《追風(fēng)箏的人》是美籍阿富汗裔作家卡勒德·胡賽尼的處女作,2003年問世后大獲成功,榮獲各項(xiàng)新人獎(jiǎng)�！囤H罪》是英國當(dāng)代作家伊恩·麥克尤恩最受歡迎的代表作,出版于2001年,并獲同年度的布克獎(jiǎng)提名。兩部小說都講述了主人公墮落后救贖的成長故事。目前對兩部小說從各角度所做的研究十分豐富,如主題研究、敘事研究、社會(huì)學(xué)研究、倫理學(xué)研究、讀者反映批評(píng)、心理分析、存在主義、后殖民主義、新歷史主義等,但極少有學(xué)者從原型批評(píng)的角度對兩部作品進(jìn)行對比。就文學(xué)而言,原型指的是作品中反復(fù)變身再現(xiàn)的原始模版,它可能是人物,也可能是敘事情節(jié),還可能是主題�！妒ソ�(jīng)》具有豐富的原型資源。借助于原型理論和《圣經(jīng)》神話,本論文對比研究了兩部作品在人物、情節(jié)和主題上對《圣經(jīng)》原型的運(yùn)用,以加深讀者對這兩部小說的理解。通過比較《追風(fēng)箏的人》和《贖罪》,本論文探討了兩部小說中出現(xiàn)的源自《圣經(jīng)》的相似人物和情節(jié)原型。這兩部小說中的相似人物是以《圣經(jīng)》人物原型為藍(lán)本的,包括亞當(dāng)或夏娃、該隱或猶大、替罪羊以及撒旦。其中,兩部作品的主人公分別以亞當(dāng)和該隱以及夏娃和猶大為原型,展現(xiàn)了人物從天真到罪惡的形象變化以揭示個(gè)體成長經(jīng)歷和性格的改變... 

【文章來源】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)

【文章頁數(shù)】：71 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Ⅰ.Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Current Study
    1.2 Significance of the Current Study
    1.3 Purpose of the Current Study
Ⅱ.Literature Review
    2.1 Archetype and Archetypal Criticism
    2.2 Relevant Studies of the Two Novels Abroad and at Home
        2.2.1 Critiques on the Two Novels Abroad
        2.2.2 Critiques on the Two Novels at Home
Ⅲ.Similar Biblical Archetypes in Character and Plot of the Two Novels
    3.1 Characters
        3.1.1 Protagonists in Their Apocalyptic Form and Demonic Form
            3.1.1.1 Amir in The Kite Runner:Adam and Cain
            3.1.1.2 Briony in Atonement:Eve and Judas
        3.1.2 Characters as Scapegoat of the Two Novels
        3.1.3 Characters as Satan of the Two Novels
    3.2 Plots
        3.2.1 The Fall of Man
            3.2.1.1 Amir’s Betrayal in The Kite Runner
            3.2.1.2 Briony’Lie in Atonement
        3.2.2 The Suffering of Job
            3.2.2.1 Amir’s External Dislocation and Internal Pains in The KiteRunner
            3.2.2.2 Briony’s Self-Punishment and Guilty Conscience in Atonement
        3.2.3 The Return of the Prodigal Son
            3.2.3.1 Amir’s Return to Humanity and Islamic Culture in The KiteRunner
            3.2.3.2 Briony’s Compensation and Repentance in Atonement
Ⅳ.Different Thematic Biblical Archetypes in the Two Novels
    4.1 The Theme of Binary Opposition
        4.1.1 Amir vs.Hassan in The Kite Runner
            4.1.1.1 Egyptians vs.Israelites
            4.1.1.2 Isaac vs.Ishmael
        4.1.2 Briony vs.Robbie in Atonement
    4.2 The Theme of Atonement
        4.2.1 Amir in The Kite Runner:Jesus of Atonement
        4.2.2 Briony in Atonement:Messiah of Prophesy
Ⅴ.Conclusion
Work Cited
Acknowledgements
攻讀學(xué)位期間發(fā)表的學(xué)術(shù)論文



本文編號(hào)：3356901