【摘要】：俄狄浦斯故事流傳到今天,己經(jīng)被人們賦予了太多的含義和象征。從古希臘神話忒拜家族中的俄狄浦斯,到古希臘悲劇中的俄狄浦斯王,再到今天的圍繞俄狄浦斯情結(jié)的各種論爭(zhēng),俄狄浦斯形象的流變形式和呈現(xiàn)方式是符號(hào)化的。 從誕生之初到今天的演變發(fā)展,總的說(shuō)來(lái),俄狄浦斯的演進(jìn)方式可以概括為一種符號(hào)化的過(guò)程。這個(gè)過(guò)程又大致可以分為三個(gè)階段,即形成伊始的古希臘神話,發(fā)展到后來(lái)的經(jīng)典文學(xué)形象,再到今天戀母情結(jié)的代名詞,在某一程度上成為專屬名詞。俄狄浦斯的身影逐漸清晰,豐滿并走向成熟。通過(guò)對(duì)俄狄浦斯形象符號(hào)化的考察,我們發(fā)現(xiàn),在每個(gè)階段中,俄狄浦斯形象的生成和它所涵蓋的意義也在發(fā)生變化。 本文共分為五個(gè)部分：第一部分為引言,梳理評(píng)述國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)俄狄浦斯的研究現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)索福克勒斯的文學(xué)作品做了簡(jiǎn)單的介紹,并說(shuō)明了本文研究角度與特色、學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值及意義。第二部分,探討俄狄浦斯的原型,即進(jìn)入戲劇之前,存在于神話體系中的俄狄浦斯及其家族。第三部分,戲劇經(jīng)典《俄狄浦斯王》。通過(guò)分析人物的多重身份及其命運(yùn)悲劇之間的關(guān)系,揭示出俄狄浦斯積極的主體形象。第四部分,對(duì)批評(píng)視野中的俄狄浦斯熱進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要分析。重點(diǎn)探討弗洛伊德的“俄狄浦斯情結(jié)”以及《俄狄浦斯王》文本的反理論性。第五部分,結(jié)語(yǔ),對(duì)本論文做一個(gè)總體的概括。
[Abstract]:Oedipus story has been handed down to this day, has been given too much meaning and symbol. From the Oedipus in the ancient Greek mythology to the Oedipus king in the ancient Greek tragedy, to all kinds of arguments about the Oedipus complex today, the changing form and presentation mode of the image of Oedipus are symbolized. From the beginning of its birth to today's evolution, Oedipus's evolution can be summarized as a process of symbolization. This process can be roughly divided into three stages, that is, the formation of the ancient Greek mythology, the development of the image of the later classic literature, and then to today's love complex pronoun, to a certain extent, become the exclusive noun. The figure of Oedipus gradually became clear, plump and matured. By examining the symbolization of Oedipus image, we find that the generation of Oedipus image and the meaning it covers are also changing in each stage. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, combing and reviewing the research status of Oedipus at home and abroad, making a brief introduction to Sophocles' literary works, and explaining the research angle and characteristics, academic value and significance of this paper. The second part discusses the archetype of Oedipus, that is, Oedipus and his family which existed in the mythological system before entering the drama. The third part is the drama classic King Oedipus. By analyzing the relationship between the multiple identities of the characters and the tragedy of their fate, this paper reveals the positive subject image of Oedipus. The fourth part is a brief analysis of Oedipus fever in the view of criticism. Focus on Freud's Oedipus complex and the anti-theoretical nature of King Oedipus. The fifth part, the conclusion, makes a general summary of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：I545.073

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王建倉(cāng);;《俄狄浦斯王》與《紅樓夢(mèng)》結(jié)構(gòu)詩(shī)學(xué)及生命哲學(xué)比較[J];陜西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 韋巖鷹;勒內(nèi)·吉拉爾美學(xué)思想研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2007年

2 于琳;試論德?tīng)栰成裰I對(duì)希臘城邦政治活動(dòng)的影響[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

3 杜益文;論索�？死账沟谋瘎∷囆g(shù)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

4 李建;論古希臘悲劇中的命運(yùn)觀[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2203867