is, imagination, symbolism and reality, to analyze the tragic roots of the protagonist Humbert. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter introduces the author Nabokov and his works Lolita, and introduces the current research situation of this work by domestic and foreign scholars to put forward the significance of this paper. The second chapter mainly introduces the famous psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan and his three definitions. The third chapter explores Humbert's tragedy by using Lacan's theory of imagination, and analyzes that Humbert's trauma in the real world is caused by his misreading of himself and others in the imagination world. In the fourth chapter, the concept of law is introduced by the symbolic circle of Lacan theory, which makes Humbert feel a constant threat in the name of his father, and then resists constantly to get close to the beautiful paradise in his mind. Chapter five, based on the reality of Lacan's theory, deeply analyzes Humbert's tragic roots. In reality, Humbert longs for a happy life in childhood, and his hope rests on Lolita. However, Lolita is his misreading in the imagination and doomed his resistance in the symbolic world to be futile. Therefore, Humbert's trauma in the real world is inevitable. Chapter six concludes the whole paper and points out the significance and limitation of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I712.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 王娟;;Multiple-perspective Analysis on the Writing Style of Lolita[J];海外英語(yǔ);2010年12期

2 蔡莉莉;;《洛麗塔》:迷失在欲望與時(shí)間中的永恒悲劇[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2006年02期

3 張介明;;當(dāng)代西方文學(xué)中的唯美主義——從《洛麗塔》的誤讀談起[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2010年04期

4 耿海英;談《洛麗塔》敘事中的狂歡性[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年05期

本文編號(hào)：2329978