本文選題：張愛玲 + D·H勞倫斯�。� 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：自從人類誕生以來，“認識你自己”，便成了人們永恒的追求與目標(biāo)。但是對于這個自己，我們是不是真正的認識它呢？我們真正要認識的不只是那個我們已經(jīng)熟知的那個理性的“自我”，更是那個未知的“自我”。對這兩方面“自我”的完整的認識，才能使我們真正的建構(gòu)完整而真實的“自我”。 張愛玲與勞倫斯，他們作為20世紀(jì)探索兩性關(guān)系中的“自我”的作家，便受到越來越多人的關(guān)注。本文以張愛玲的短篇小說集《傳奇》中有代表性的兩性形象，以及勞倫斯三部長篇小說中有代表性的兩性形象，來比較分析兩位作家筆下兩性關(guān)系中的“自我”形象的異同。兩位作家的文學(xué)觀對于他們創(chuàng)作中對于“自我”的理解有非常大的影響，通過對兩位作家及其作品的分析，為我們展示了在兩性相處中關(guān)于“自我”的獲得以及失去，，以及兩性關(guān)系中人對“自我”的探索、發(fā)現(xiàn)與建構(gòu)，以及“虛假自我”在兩性中對于“真實自我”的尋求，這為我們提供了建構(gòu)真實、完整“自我”的途徑，可以幫助我們更好的認識我們自己，更好的成為自己。 這兩位作家在自己的作品中，共同追求的是一種在真實的本真狀態(tài)中，真實的、有生命活力的“自我”的完善與建構(gòu)。但二者的創(chuàng)作又有所不同。張愛玲作品中的兩性形象，更多的是一種清醒的失去主體“自我”的痛苦之旅，在自我尋找中，更多的是被動的狀態(tài)，而勞倫斯對于兩性中自我的思考與建構(gòu)，是一種主動的自我尋求，他在尋找一種能夠獲得真正自我的途徑。本文是對勞倫斯與張愛玲作品中兩性形象的“自我”探究的深入與整體的分析整理，本文將以文本細讀的方式詳盡比較分析兩位作家作品中兩性關(guān)系中獨特的“自我”。以心理分析與精神分析來分析兩性關(guān)系中男女的“真實的自我”，并且從潛意識與非理性角度來深入剖析影響“真實自我”獲得的種種阻礙因素。健康的“自我”對于建構(gòu)健康、有生命力的兩性關(guān)系也尤為重要。張愛玲與勞倫斯對于男性與女性的自我的探究在當(dāng)時的時代是極為獨特的，并且有著非常積極的探索意義。20世紀(jì)可以說是一個探索“自我”的世紀(jì)，然而對于“自我”的探究是人類永恒的話題。
[Abstract]:Since the birth of mankind, "know yourself" has become the eternal pursuit and goal of people. But do we really recognize it for ourselves? What we really need to know is not just the rational self we already know, but the unknown self. Only through a complete understanding of these two aspects of self can we truly construct a complete and true self. Zhang Ailing and Lawrence, as writers of exploring the self in the 20 th century, have attracted more and more attention. Based on the representative images of both sexes in Zhang Ailing's short story collection Legend, and in Lawrence's three novels, this paper compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between the two writers' images of "self" in the relationship between men and women. The literary view of the two writers has a great influence on their understanding of the "self" in their works. Through the analysis of the two writers and their works, it shows us the acquisition and loss of the "self" in the process of getting along with each other. And the exploration, discovery and construction of the "self" in the relationship between the two sexes, as well as the search for the "true self" in the "false self" in both sexes, which provides us with a way to construct the true and complete "self". It can help us to know ourselves better and become ourselves better. In their own works, the two writers jointly pursue the perfection and construction of a true and dynamic "self" in the true true state. But their creations are different. The images of both sexes in Zhang Ailing's works are more of a sobering and painful journey of losing the subject "self", and in the process of self-seeking, more of them are passive, while Lawrence's thinking and construction of the self-between the two sexes. Is an active self-seeking, he is looking for a way to achieve the true self. This paper is a thorough and overall analysis of the self-exploration of the images of both sexes in Lawrence and Zhang Ailing's works. This paper will compare and analyze in detail the unique "ego" in the relationship between the two writers' works by the way of careful reading of the text. Psychoanalysis and psychoanalysis are used to analyze the "true self" of men and women in the relationship between men and women, and the various obstacles affecting the "true self" are deeply analyzed from the perspective of subconscious and irrational. The healthy self is also very important for the construction of healthy and vital relationship between the two sexes. Zhang Ailing and Lawrence's inquiry into the self of men and women was extremely unique in the times of that time, and had a very positive exploration significance. The 20th century can be said to be a century of exploring the "self". However, the exploration of self is the eternal topic of human beings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：I0-03;I106

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 楊斌,吳格非;中國的勞倫斯研究述評[J];成都教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年10期

2 劉洪濤;;勞倫斯與非理性主義[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期

3 劉廣濤;論張愛玲心理世界中的“恐懼”情結(jié)[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期

4 肖曉瑪,尹顯作;論自我意識研究的歷史與發(fā)展[J];韶關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 韓笑;自我的沖突——《紅玫瑰與白玫瑰》中佟振保形象的心理學(xué)分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

2 陸佳;試論勞倫斯的“兩性和諧”[D];上海師范大學(xué);2007年

3 郝媛媛;尋找靈魂的現(xiàn)代人[D];暨南大學(xué);2004年

4 曲拓;“他者”的欲望—女性主義視野下的《兒子與情人》和《金鎖記》之比較[D];西北大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：1787073