【摘要】：菲利普·羅斯是美國(guó)當(dāng)代地位最高的作家之一并被認(rèn)為諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)的有力競(jìng)爭(zhēng)者。他斬獲了除了諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)之外的一切重要獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)。羅斯的作品中大多圍繞猶太人，通過(guò)對(duì)他們的描寫來(lái)反應(yīng)當(dāng)今猶太人所處的生存困境和迷茫狀態(tài)。在他的作品中，《人性的污穢》自出版就受到眾多媒體和評(píng)論家的強(qiáng)力推薦并獲獎(jiǎng)無(wú)數(shù)。 本文以《人性的污穢》中的主要人物為研究對(duì)象，試用�？碌臋�(quán)力話語(yǔ)理論對(duì)研究對(duì)象進(jìn)行分析，揭示人物悲劇命運(yùn)的根源及在白人掌控權(quán)力話語(yǔ)的社會(huì)下邊緣人物必然經(jīng)歷的身份危機(jī)。文章結(jié)構(gòu)將分為以下五部分。 緒論部分首先對(duì)菲利普羅斯生平及其作品進(jìn)行概述并對(duì)本文所要分析的作品《人性的污穢》做簡(jiǎn)要介紹；其次總結(jié)國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)菲利普羅斯作品的研究現(xiàn)狀,提出自己的研究切入點(diǎn)。 第一章分別對(duì)福柯提出的權(quán)力話語(yǔ)理論和‘身份’進(jìn)行定義。本文主要采用斯圖爾特霍爾對(duì)身份的定義，即文化身份和性別身份對(duì)權(quán)力話語(yǔ)如何導(dǎo)致人的身份危機(jī)進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要理論闡釋。 第二章對(duì)小說(shuō)中的黑人科爾曼和赫伯特在權(quán)力話語(yǔ)下所經(jīng)歷的身份危機(jī)進(jìn)行福柯式的解讀。本文運(yùn)用福柯的生命權(quán)力理論闡釋導(dǎo)致種族歧視的根本原因，揭示科爾曼在種族意識(shí)下的文化身份危機(jī)；運(yùn)用�？碌娜俺ㄒ暲碚撽U述赫伯特背叛科爾曼的根本原因及必然性進(jìn)一步揭示黑人在白人掌控話語(yǔ)權(quán)的社會(huì)中所遭遇的生存困境。 第三章分析小說(shuō)中兩個(gè)主要女性人物，即來(lái)自社會(huì)底層的福尼亞及來(lái)自其他民族的知識(shí)精英德芬妮。通過(guò)對(duì)兩個(gè)女性分析，揭示無(wú)論女性處于何種社會(huì)地位，都無(wú)法逃離由性別主義產(chǎn)生的性別差異和種族主義引發(fā)文化身份的差異給她們帶來(lái)的悲劇性命運(yùn)和無(wú)法避免的身份危機(jī)。 第四章中探討文中出現(xiàn)的大量性話題。筆者用�？碌臋�(quán)力理論闡釋作為當(dāng)今社會(huì)“忌諱”的話題是如何在權(quán)力話語(yǔ)的操縱下被變本加厲肆無(wú)忌憚的探討，揭示人們是如何在權(quán)力話語(yǔ)的影響下造成的對(duì)“性”言行不一從而陷入身份危機(jī)。 結(jié)論進(jìn)行總結(jié)并強(qiáng)調(diào)論文主題，，即無(wú)論邊緣人如何迎合這個(gè)充滿虛偽的道德標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，種族歧視和性別歧視的社會(huì)要求都無(wú)法逃脫身份危機(jī)和夢(mèng)想的幻滅。
[Abstract]:Philip Ross is one of the highest-ranking contemporary American writers and considered a strong contender for the Nobel Prize for Literature. He won all but the Nobel Prize for Literature. Most of Ross's works revolve around Jews, reflecting the living predicament and confusion of the Jews by describing them. In his work, the uncleanness of Human Nature has been highly recommended and won numerous awards by media and critics since its publication. In this paper, the main characters in "the filth of Human Nature" are taken as the research object, and Foucault's power discourse theory is used to analyze the research object. It reveals the origin of the tragic fate of the characters and the identity crisis that the marginal characters must experience in the society where white people control power discourse. The structure of the article will be divided into the following five parts. The first part of the introduction summarizes Philip Ross's life and his works, and briefly introduces the works "the pollution of Human Nature", and then summarizes the current research situation of Philip Ross's works at home and abroad. Put forward their own research entry point. Chapter one defines Foucault's power discourse theory and identity. This paper mainly uses Stuart Hall's definition of identity, that is, cultural identity and gender identity, to explain briefly how power discourse leads to human identity crisis. The second chapter analyzes the identity crisis experienced by Coleman and Herbert in power discourse. This paper uses Foucault's theory of life power to explain the root cause of racial discrimination and reveals Coleman's crisis of cultural identity under the racial consciousness. Applying Foucault's panoramic open view theory to explain the fundamental reason and inevitability of Herbert's betrayal of Coleman, it further reveals the survival dilemma of black people in a society where white people control the right to speak. The third chapter analyzes the two main female characters in the novel, that is, Virginia from the bottom of the society and the intellectual elite from other nationalities. Through the analysis of two women, it is revealed that no matter what social status women are in, Neither of them can escape the tragic fate and the inevitable identity crisis caused by sexism and the difference of cultural identity caused by racism. The fourth chapter discusses a large number of sexual topics in the text. The author uses Foucault's power theory to explain how the topic of "taboo" in today's society is how to be unscrupulously explored under the manipulation of power discourse. It reveals how people fall into identity crisis because of the influence of power discourse. The conclusion concludes and emphasizes the theme of the thesis that no matter how marginalized people meet the false moral standards racial and sexist social demands cannot escape identity crisis and disillusionment of dreams.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：I712.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鄭軍榮;;菲利普·羅斯與文化身份認(rèn)同[J];電影文學(xué);2009年24期

本文編號(hào)：2192308