作為現(xiàn)代敘事的“藝術(shù)存在論”
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-22 00:16
【摘要】：對(duì)于思辨形而上學(xué)來(lái)說(shuō),問題是"存在者在"而絕不是"無(wú)反倒不在",所以它遺忘了"存在"。此在的形而上學(xué)則以"存在的人"取代"理性的人",嘗試在此在的生活世界中給予存在一個(gè)適切的說(shuō)明,其結(jié)果反而是"此在在"而"存在反倒不在",基礎(chǔ)存在論思錯(cuò)了"存在"。鑒于"存在事情"的急迫,海德格爾認(rèn)為存在論只有走上藝術(shù)之途才能解答"存在何以可能"的問題。在思辨終止的地方,以往的哲學(xué)對(duì)現(xiàn)代世界失去了解釋效力,而藝術(shù)作為存在的敘事則"說(shuō)"出了真理,現(xiàn)代的本質(zhì)即是"寫詩(shī)",由此人們贏得了自己"存在"的命運(yùn)。正是在這個(gè)意義上,"藝術(shù)何以可能"的問題成為一個(gè)存在論問題。可以說(shuō),藝術(shù)問題與存在論的融合是海德格爾為人類命運(yùn)選擇的一種可能性。而正是在這里,歷史唯物主義表達(dá)了反對(duì)意見,"存在"絕不是一個(gè)"藝術(shù)問題",而毋寧說(shuō)是一個(gè)"解放何以可能"的問題。
[Abstract]:For speculative metaphysics, the problem is that the being is in, not the other, so it forgets being. The metaphysics of this place replaces the "rational person" with "the person who exists", and tries to give an appropriate explanation of the existence in the world of life, but the result is that "this is in" and "being is not." The basic theory of existence is wrong about being. In view of the urgency of existence, Heidegger believes that existentialism can only answer the question of "how is there possible" only by embarking on the path of art. At the end of speculation, the previous philosophy lost its explanatory effect on the modern world, while art, as the narrative of existence, "said" the truth, and the essence of modern is "writing poetry", thus people won their own fate of "being". It is in this sense that the question of how art is possible has become an existential question. It can be said that the integration of artistic problems and existentialism is a possibility for Heidegger to choose for the fate of mankind. It is here that historical materialism expresses opposition. "existence" is by no means an "artistic problem", rather than a question of "how liberation is possible".
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)理論研究中心暨哲學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“超越審美現(xiàn)代性——馬克思的政治美學(xué)研究”(編號(hào):13AZD028);國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“馬克思主義政治哲學(xué)重大基礎(chǔ)理論問題研究”(編號(hào):15ZDB002)
【分類號(hào)】：J0-02
本文編號(hào)：2482522
[Abstract]:For speculative metaphysics, the problem is that the being is in, not the other, so it forgets being. The metaphysics of this place replaces the "rational person" with "the person who exists", and tries to give an appropriate explanation of the existence in the world of life, but the result is that "this is in" and "being is not." The basic theory of existence is wrong about being. In view of the urgency of existence, Heidegger believes that existentialism can only answer the question of "how is there possible" only by embarking on the path of art. At the end of speculation, the previous philosophy lost its explanatory effect on the modern world, while art, as the narrative of existence, "said" the truth, and the essence of modern is "writing poetry", thus people won their own fate of "being". It is in this sense that the question of how art is possible has become an existential question. It can be said that the integration of artistic problems and existentialism is a possibility for Heidegger to choose for the fate of mankind. It is here that historical materialism expresses opposition. "existence" is by no means an "artistic problem", rather than a question of "how liberation is possible".
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)理論研究中心暨哲學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“超越審美現(xiàn)代性——馬克思的政治美學(xué)研究”(編號(hào):13AZD028);國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“馬克思主義政治哲學(xué)重大基礎(chǔ)理論問題研究”(編號(hào):15ZDB002)
【分類號(hào)】：J0-02
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 黃華僑;;英伽登的藝術(shù)存在論[J];同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期
2 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 黃華僑;藝術(shù)存在論的爭(zhēng)議及其方法[D];中國(guó)美術(shù)學(xué)院;2009年
，本文編號(hào)：2482522
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2482522.html
最近更新
教材專著
