本文選題：庫切 + 新自傳��； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)自傳重視資料價(jià)值,以紀(jì)實(shí)性為目的,以真實(shí)來追求真實(shí)而往往忽略了自傳所具有的思想價(jià)值和藝術(shù)價(jià)值,庫切對(duì)此提出了質(zhì)疑,他更深刻的思考什么是自傳,如何更好的呈現(xiàn)真實(shí)的問題,他提出了一切自傳都是故事敘述的自傳觀,把真實(shí)與虛構(gòu)融合來創(chuàng)作一種帶有虛構(gòu)色彩的自傳,并在《男孩》、《青春》、《夏日》、《兇年紀(jì)事》的創(chuàng)作中進(jìn)行了嘗試,滲透著他的獨(dú)特的時(shí)間意識(shí)和對(duì)社會(huì)、歷史的獨(dú)到見解及自我的深刻反思的這四部獨(dú)特自傳《男孩》、《青春》、《夏日》、《兇年紀(jì)事》分別從不同方面對(duì)傳統(tǒng)自傳提出了挑戰(zhàn)。本論文共分三章 第一章,探討《男孩》和《青春》的第三人稱現(xiàn)在時(shí)態(tài)敘事的嘗試,這是庫切對(duì)傳統(tǒng)自傳的第一人稱回顧性視角的反叛,《男孩》和《青春》以一個(gè)處于邊緣地帶的孩子的視角進(jìn)行敘述,并伴隨著聚焦的隱性轉(zhuǎn)換,這樣一種第三人稱的敘述方式更具客觀性,從而避免了第一人稱敘事所造成的主觀專斷的靜止效果。而一般現(xiàn)在時(shí)態(tài)的運(yùn)用,滲透了庫切獨(dú)特的時(shí)間觀,使得敘述時(shí)間與經(jīng)驗(yàn)時(shí)間出現(xiàn)了重合,文章中偶爾的回憶現(xiàn)象也即成為即興的回憶,從而也就消除了傳統(tǒng)自傳的過去時(shí)態(tài)中由于遺忘所帶來的不確定性。 第二章,探討《夏日》中借“他人”生活書寫個(gè)人歷史主題的獨(dú)特創(chuàng)作嘗試,傳統(tǒng)自傳是通過個(gè)人生活來完整的展現(xiàn)自我的,庫切認(rèn)為他人生活與自我生活是糾纏在一起的,在《夏日》中他把自我揉碎放入朱莉亞、瑪戈特、阿德瑞娜、馬丁、蘇菲這些人的故事中,在更廣闊的生活圈子里,更大的歷史背景中,通過碎片來呈現(xiàn)自我映像,探求自我真相,這也是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)自傳書寫自我的一種拓展。 第三章,探討《兇年紀(jì)事》中的對(duì)話性創(chuàng)作嘗試,庫切不贊同傳統(tǒng)自傳以自我言說的獨(dú)白方式探求真實(shí),而是允許不同聲音的存在,他認(rèn)為通過對(duì)話呈現(xiàn)出來的事實(shí)更具真理性,融入庫切對(duì)社會(huì)的深刻認(rèn)識(shí),對(duì)人生的深刻反思的《兇年紀(jì)事》由于所采用的對(duì)話策略而形成的開放狀態(tài)是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)自傳企圖通過獨(dú)白的方式而呈現(xiàn)真相的封閉狀態(tài)的一種創(chuàng)新。
[Abstract]:Traditional autobiographies attach importance to the value of materials, pursue reality for the purpose of reality, but often ignore the ideological value and artistic value of autobiography. Kuchet questions this, and he thinks more deeply about what is autobiography. How to better present the true question, he proposed that all autobiography is the autobiographical view of story narration, the fusion of truth and fiction to create a kind of autobiography with fictional color. And in the creation of "Boy", "Youth", "Summer", "the Bad year Chronicle", which permeates his unique sense of time and society, These four unique autobiographies of historical originality and introspection of themselves, "Boy", "Youth", "Summer" and "the Chronicle of the terrible year" respectively challenge the traditional autobiography from different aspects. This thesis is divided into three chapters: the first chapter, to explore the third person present tense narrative attempt of "Boy" and "Youth". This is Kuchet's rebellion against the first person retrospective perspective of the traditional autobiography, "Boys" and "Youth" narrated in the perspective of a marginal child, accompanied by a recessive shift in focus. Such a third-person narrative is more objective, thus avoiding the subjective static effect caused by the first-person narration. The use of the general present tense permeates Kuche's unique view of time, which makes the narrative time coincide with the experiential time. The occasional recollection phenomenon in the article is also called improvisational memory. Thus, the uncertainty caused by oblivion in the past tense of traditional autobiography is eliminated. In the second chapter, we discuss the unique creation of personal historical theme written by "others" in "Summer". Traditional autobiography is a complete display of self through personal life. Kuche believes that other people's life and self life are intertwined. In Summer, he crumpled himself into the stories of Julia, Margot, Adelina, Martin, Sophie, and in the broader world of life, in the larger historical context, he represented himself through fragments. Seeking self-truth is also an extension of traditional autobiography. In chapter three, we discuss the dialogical creation in the year of the Bad. Kuche does not agree that traditional autobiographies seek truth in the monologue of self-talk, but allow the existence of different voices. He believed that the facts presented through dialogue were more genuine and integrated with Kuchet's profound understanding of society. The opening state formed by the dialogical strategy used in the profound introspection of life is an innovation in the closed state of the traditional autobiography which attempts to present the truth through monologue.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：I478.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐潔;;復(fù)義的自傳——庫切寓言的后殖民背景[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2010年09期

2 王麗麗;一曲殖民主義的哀歌——評(píng)1999年布克獎(jiǎng)獲獎(jiǎng)小說《恥辱》[J];當(dāng)代外國(guó)文學(xué);2000年03期

3 楊正潤(rùn);自傳死亡了嗎?——關(guān)于英美學(xué)術(shù)界的一場(chǎng)爭(zhēng)論[J];當(dāng)代外國(guó)文學(xué);2001年04期

4 段楓;;歷史的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)者——庫切對(duì)傳統(tǒng)現(xiàn)實(shí)主義的繼承與超越[J];當(dāng)代外國(guó)文學(xué);2006年03期

5 秦海花;;拓展小說極限,尋求新的主題——從《慢人》看庫切的后現(xiàn)代主義小說觀[J];當(dāng)代外國(guó)文學(xué);2008年02期

6 高文惠;;庫切——混雜文化身份的承載者[J];東方叢刊;2006年02期

7 文敏;;生命的多元意向[J];讀書;2008年07期

8 高文惠;;J.M.庫切:抵制中心的帝國(guó)流散者[J];德州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

9 石平萍;關(guān)注局外人的諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)得主庫切[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);2004年01期

10 周長(zhǎng)才;風(fēng)月所以驚世界——對(duì)庫切小說的一種解釋[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);2004年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王旭峰;解放政治與后殖民文學(xué)[D];南開大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫會(huì)華;鄉(xiāng)關(guān)何處——解讀庫切作品中的文化身份問題[D];西北大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2043853